Just for the record because the rewriting of history and facts that goes on around draft time and the yearly off-season yelling threads ticks me off. Here are the Tomlin/Colbert duo's draft picks at LB:
http://pfref.com/tiny/eyhZk - 19 LBs or DE to OLB converts taken since 2007.
Here are the "bad" picks:
Feeney (injury)
Zumwalt (injury)
Jarvis Jones
Spence (injury)
Chris Carter
Thad Gibson
Stevenson Sylvester
Bruce Davis
Mike Humpal
9 out of 19 (47%) that were below the line in the NFL and only one of those was in the first round.
The other 2 most controversial LB picks, Dupree and Worilds can be argued to be a "success" despite most Steelers fans animosity towards them for not being more dominant players. Dupree, even at his current level, will find work in the NFL for the next 3-5 years as a starter or top 14 guy in a defense. Not great for the first round, but not a total failure either. WOrilds would've ended up as one of the highest paid pass rushers in the game if he hadn't retired. Now, we all know that his stats over-rated him, but again, he was hardly a total bust as a 2nd round pick.
So
one first round swing and miss (Jones), one first round single rather than a homer (Dupree) and 5 whiffs in later rounds combined with 3 foul outs (the injured folks).
Who is doing it better? You all can google as well as I can. Find me this mythical team that is just nailing over 50% of ALL its LB picks and I'll back off.