Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

  1. 09-15-2017 03:34 PM #1
    polamalubeast
    polamalubeast is offline
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-15-2017 03:41 PM #2
    86WARD
    86WARD is offline
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Lol.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-15-2017 06:05 PM #3
    SteelerFanInStl
    SteelerFanInStl is offline
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    “I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play!” - Jack Lambert
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-15-2017 06:59 PM #4
    BurghBoy412
    Guest

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    As soon as a player gets fined I always hear Randy Moss in my head saying "Straight cash homie."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-15-2017 07:49 PM #5
    FrancoLambert
    FrancoLambert is offline
    Senior Member Array title="FrancoLambert has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Witness Protection in South Kakalaki
    Gender
    Posts
    1,446

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    How the hell do they come up with these figures. Out of a hat? Three hundred and NINE?????
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-16-2017 02:29 AM #6
    Count Steeler
    Count Steeler is offline
    1 at a time Array title="Count Steeler has a reputation beyond repute"> Count Steeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Gender
    Posts
    18,009

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by FrancoLambert View Post
    How the hell do they come up with these figures. Out of a hat? Three hundred and NINE?????
    It started out normal, but the fines increase by a certain percentage every year. This is the 5th? year of the CBA? So it may have started out as 15,000 but now it is up to 24,309.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-16-2017 06:14 AM #7
    ALLD
    ALLD is offline
    Ghost Poster Array title="ALLD has a reputation beyond repute"> ALLD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Treasure Coast
    Posts
    11,816

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    I don't think Watt ever touched the QB for which he was flagged 15-yds.
    All Defense!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 09-16-2017 07:30 AM #8
    SteelerFanInStl
    SteelerFanInStl is offline
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    I miss the days when a penalty wasn't an automatic fine.
    “I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play!” - Jack Lambert
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 09-16-2017 09:05 AM #9
    JayC
    JayC is offline
    Senior Member Array title="JayC is a glorious beacon of light"> JayC's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    North Fayette
    Gender
    Posts
    2,472

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    i don't really care about a bunch of millionaires having to pay fines anymore
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 09-16-2017 10:11 AM #10
    BurghBoy412
    Guest

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by SteelerFanInStl View Post
    I miss the days when a penalty wasn't an automatic fine.
    Remember the days when an hard hit wasn't an automatic penalty?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 09-16-2017 10:57 AM #11
    SteelerFanInStl
    SteelerFanInStl is offline
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by BurghBoy412 View Post
    Remember the days when an hard hit wasn't an automatic penalty?
    Oh, most definitely.
    “I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play!” - Jack Lambert
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 09-16-2017 12:15 PM #12
    ALLD
    ALLD is offline
    Ghost Poster Array title="ALLD has a reputation beyond repute"> ALLD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Treasure Coast
    Posts
    11,816

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    There is a difference between hard hitting and dirty plays, but not in the NFL.
    All Defense!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 09-16-2017 01:08 PM #13
    86WARD
    86WARD is offline
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Not like the NFL to leave money on the table like that.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 09-16-2017 01:09 PM #14
    86WARD
    86WARD is offline
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Probably saw that JJ raised 33 Million for the Hurricane relief and let it slide this time.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 09-16-2017 03:00 PM #15
    FrancoLambert
    FrancoLambert is offline
    Senior Member Array title="FrancoLambert has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Witness Protection in South Kakalaki
    Gender
    Posts
    1,446

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by ALLD View Post
    There is a difference between hard hitting and dirty plays, but not in the NFL.
    So true. Violent hits are penalized more often whether they are dirty or not.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 09-16-2017 05:26 PM #16
    86WARD
    86WARD is offline
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by FrancoLambert View Post
    So true. Violent hits are penalized more often whether they are dirty or not.
    Which is a problem. The officiating is penalizing the result, not the play and thats a problem.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 09-16-2017 06:10 PM #17
    SteelerFanInStl
    SteelerFanInStl is offline
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    Which is a problem. The officiating is penalizing the result, not the play and thats a problem.
    Yep. They've been doing that for years.
    “I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play!” - Jack Lambert
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules