I've read elsewhere that it wasn't a hold, just a "flop" by Allen.It was a HOLD, clear as day.

I've read elsewhere that it wasn't a hold, just a "flop" by Allen.It was a HOLD, clear as day.
Array title="Godfather has a brilliant future">

Exactly. Even though it was a clear hold (see pic above), they'll argue some ridiculous bullshit like "it wasn't much of a hold and therefore shouldn't have been called," like there are different "degrees" of holding. Hell, there are still a slew of assclowns who piss and moan about Santo's catch in XLIII swearing he didn't get both feet down when there are mountains of photographic evidence to the contrary available by a simple Google search (but those are Photoshopped). And obviously biased assholes like Shannon Sharpe and Boomer Esiason harping on the officiating after the fact only throws gas on the fire. At the end of the day, the pussies and crybabies who absolutely cannot accept a loss are still going to whine and bellyache about how "we had the refs in our back pockets" regardless.

That's fine if that was what was said. However, that blog asserts there was no hold. There clearly was.
I'm sorry, but I'm sick to death of crybaby assholes who can't man up when the team they want to win doesn't.However, when the replay was shown, there was no foul to be seen, only good acting.