Now, as always, liberals lie and exaggerate about what took place. I really don't see anything wrong with how Trump handled it. Sure, it could have went better, but negotiations are not always happy and agreeable. The problem here is Americans witnessed the negative side of what sometimes happens in a negotiation. Do people really believe negotiations between countries do not become heated? Zelenskyy was hoping Trump would be weak and spineless like the Dems. Liberals are too immature, brainwashed and hateful to understand. They must hate Orange Man at all costs.
Now from what I read/heard, Zelenskyy reportedly yearns for Ukraine to be part of NATO. "I want to find a NATO path or something similar." "If we don’t get security guarantees, we won’t have a ceasefire, nothing will work, nothing," Zelenskyy said.
Article 5 of the NATO treaty stipulates that if a member country is attacked, it will be considered an attack against all NATO members and requires other NATO countries to take action, including the use of armed forces.
The two dangerous issues here are Putin, in my opinion, is not mentally healthy and Russia is a nuclear super power. Trump is right, Zelenskyy doesn't really hold any cards without the US. Unfortunately, Zelenskyy(NATO too) may have to give up something that most countries would not agree to.
Russian draft treaties on security guarantees released in the run-up to the invasion focused on NATO, not Ukraine. The three key demands in these treaties were an end to NATO expansion, a prohibition on the deployment of offensive weapons along Russia’s borders and the withdrawal of NATO infrastructure back to the lines of 1997, when the NATO-Russia Founding Act was signed two years before the first post-Cold War wave of expansion.


Reply With Quote




