I have to say that I am at a loss to answer this question.
I have read/heard supposedly clever football people indicate that what Smith likes in his scheme(s) are outside zone running from condensed/heavy formations paired with play-action or in-breaking passing attacking between the hashes at medium distances.
For me that raises several confusing questions....such as:
1. Steelers RBs and OL seem to suck at outside zone. They have tried it for portions of the last few years and almost always went back to what I keep hearing called "power" or "duo" with things seemingly focused on getting a RB behind a guard mauling someone at the second level in the middle of the field. So is Smith going to change what he likes to run or is he going to be able to change what the Steelers are "good" at doing by being a better teacher than Canada?
2. I have no idea what Atlanta was doing in the passing game. But in Tennessee, Smith seemed to like to attack the middle and do it fairly quickly. Wilson seems to much prefer attacking along the boundary and on longer developing plays either by design or through going off-script and extending the play. It was always my understanding that is why Seattle got him Metcalf to pair with Lockett. Power and speed to attack teams vertically and outside the numbers. We know Pickens can do that....but after that....
3. Is Smith willing/planning on making any modifications to "his stuff" to suit the available personnel? I honestly thought this would be kind of how it shook out....especially after the Wilson signing. But the signing of Patterson, Pruitt, and Van Jefferson really seems like they got the WR, TE, and RB rooms all guys well versed in Smith's current/existing play style. That indicates to me that Smith isn't planning on rolling out some big shift or anything. So how does that look in light of the two previous thoughts?
I dunno. Things I think I might think if I were to think things about the Steelers 2024 offense.