NICHOLAS PELCHAR FROM PURCELLVILLE, VA: I am impressed by the job General Manager Omar Khan has done, but to me it is somewhat dubious that Kenny Pickett "demanded" a trade. Now that Pickett is gone, was it a wise move?
ANSWER: When it comes to this issue, it has been my opinion all along that Kenny Pickett quit on the Steelers. The Steelers were presented with the opportunity to sign a veteran, proven, Super Bowl winning quarterback in Russell Wilson to a one-year contract for only the veteran minimum salary of $1.2 million for 2024, and the decision was made to make the move to strengthen the depth chart at that position. It was only a one-year contract, a short-term arrangement, and Pickett would have had the chance to compete with Wilson, learn from Wilson, see first-hand how a seasoned professional carries himself in the locker room, with the media, with fans, and in the process get a chance to learn how to carry the responsibility of being an NFL team's franchise quarterback.
But Pickett wasn't interested in competing and learning, and he reacted to the move as though it were an insult. In my opinion, that was a petulant reaction from a guy who had yet to establish himself as a pro and could have benefitted from watching and learning from someone who has been voted to 9 Pro Bowls, won the Walter Payton Man of the Year Award, passed for 43,653 yards, 334 touchdowns, 100 interceptions, and has a career rating of 100.0 to go along with 39 game-winning drives. That smacked of an unearned arrogance to me, and I credit the Steelers for responding to Pickett's snit by working out a trade for Justin Fields, who has shown absolutely no reluctance to come here and learn and work on his craft, and being willing to do so even though he has a much more dynamic skill-set than Pickett. Finally, it's curious to me that someone who resisted watching and learning behind Russell Wilson is now in a situation where he is having to do the exact same thing behind Jalen Hurts.
https://www.steelers.com/news/asked-...ed-aug-1-x7836