First Hilton, now Sutton. Two quality guys that played big roles. But hey we signed an old dude from the Vikings ... nothing to see here.
First Hilton, now Sutton. Two quality guys that played big roles. But hey we signed an old dude from the Vikings ... nothing to see here.
I liked Sutton. His value was his extreme versatility. And it was cool to see him progress through his career.
But I wonder if the Eagles game capped his value. I think he played but I may be wrong. Either way that game showed that the Steelers didn’t have anyone that could cover high end wideouts. So maybe not willing to give out top 15-20 money for a “#2” corner - whatever that means.
The truth is we don’t know the conversations between the Steelers and Sutton. There really is an offseason/FA/Draft plan every single year. Sutton leaving most likely has nothing to do with an ‘on-field value perspective’. Most likely there is an amount they would bring him back for, want to bring him back for, but the Lions offered over that amount. Sutton is not ring chasing with us or the Lions. Looks to me that it was a very easy decision based on dollars. But, and I feel this is an important point, dollars offered doesn’t necessarily equal on-field value. Sometimes it is just sticking to the plan. Just business, not personal or emotional.
Big "Roles". They were not superstars for the Steelers. They were just extremely good at the roles the Steelers asked them to do. All the power to them if they want to take greater opportunities elsewhere.
If teams like the Bengals and Lions want to pay role players big time money, all the best to them. Hilton is doing very well for himself, and I wish the same fortune to Sutton.
Don’t let the splashier names in free agency overshadow this signing. There are two key Next Gen Stats categories in which Sutton ranked as the third-best outside corner in the NFL last season: receptions over expected allowed (-9.5) and ballhawk rate (20.8%). Though he was part of a Steelers secondary that had some challenges as a unit, Sutton allowed just 411 total yards in coverage, according to PFF, which ranked fifth-best among corners who logged at least 400 coverage snaps.
Kenny Pickett is who I though he was .. Eagles didn't value him either , now he is a Stain at the Mistake by the Lake 3 teams in 4 years more of a shooting star than a superstar
I honestly think planA is Joey Porter Jr at 17. I also think planB is one of about 6 other CBs at 17 if JPjr is not still available.
I also think we need better Tackles. I don't think they want one as badly as I do. I feel that will be a round 2 or 3 pick. Signing Herbig has me hopeful anyway.
We re-signed Kazee but not Edmunds yet. I hope that is being negotiated. Otherwise a guy like Brian Branch or Jordan Battle could easily move into contention for an early draft pick. I think both would be excellent here.
Maybe we don't see a WR, TE, or RB drafted this year? I think one of those will be just because it's what we do. Plus, gotta give your young QB weapons. I think it will be WR if any.
Kenny Pickett is who I though he was .. Eagles didn't value him either , now he is a Stain at the Mistake by the Lake 3 teams in 4 years more of a shooting star than a superstar
I think the Lions are building a very good team for next year. I would not be shocked if they win their division. The Packers lost Rodgers and I'm not sold on Jordan Love, the Vikings still have Cousins and the Bears are in full rebuild mode.
I think the primary reason they didn't re-sign Sutton was the overall salary of the defense. The most expensive in the league. They needed to get cheaper and balance out so they are going with a cheap veteran and a high draft pick. Not terrible logic.
They are feeling it more now, with Joey Porter not playing and the bad injury to Trice as he looked so promising.
Add to that bringing in an old Patrick Peterson that isn't what he has been in his prime, he was clearly no longer the man coverage dynamo he was with the Vikings, and it was obvious to anyone paying attention that he could no longer hold up playing man.
Now, here they are with no Cam Sutton, very little Porter, and a version of Pat Pete that looks his age so far.
Another damned if you do, damned if you don't. Keep a veteran player and we're hanging on too long. Let one get away in FA and we shouldn't have let him go. Just one more complaint log to throw on the fire I guess.
Sutton was above average in Pittsburgh. He wasn’t great. His best days were as a nickel CB. Even if he were better, the way their defense is set up, he still wouldn’t look as good as he does in Detroit. Their pass defense in Pittsburgh has been just about as bad as the offense. If there’s no pass rush, the opposing team can throw all over this team.
I said I thought it was a mistake at the time they didn't want to pay Sutton and they signed Peterson for the same reason I am saying this now.
He's been getting better every year and he turned 28 years old in February. They basically replaced him with Patrick Peterson, who was 33 years old in July.
I don't really think that it is a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't. They damned themselves by signing a cornerback that is 33 years old instead of giving the money to a younger, better player. They could have given Sutton a 4-year deal and he would have completed that contract and would still be younger than Peterson is right now and would most likely still have cover skills at what would be a reasonable rate in 4 years.
They clearly want several things out of their outside CBs (length, ball skills, and the ability to press). Because of his size, they do not see Sutton as that kind of CB.
Ignore the age...but they replaced Sutton with a guy built in a lab to their specifications in Peterson. He was supposed to fill the gap until their vat grown CBs (Porter and Trice) came online.
It does not appear to have worked out, but the chain of reasoning is clear to see.
I think the other miscalculation was that Kazee and Neal could replace Edmunds. They have failed at that so far. And it makes our CBs look worse because MF can't just hangout at deep FS and make plays on the ball or clean up messes. He's often being moved down into the mix to do safety crap that Edmunds handled.
I know I am a broken record....but that was just a mistake....however I also strongly believe that Edmunds just didn't want to be here anymore and I am not sure $10 million per would have changed his mind.
The Steelers were never going to re-sign Sutton to a 4year deal. I am a bigger Sutton fan than most and I hated him leaving. Sutton wanted the longer contract. Edmunds wanted to leave. But that wasn’t my point. My point is the complaining and the Steelers can’t win with most fans whatever moves they make.
We are thin at WR depth so they bring in Mims. Nothing but scoffs and barbs about the move. Monday morning QBs is one thing. This constant complaining is something else though.
I was surprised that Sutton and Edmunds weren't re-signed. Usually the Steelers try and keep their homegrown talent. Sutton could play inside or outside and the Steelers usually keep those types of players that can do multiple roles.
Edmunds seemed like he didn't want to be a Steeler so not much they could do. I wanted him to stay for selfish reasons. He went to Va Tech, my alma mater..
The Lions gave Sutton a 3yr/$33M contract with a $11M signing bonus and $22.5M guaranteed. The Steelers were not offering that, nor should they have. I liked Sutton from his draft and loved we got him. But he has not been a ‘blue chip’ defender and other guys needed to get paid. Unfortunately, we can’t give every player those type contracts.
Edmunds obviously just wanted out. Whatever his reasons he was finished here.