Originally Posted by
HollywoodSteel
I think you’re too smart to really be missing the point of using extreme examples to illustrate a flaw in the logic of a general principle.
The comparison isn’t that the things in question have the exact same degree of risk, it’s that your FREEDOM to do it does not mean you should be free from CRITICISM if you do it.
Come up with your own comparisons that make more sense to you if you like. I’d be willing to bet anything that you have deemed something else unwise that you also should be allowed. Do you ever criticize an offensive coordinator’s call? Why? Don’t you believe in his freedom to call whatever play he wants? What are you, a communist? You see why that isn’t an appropriate rebuttal to criticism of a decision?
We are criticizing the wisdom of a decision, not the right to make it.
But instead of continuing to argue the logical fallacy of any of this, I’m going to try and Steelman your argument (rather than straw man it).
I believe you see this milk crate thing as more comparable to silly tweets than to riding a motorcycle without a helmet. I see the difference being the physical risk involved in one activity that doesn’t exist in the other. Obviously Juju is on your side of this debate. He clearly saw the rewards of this activity (more views, more likes, and perhaps the sheer joy of the activity itself) to be worth the relatively minor risks involved. He also thought it was worth the potential influence his actions might have on his less coordinated and spotter-less fans, who might in fact be injured from attempting the same thing.
I concede both that this is Juju’s choice to make and that my own priorities don’t align perfectly with his. I gain nothing from his fun or his clicks, but I could lose happiness from his injury. I happen to think the potential downside of him risking injury is even worse for him, and not worth the relatively insignificant bump in income from likes and clicks he might get from such a stunt, but I admit to not being a social media wizard.