Sure, never argued against the total # of drops being too much. But refusal to acknowledge that the seeming limitations of the QB helped to create a situation for a great deal of those drops is stubborn optimism for no real reason.
https://steelersdepot.com/2021/06/st...-observations/
Out of 43 drops, 28 (65%) were under 5 yards down the field. Those #'s and my own flawed and hazy memory of the 2020 season, have me picturing a bunch of times WRs had to either, catch the ball and make a move against 1 defender (or more) in order to gain yards, or were on the move and the ball was poorly placed, or a combination of both. Of course, others were totally stationary WRs who just dropped it.
The biggest offender was DJ. All his drops are here:
https://steelersdepot.com/2021/06/br...ohnson-part-3/
At most, he had 15 drops on 144 targets. That is 10.4%. If you knock out 5 for rough ball placement, then he is about 7%. Are drops still an issue?
Also, look at the drops in the linked chart. That is a ton of drops on early downs within 3 yards of the line of scrimmage. Those stink, but the fact that the offense was reliant on 3 yard passes and making guys miss in order to sustain drives is the root cause here. Why was that? My theory is because the QB was not physically capable of reliably doing much else.
Others claim that is far from the case and the short passing game became the only offensive weapon because the OL was terrible. So I see that as strongly connected. Either the team consistently passed from behind the LOS to 5 yards past the line of scrimmage either because the OL was too bad to protect for any longer or because the QB couldn't hit deeper developing pass routes. So the root cause of that is really important and the two are totally linked. Or is there something I am not seeing?
Optimism is cool. Optimism is great. But when it is not tempered by past precedent it just seems totally unwarranted.