https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...s-all-32-teams
Unfortunately, I think the under is the right call this time. Even though there were no big surprises (except maybe the Nelson situation), this has low-key been a pretty bad offseason in which more things happened that take away from the team's chances than help them.
It was pretty much expected that we were going to lose certain players and there was not much that could be done about it, and that's what happened. It's not anyone's fault, but they're still gone, and there was not much that could be done to bring in high-level replacements, either. The main wins were retaining some existing players. As we saw at the end of last season, depth was fairly thin and age was starting to become an issue at some positions, and both look to have moved in the direction we don't want. Worse, some of the losses were at key positions that are difficult to find.
Offensive line is becoming a problem again - but is it the talent on the field, or our ability to coordinate it into a functional unit? If it's the latter, it could be another trap situation for spending a lot of high draft picks with no results until you get the right coach. Will Bush come back at full speed and make all the difference? Will Edmunds - a guy whose performance seems to rise to the level of the players around him - stand on his own, or will he suffer for the loss of talent? There are a lot of things that could either go our way or not, but the problem is with most of them, if they go our way, we are just standing our ground, but if they don't, then we get worse.
Basically, unless we really kill it in the draft, this has the look of a step-back year. Even if we do draft well, there may be more needs than you can reasonably expect to fill in one go. Maybe they will pull a rabbit out of the hat, but my guess would be the team looks closer to the one from the end of last season than the start. My guess is around 8-8, but it would not surprise me if they lost 9 or even 10.