Originally Posted by
steelreserve
See, here is the thing, though. I am a huge fan of science. You will not find many people who believe in it more than I do. I even know more about it than most liberals with 101 IQs.
The weird thing about science, though, is that you can have a theory that is completely valid and stands up to repeated testing, which is indeed the case with the underlying premise of climate change.
But, if you start with the wrong parameters, you will still get a wildly inaccurate result when attempting to put the theory into practice. That is also the fundamental mistake made with climate science.
Let's take it from the top, so the slow kids can follow. Where do you think all the carbon in our fossil fuels came from? Did it just magically appear from an infinite source, or did it come from somewhere? If not magic, then where?
Keep in mind, I have had this same discussion with actual professors and climate researchers, and followed to its conclusion, they didn't have a good answer either, and instead changed the subject to a lot of yes-buts about auxiliary effects like general pollution, or the pH of the ocean and its effects on marine life.