No. I wouldn’t argue that Fournette doesn’t fit a modern offense either but I don’t think there’s much difference between the two of them. Similar in size. Similar YPC. Similar durability. Fournette has more wear and tear being a day one starter. Fournette costs more. So I kinda don’t get why anyone would want him on their team when they have a similar player for $3.5M less and a draft pick. If you had Fournette and could trade him for Conner, $3.5M and a draft pick, would you do it?