
Originally Posted by
st33lersguy
Is it me or does it seems that the rivalry between the Steelers and both of these teams only seems to make headlines when players from one of these two franchises make off-the-field headlines (trash-talk, slander) or by engaging in post-whistle cheap shots/intentionally try to injure players. The Myles Garrett-Mason Rudolph feud is probably the most heated this one-sided "rivalry" has been since the Browns returned in 1999 and it is based entirely on what Cleveland did after the whistle and later off-the-field. As for Cincinnati, the most-heated moments of this one-sided "rivalry" in the 21st century is probably TJ Houshbadillia wiping the terrible towel and the mid 00s Bengals talking a bunch of smack and Vontaze Burfict intentionally injuring steeler players and Pacman Jones strutting around as faux tough guy. I got on this train of thought after thinking about how Myles Garrett has become the new Vontaze Burfict of the AFC North. I hate the Ratbirds, I think John Harbaugh is a jackass, and I think the Ratbirds do have a checkered history character-wise themselves but at least the Steelers and Ratbirds are a rivalry based upon what happens on the field. At least they have a history of close entertaining games often with big stakes as well and numerous great moments. Also no surprise that while the Ravens have successfully built a culture of winning in a short amount of time the Bungals are a loser franchise with no Super Bowl and barely any franchise success while the vast majority of the Browns winning history/tradition predates the Super Bowl era over 50 years ago