Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Conner is not the guy

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="DesertSteel has a reputation beyond repute"> DesertSteel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Arizona
    Gender
    Posts
    10,589

    Conner is not the guy

    I've reached the conclusion that Conner is not the guy at RB. He's a nice guy to have in the RB room, but he can't carry the load... too fragile. Next year in the draft I'm going RB/WR in the 2nd/3rd round. Doesn't matter which is taken first. As they say, the best ability in the NFL is avail-ability.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array title="Moose has a brilliant future">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dillsboro, Indiana
    Gender
    Posts
    2,413

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    I agree. Conner is a 'china doll'......very breakable. Good WHEN he's on the field.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="Fire Goodell has a reputation beyond repute"> Fire Goodell's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Gender
    Posts
    6,039

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    I'm starting to think he's a good RB as a RB2 in a rotation, probably what his intended role was (being a change of pace to Bell). Unfortunately we didn't count on Bell being as stupid as he was.

    Likely why they drafted Snell, but they didn't count on BOTH of them being injured.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="AtlantaDan has a reputation beyond repute"> AtlantaDan's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2016
    Gender
    Posts
    5,297

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Safe to say he will not be getting a long term deal going into the last year of his rookie deal in the 2020 season

    This from Bill Barnwell at ESPN in an article on RBs looking for the big contract

    Conner is a talented back, and the Steelers would surely prefer to get ahead of the curve instead of letting an extension linger and creating another Bell situation, but I don't see how the Steelers can realistically offer Conner a market-value deal this offseason given his injuries. Pittsburgh also has just $5.7 million in cap room in 2020, a figure that rises all the way to $95.6 million the following year. For those reasons, the Steelers should (and likely will) let Conner play through the final year of his deal in 2020.


    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...look-disasters

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array title="Edman has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,993

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Wonderful story and a great person, but is unfortunately way too fragile to be a dependable workhorse.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array title="JimHarbaugh'ssoakedtissue has a reputation beyond repute"> JimHarbaugh'ssoakedtissue's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Gender
    Posts
    5,660

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Quote Originally Posted by DesertSteel View Post
    I've reached the conclusion that Conner is not the guy at RB. He's a nice guy to have in the RB room, but he can't carry the load... too fragile. Next year in the draft I'm going RB/WR in the 2nd/3rd round. Doesn't matter which is taken first. As they say, the best ability in the NFL is avail-ability.
    Agree we need to go rb and wr early. Would love to have Conner around on the cheap but he is not the answer,

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    I actually think a backfield of Conner and Samuels works just fine.

    But, it does NOT work when we have a crippled passing game that lets the opponent load up within 5 yards of the line.

    But also - having a better running back will not change that. We could have the best RB in the league, and he would still get stuffed all day, as long as the defense can get away with murder because we have no passing game.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array title="Steelerchad is a jewel in the rough">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    201

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    I don't really want "The Guy" at RB anyway. I think in today's NFL, you are better off with 3 avg. RB's for $1M-$3M each than 1 feature $10M+ RB. Guy 1 goes down, plug in guy 2 and 3 to share the load with minimal drop off. I'd draft a RB around the 3rd - 4th round every year. As soon as someone wants paid more than $5M, see ya and move on to the next. Ask the Rams, Cowboys, Jets if the heavy RB investment the last 2 years was worth it. Loved Bell, but not at $15M.

  9. #9
    raising him properly Array title="vasteeler has a reputation beyond repute"> vasteeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    richmond va
    Gender
    Posts
    1,934

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    If the o line dosent wake up nobody's going to be the guy

    "Zeds dead baby, Zeds dead." - Butch

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array title="DesertSteel has a reputation beyond repute"> DesertSteel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Arizona
    Gender
    Posts
    10,589

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Quote Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
    I actually think a backfield of Conner and Samuels works just fine.
    How often are they both healthy and playing in the same game?

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array title="j-d-s is a jewel in the rough">

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Erlangen, Germany
    Gender
    Posts
    537

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Any RB is just as good as the OLine. I remember when we had Bell and he was suspendend/injured his replacements (like Blount and DeAngelo) would fill right in and rush for over 100 yards.

    We really need Munchak back. Why did he go to Denver in the first place?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array title="smokin3000gt has a reputation beyond repute"> smokin3000gt's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    3,364

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Hasn't Connor's injury been the same shoulder that keeps getting reinjured?
    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    Tomlin is that good.



    PATRIOTS**

    BUNGLES
    Steelers - 18 Bengals - 16 #0in25 #anotherseasonBungled




    HTG ¤-

  13. #13
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    50,572

    Re: Conner is not the guy

    Quote Originally Posted by j-d-s View Post
    Any RB is just as good as the OLine. I remember when we had Bell and he was suspendend/injured his replacements (like Blount and DeAngelo) would fill right in and rush for over 100 yards.

    We really need Munchak back. Why did he go to Denver in the first place?
    He went to be closer to his family.

    Systems make players. Very few players can go from one system to another And be successful (see KC last season). Also very few RBs can run behind a shitty O-Line and looks successful doing so (Barry Sanders).

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •