I think this defense feeds off the success of the offense. When the offense can’t get anything going it’s mental exhaustion just as much if not more than physical exhaustion that wears out the D. This is a young defense after all. I think the same type of thing will happen against the ravens, that happened yesterday; if our offense can score points, watch the D start to really shut down the ravens offense. They said themselves they are starting to jell. If the offense stalls is where we will start to see missed assignments, PI’s and dumb penalties pile up.
All that is certainly true, but you have to hand it to the defense for holding tough in the beginning when the offense put them in bad spots. Holding the Bengals to that first field goal after the fumble was really big. And when the offense stalled again, the defense held strong.
The defense really set the tone for the offense in this game and made it so we never had to debate why the offense never adjusted... the offense never HAD to adjust. The defense allowed them to stick with their game plan
Maybe with a lead and or competent offense, the defense can relax a bit and not worry about one bad play being the margin of defeat? Actually let’s them play better.
They still faced a ton of plays. But most with a 2 score lead. Seemed to change things.
Or maybe the Cincy o line is just really bad?
Isn’t it a little weird to think that out of our starting defense last night Tuitt, Hargrave, and Nelson are the only players who weren’t drafted in the first round? And those guys are pretty good.
If Burns ever subs for Nelson we could have 9 first round players on the field at the same time. That would have to be some kind of record, don’t you think?
Momentum-wise: Bud Dupree’s strip-sack was perfectly timed.
Interesting...the Steelers defense faced 69 snaps, which is similar to the Seattle game total of 72, but they didn't suck in the 2nd half like they did vs Seattle. Could it be snap count or something else that lead to difference in play?
I think the Steelers found their core DB group. Was intrigued to see why they had Sutton in rather than Hilton, but the numbers show it was the minority of the time.
The defense faced a lot of plays, but it was much more effectibe during those plays. I don't think that has anything to do with our offense, it has to do with the defense winning battles against the Cincinnati offense.
Partly because of the Bungles being REALLY BAD (OL looked lost, receivers were shaky) but also hopefully because we are making progress. Now that they've shown they CAN win a game, this week ought to be a much bigger test for both the offense and defense.
See you Space Cowboy ...
I mean playing from ahead with a multi-score lead and being able to spend the majority of the 2nd half win pass rush only mode might have a bit to do with it.
While I am shocked at the number of plays that Cincy ran versus how many were effective; I honestly do not believe the performance of the offense and the defense can be completely decoupled. One influences and/or plays a role in the other.
It is kind of hard to say, because it is becoming clear that the Bengals are pretty bad.
Its like Tomlin said in the presser....when the offense turns the ball over, the Defense needs to get a stop and get off the field. Similarly, when the Defense gets a turnover, the Offense needs to support them and get points.
The reality of the situation is, that when the Offense is on the field, they aren't thinking and cant be thinking of what the defense is doing. Same for when the Defense is on the field. Fact is that if the Defense didn't fold like a cheap lawn chair in the 2nd half of the Seattle game, the Steelers are 2-2 and tied for the division lead.
Don’t look now but Dupree is 5th in the NFL in TFLs with 9.
And the original "Kong of Dong" himself, Jason GilDong, though the weekly ripping of Lamarr Woodley (The WoodenDong) was freakin' hillarious
The Bungles were playing from a large deficit for most of the game. My conclusions: 1) Stopping the pass is a lot less tiring than stopping the run. 2) The Steelers defense against the pass is better than their defense against the run. 3) It's easier to stop a one dimensional offense.
"You've heard people brag about 'being in the zone'. They don't know what the Hell being in the zone is about. I played in the NFL for 15 years and I was only in the zone that one time." - "Mean" Joe Greene on the 1974 playoff victory over Oakland
As I watched that game, i was suddenly struck with the idea that we have two safeties that could stay with us a decade or more and both are able to put together very good games. We have two linebackers who are very fresh and could also play with us a decade or more and become very good players if not great players. Hargrave and Tuitt are only 26. Mike Hilton seemed to come alive last night, and he's only 25. Steven nelson is playing decently well, too, allowing just over half the ball thrown his way to be completed. He's only 26.
As long as Edmunds is actually capable of playing the position, that is the key to the whole thing.
Who knows, maybe he actually isn't that bad, and adding Fitzpatrick really helped him. Like ... Will Allen caught a ton of shit his last season here, but I actually think he was still an ok player, but Antwon Blake was SO bad that Allen got caught up in all the misplays, either trying to compensate for them, or being in "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situations.
Maybe having Davis and other meatheads back there was having a similar effect on Edmunds. At least, I hope that was it.
See you Space Cowboy ...
I'm never gonna forgive Davis for that hit on Haden vs SD last year. If he doesn't do that, Haden gets the INT and we win the game.
For some kid who was supposedly book smart in school he's stupid as hell when it comes to making decisions in game
Edmunds was a rookie and I thought he actually played well for being thrown into that position and starting 15 games, making over 70 tackles and an INT in his rookie season. I haven't seen any kind of reason in the first 4 games this year that would need to have him pulled and I think it helps to have another guy with high football IQ back there in Fitzpatrick to play next to.
D line is gonna be where the group needs to be upgraded after Hargrave likely leaves in the offseason and AluAlu, Heyward are not getting any younger.
Edmunds has just seemed, for most of his brief career, like another one of those guys who you only see chasing receivers from behind on another long pass, reacting to plays instead of making plays. That may not be his fault, if it was what I alluded to with a cascade effect from other players being out of position and screwing up. At least I hope so.
See you Space Cowboy ...