Not certain how that matches up with this ESPN story that the parties were in discussions for months and that the reason AB purportedly could not tell the Raiders or Patriots about the plaintiff’s allegations was to preserve the confidentiality of those discussions until a lawsuit was filed.
Representatives for New England Patriotsreceiver Antonio Brown and Britney Taylor were in discussions over the past few months, but agreed their communication would remain confidential until the filing of Taylor's civil sexual assault lawsuit, sources told ESPN on Thursday....
Though the exact nature of the talks has not been confirmed, it is common practice for settlement talks to occur before a civil filing.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...d-civil-matter
If plaintiff simply wanted to announce her claims and get a trial those discussions could have consisted of “we are filing suit who can accept service of process for AB?” Plaintiff’s attorney may have said I am not going to bargain until I know whether you indicate the minimum you will pay but any settlement discussions presumably would have required more than an apology.
AB’s attorney said he would vigorously contest the furniture toss civil action and filed a motion to dismiss that case. Then it settled.
Just guessing here but very few civil cases make it to trial once a motion to dismiss is filed and is not granted