Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,254

    Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    I realize that Switzer is the #4 WR on the roster, but I still just don't get why the team thinks so highly of him. I guess he is okay at returns, certainly don't ever realistically think he is going to break one for a TD. And he sure is one tough SOB. But he doesn't seem to actually be a functioning NFL WR. So a punt/kick returner that is not a threat to score TDs and a sub-par WR? Huh? Maybe some of you all have some insight on why this guy is so valued by the team and fans?

    Here is the thing on cutting Rogers, Switzer is basically a RB in terms of how he is used as a WR.

    https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/stats/r...intended-yards

    If you look at the TAY column (Average Targeted Air Yards - The average passing air yards per target for the receiver, by measuring the yards downfield at the time of all passing attempts that the receiver is the target. This stat indicates how far down the field they are being targeted on average.), he had the lowest in the league. That means he ran the shortest routes in the entire NFL last year. By almost 2 full yards. He was also 11th in separation at the time of the catch at 3.5 yards.

    What does it all mean? It means that Switzer runs short as heck routes and catches the ball wide open. And there are a bunch of other wesbites that argue his YAC is sub-par. With some making the claim that he gets less yards after the catch than an average WR would/should in the same situations.

    For some context other classic small shifty "slot guys" such as Cole Beasely was @ 7.4 yards and 3 yards of separation. Thielen was at 9.6 and 3. Golden Tate was at 6.3 and 3.

    The only year that the nextgenstats site has for Eli Rogers is 2016. He is targeted 11.4 yards down the field, with only 3 yards of separation, and similarly sub-par YAC #'s. So Eli can get open deeper but also is not that great after the catch.

    Maybe Diontae Johnson better just get good at NFL football ASAP? Because I don't think Switzer will be very good in an increased role and Rogers ain't coming back...

  2. #2
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Switzer is what he is. A return specialist that can provide some veteran receiver experience. He will make the key catch to move the chains, but he’s not a Pro-Bowler. Everyone wants him to be Wes Welker or Julian Edelman...just because he’s a white receiver. He’s not those guys. However, he’s solid. You know what your getting. Not the case with Rogers...Rogers has only played 30 games over three seasons so dependability is also an issue there.

    He’s also a huge positive locker room guy and that’s what this team needs right now so to sacrifice Rogers upside to keep a similar WR in Switzer? I think that’s the move you make.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,254

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Here is the thing, he isn't really good at anything. He is exceedingly average on punt returns. I'm not going to even worry about kick returns, because that is basically useless. Switzer was 13/19 ranked guys in punt returns last year with an 8.4 average (#19 was 5.7 yards). So he is 3 strides better than the worst guy that caught enough punts to qualify. 3rd in the league in fair catches. So Switzer best skill is just settling under a punt and putting his arm up in the air.

    https://www.footballdb.com/stats/sta...t=25&sort=prfc

    I'm not even all that sad about waving goodbye to Eli Rogers. It is just that if you are going to keep a small WR on the roster because he is good at returns, than I would have kept Spencer 8 times out of 10. I get that he is going to muff a few and potentially lead to a damaging turnover. But he is also almost certain to rip off more than a few big returns.

    It just seems that while Switzer's floor is pretty high because he has reliable hands; his ceiling is so low because he does not (can not?) get open down the field and he really isn't a threat to do all that much in the return game besides not fumble.

    Folks seem to want Gentry. Grimble, and Dobbs off the roster because they don't contribute. Why all the love for this guy? He seems like a great human being, but he is barely an NFL football player so far in his career.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    The last thing that I want of a returner is fumble the ball ... It was a problem for Eli Rogers and even Spencer.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,254

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Quote Originally Posted by polamalubeast View Post
    The last time that I want of a returner is fumble the ball ... It was a problem for Eli Rogers and even Spencer.
    Fair enough and a critical point. But I just have a hard time buying there is no one out there in the pool of potential NFL players that can not reliably catch a punt AND bring something to the table at another position.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array title="JimHarbaugh'ssoakedtissue has a reputation beyond repute"> JimHarbaugh'ssoakedtissue's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Gender
    Posts
    5,871

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Like 86Ward said he is a chain mover with those quick slants.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array title="pczach has a reputation beyond repute"> pczach's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Gender
    Posts
    9,766

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    Fair enough and a critical point. But I just have a hard time buying there is no one out there in the pool of potential NFL players that can not reliably catch a punt AND bring something to the table at another position.

    I like Switzer...I really do. But Rogers is the better pure receiver when healthy. The problem is that he has been banged up a fair amount of the time.

    I think that Switzer's availability, his ability to return kicks, and his overall team presence is probably what tipped the scales for the team.

    I'm guessing that was what they were thinking.

  8. #8
    The voice of reason Array title="GoSlash27 has a reputation beyond repute"> GoSlash27's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Iowegia
    Posts
    6,034

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Mojo,
    I think you've already hit on the high points. He's tough, he's got good hands, he's a positive influence in the locker room, he can do punt returns, he doesn't fumble. In addition, he's very loyal to this organization for giving him a chance and he's fearless.
    All of these attributes taken together are why he's on the team. Slot receiver and punt returner are the two most dangerous jobs a WR can do. He gladly does them both, reliably if not spectacularly. He doesn't get big YAC or anything, but he moves the chains.
    "You've heard people brag about 'being in the zone'. They don't know what the Hell being in the zone is about. I played in the NFL for 15 years and I was only in the zone that one time." - "Mean" Joe Greene on the 1974 playoff victory over Oakland

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Ryan Switzer had 36 catch on 44 targets...Of course, not a lot of big play (7 yards per catch only) but it's almost an automatic completion when Ben target Switzer (81%)

    Let's hope he's going to have more yards per catch this year, but Eli Rogers has not done much since his 2016 season ....

    https://www.pro-football-reference.c...R/RogeEl00.htm

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array title="FrancoLambert has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Witness Protection in South Kakalaki
    Gender
    Posts
    1,446

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Always felt the Steelers (and Ben) liked Switzer more than Eli.
    I thought Holton might push Switzer off the team because of his big play potential, but out of the three, Switzer’s the best and most reliable punt return man.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array title="Hawkman has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Virginia
    Gender
    Posts
    3,956

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    Fair enough and a critical point. But I just have a hard time buying there is no one out there in the pool of potential NFL players that can not reliably catch a punt AND bring something to the table at another position.
    AB

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by GoSlash27 View Post
    Mojo,
    I think you've already hit on the high points. He's tough, he's got good hands, he's a positive influence in the locker room, he can do punt returns, he doesn't fumble. In addition, he's very loyal to this organization for giving him a chance and he's fearless.
    All of these attributes taken together are why he's on the team. Slot receiver and punt returner are the two most dangerous jobs a WR can do. He gladly does them both, reliably if not spectacularly. He doesn't get big YAC or anything, but he moves the chains.
    ....and Ben likes him.

  12. #12
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    Here is the thing, he isn't really good at anything. He is exceedingly average on punt returns. I'm not going to even worry about kick returns, because that is basically useless. Switzer was 13/19 ranked guys in punt returns last year with an 8.4 average (#19 was 5.7 yards). So he is 3 strides better than the worst guy that caught enough punts to qualify. 3rd in the league in fair catches. So Switzer best skill is just settling under a punt and putting his arm up in the air.

    https://www.footballdb.com/stats/sta...t=25&sort=prfc

    I'm not even all that sad about waving goodbye to Eli Rogers. It is just that if you are going to keep a small WR on the roster because he is good at returns, than I would have kept Spencer 8 times out of 10. I get that he is going to muff a few and potentially lead to a damaging turnover. But he is also almost certain to rip off more than a few big returns.

    It just seems that while Switzer's floor is pretty high because he has reliable hands; his ceiling is so low because he does not (can not?) get open down the field and he really isn't a threat to do all that much in the return game besides not fumble.

    Folks seem to want Gentry. Grimble, and Dobbs off the roster because they don't contribute. Why all the love for this guy? He seems like a great human being, but he is barely an NFL football player so far in his career.
    Rogers wasn’t really great as a receiver, poor as a return guy. He had a ton of potential...like AB type flash but never developed and wasn’t dependable. Spencer seemed to maybe be a good return guy, seemed to be pretty below average as a receiver. So you keep the veteran guy who is average at both and you add a roster spot for one of the LBs.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    It will be only the 3rd season in the NFL for Ryan Switzer,so he can be better...He will never be a star in this league, but he can be useful for severals little thing and also be a good presence in the locker room.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array title="cubanstogie has a reputation beyond repute"> cubanstogie's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    2,535

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    He’s like a utility infielder in baseball who can play any position and pinch run due to good base running. I think Ben bromance with him helps his cause. A possession type receiver who’s reliable, I have no problem with him taking roster spot but don’t have any big expectations for a 4th receiver anyways. I also wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t make full season on team.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array title="Six Rings is a splendid one to behold">

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Gender
    Posts
    1,124

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Quote Originally Posted by polamalubeast View Post
    Ryan Switzer had 36 catch on 44 targets...Of course, not a lot of big play (7 yards per catch only) but it's almost an automatic completion when Ben target Switzer (81%)

    Let's hope he's going to have more yards per catch this year, but Eli Rogers has not done much since his 2016 season ....

    https://www.pro-football-reference.c...R/RogeEl00.htm

    That is his role, get 5-8 yards and convert on a high %. Our nickel and dime player who's always open like 7-11.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Rogers was one of the “leaks” from last season’s locker room fiasco. He would have had to have been really, really ridiculously good to have been kept.

    Plus, I read a PFF stat last year (it’s PFF, so take it for what it is) that Switzer converted the highest percentage of receptions on third-down targets of any receiver in the NFL. (Or, some crazy stat like that.)

    SUMMATION:
    Switzer may not have the raw numbers of Rogers, but does indeed Switzer possess a few skills worth keeping. And, Switzer is 100% a “team-first” guy.

  17. #17
    Junior Member Array title="lt194camaroz is an unknown quantity at this point">

    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Gender
    Posts
    29

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    Hopefully Dionte Johnson gets healthy soon and pushes switzer down the depth chart and makes him only relevant ad a returner and a short yardage receiver that specializes in coming in and converting to get first downs. I know hes not a down field threat but he does well in short yardage bc of his quickness. He's quick and shifty but I think his overall top speed is slower making him less effective.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array title="EzraTank has a reputation beyond repute"> EzraTank's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    7,614

    Re: Some fancy numbers on Ryan Switzer

    I think there are linebackers in this league that could literally blow him over if they tried hard enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •