Easy to blame Roethlisberger, but that doesn't mean it's right
By JIM WEXELL
It was Week 13 of the 2017 season and the Steelers were cruising along with a 9-2 record. They had won three of those games by three points, and were about to win another by the same margin that Monday night. But they also lost Ryan Shazier, the heart and soul and best player on their defense, to a broken neck.
At the end of that season, they lost Le'Veon Bell, the motor of the Steelers running game. Bell proclaimed he was holding out for the benefit of future running backs, but his altruistic talk became nothing more than blather when he informed the Steelers he would play the final six games of the 2018 season only if they pay him the full $14.5 million of his franchise tag.
And after that season, they lost Mike Munchak. The offensive line coach, who was approaching Dick LeBeau-level love and respect not only in the locker room but in the city, had a chance to work and live near his daughter, her husband and their children, in the Denver area. So he accepted a lateral move and the Steelers lost the figurehead of the backbone of their team.
Now, they are in the process of losing their best playmaker, Antonio Brown, who inexplicably quit during the final week of the season. I called it a 50-50 chance they would trade him, but after team president Art Rooney II came out and said neither he nor Mike Tomlin had heard from Brown, and that a trade was possible, I upped the odds to 70-30 that Brown will be traded. And that's being generous toward the side of reconciliation.
People in the organization still believe reconciliation is possible, but they're holding their breath in anticipation of Brown unleashing his side of the story.
It's been "reported" by ex-players in the national media - people I've never seen in the locker room - that Brown's dissatisfaction stems from Ben Roethlisberger for any of the following reasons:
to read rest of article:
https://247sports.com/nfl/pittsburgh...ama-127949110/