Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33

Thread: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="SteelerEmpire has a spectacular aura about"> SteelerEmpire's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    3,271

    Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Obama's health care overhaul has divided the nation, and Republicans believe their call for repeal will help them win elections in November. But the picture's not that clear cut.

    A new AP poll finds that Americans who think the law should have done more outnumber those who think the government should stay out of health care by 2-to-1... ..."Republican legislators' passion to repeal the legislation is understandable if they are paying attention to members of their own party," Krosnick added. "But if they want to be responsive to all Americans, there are more Democrats and independents than there are Republicans."

    LINK: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...terstitialskip

  2. #2
    U.S. AIR FORCE Array title="Hindes204 has much to be proud of"> Hindes204's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,278

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 43% of Adults believe the private sector has the best chance of keeping health care costs down and the quality of care up, down slightly from November of last year.
    But 37% trust the federal government more in these areas. Another 20% are undecided.
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._costs_quality



    Its all in how the question is asked, I can play this poll game all day




  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="SteelerEmpire has a spectacular aura about"> SteelerEmpire's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    3,271

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 43% of Adults believe the private sector has the best chance of keeping health care costs down and the quality of care up, down slightly from November of last year.
    But 37% trust the federal government more in these areas. Another 20% are undecided.
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._costs_quality



    Its all in how the question is asked, I can play this poll game all day
    ------------------------------------------

    Actually competition within the private sector still remains with the over-haul, if not "expanded" as some states only had one insurer over the entire state. In addition, there will be no "government option". It still will be competition between current insurers, but with just "increased government regulations" to avoid past "for profit" abuses by insurers.
    As far as the poll is concerned, in reality, "repealing" of the health care law passed is a dream being sold to those that listen to it... it will be next to impossible... Republicans would basically have to have control of all three branch's of government and at the levels that the Dems did/currently do for that to happen. With the demographics of the country changing 'not' in favor of the Republicans, I really don't see that happening...

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="Godfather has a brilliant future">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast
    Posts
    3,393

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    With the demographics of the country changing 'not' in favor of the Republicans, I really don't see that happening...
    It's not that far outside the realm of possibility. The R's should get to at least 48 seats this year. And the D's are BADLY exposed in 2012 and 2014.

    If the GOP is really smart, they'll pass a bill that does the following:

    - Repeals the individual mandate

    - Allows HSA holders to spend their funds on any third party, not just spouses and dependents. (This would result in massive savings because it would make mutual aid socieities stronger, and medical providers would just need to track the payments coming in instead of needing an army of employees to fight with deadbeat insurers).

    - Restores the allowable annual HSA contribution, undoing the Obamacare cuts

    - Allows individuals to buy plans with lifetime limits or high annual deductibles

    - Allows individuals to deduct premiums, so that people who don't get insurance at work can receive equal tax treatment

    - Allows states to opt out of Obamacare

    They could call it the "Restoring Patient Choice and Cost Control Act of 2011". Obama would veto it because he cares more about his ego than he does about the American people. That would be a real reform and would be highly popular, so blocking it would be political suicide for the Jackasses.

    The irony of all this is that if they'd just passed Medicare for All and a tax credit for people wanting to opt out and buy private insurance, they'd be in a lot less trouble.

  5. #5
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Actually, the original article is quite misleading.

    75% want "substantial" change in teh system. "Substantial change" does NOT mean change towards universal health coverage, or change towards the original Obama plan.

    I WANT SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE. Yet, the substantial change I WANT has nothing to do with what this article is pushing as "change."

    I want major lawsuit reform. I want the govt. medicare system to be scaled back and overhauled because it is driving price increases across the board. I want a complete change in govt. oversight of current insurance policies.

    This article is quite one-sided.


  6. #6
    Freakin Amazing! Array title="JonM229 will become famous soon enough"> JonM229's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI
    Gender
    Posts
    976

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Even if Republicans win every seat available this election, it won't be enough to override a Presidential veto if they pass a bill repealing the Health Care reforms.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array title="GodfatherofSoul is a jewel in the rough"> GodfatherofSoul's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Kansas City
    Gender
    Posts
    1,828

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    I've got the same problem with the health care bill. We all know what has to be done to reform the system, but Republicans want to stick with privatized health care. Since there wasn't a strong enough Democratic majority, we ended up with a weak compromise between doing nothing and real reform.

    I'm real curious about how you think Medicare is driving up the cost of health care when it covers the neediest of customers and cost *less* than privatized health care. I'm also curious about how you think lawsuit reform will affect the cost of health care and if you know what percentage of health care spending is attributed to lawsuits. In your own words please, don't just post links.

  8. #8
    U.S. AIR FORCE Array title="Hindes204 has much to be proud of"> Hindes204's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Gender
    Posts
    3,278

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    I'll take on the lawsuit reform question. To put it plainly, doctors are afraid to get sued so they continue to order unnecessary (and expensive) tests. It's called "defensive medicine". The last study I saw said that tort reform could save anywhere from 92 to 202 billion dollars. That's what would help reduce healthcare premiums




  9. #9
    Hophead Array title="SCSTILLER has a spectacular aura about"> SCSTILLER's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Charleston, SC via New Brighton, PA
    Gender
    Posts
    982

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by GodfatherofSoul View Post
    I've got the same problem with the health care bill. We all know what has to be done to reform the system, but Republicans want to stick with privatized health care. Since there wasn't a strong enough Democratic majority, we ended up with a weak compromise between doing nothing and real reform.

    I'm real curious about how you think Medicare is driving up the cost of health care when it covers the neediest of customers and cost *less* than privatized health care. I'm also curious about how you think lawsuit reform will affect the cost of health care and if you know what percentage of health care spending is attributed to lawsuits. In your own words please, don't just post links.
    Don't have time to find the article/report that I read about this but soon as I can I will track it down. The reason Medicare is driving up the cost of healthcare is because it is cheaper than privatized health care. What I mean by this is that Medicare tells the doctors what it is going to pay them for procedures, and it is only around 70% of the actual cost of said procedure. Now, the doctors/hospitals/clinics have to make up the difference somehow, so they can either bill the actual customer for the remaining difference, knowing full well that they won't get their money, then also/either pass the loss off to the insurance companies of other patients and make it up that way. So, in essence, Medicare not paying the full share is the reason health care costs are going up because the doctors have to make up the difference somehow.

    Also, like Hindes said, TORT reform needs to happen for any real healthcare costs to go down.
    "The mountains are calling and I must go!" -- John Muir

  10. #10
    Quest For Seven Array title="Mach1 has a reputation beyond repute"> Mach1's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Gender
    Posts
    5,428

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    The reason Medicare is driving up the cost of healthcare is because it is cheaper than privatized health care. What I mean by this is that Medicare tells the doctors what it is going to pay them for procedures, and it is only around 70% of the actual cost of said procedure.
    And thats the reason why a lot a doctors wont accept medicaid/medicare.


    Give a lib a fish--he eats for a day

    Teach a lib to fish--he is back the next day asking for more free fish.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  11. #11
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by GodfatherofSoul View Post
    I've got the same problem with the health care bill. We all know what has to be done to reform the system, but Republicans want to stick with privatized health care. Since there wasn't a strong enough Democratic majority, we ended up with a weak compromise between doing nothing and real reform.

    I'm real curious about how you think Medicare is driving up the cost of health care when it covers the neediest of customers and cost *less* than privatized health care. I'm also curious about how you think lawsuit reform will affect the cost of health care and if you know what percentage of health care spending is attributed to lawsuits. In your own words please, don't just post links.
    Im on my phone, so I'll make it short. 1. Tort reform. The threat of.a lawsuit must be covered with malpractice insurance. An ObGyn pays $500,000 a year IN PREMIUMS for coverage in some places. So, say 10 patients a day, three days a week, 50 weeks a year (docs need a couple days for educ., rounds, etc.) That is 1500 visits. To cover the insur. Prem. Alone, they have to charge $333. A visit. That doesn't count overhead, salaries of employees, etc. Etc. Tort reform can immed. fix that by dropping the overall bill by what? 50% maybe? Since prob. Half of every visit or MORE is going towards insur. From lawsuits.

    Medicare. Too comp. To do on a phone. Basically, though, all prices get driven up to then negotiate w the govt. On medicare allowable rates. Because med. Pays so low, the other rates are driven much higher to show both disparity and to cover a losing proposition.


  12. #12
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Preach, what should happen when doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?

  13. #13
    Quest For Seven Array title="Mach1 has a reputation beyond repute"> Mach1's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Gender
    Posts
    5,428

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    Preach, what should happen when doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?
    What should happen when the govt(IRS) screws up your healthcare and devastates a patients/family's life(s).


    Give a lib a fish--he eats for a day

    Teach a lib to fish--he is back the next day asking for more free fish.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array title="BnG_Hevn has much to be proud of"> BnG_Hevn's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,070

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach1 View Post
    What should happen when the govt(IRS) screws up your healthcare and devastates a patients/family's life(s).
    I'm sure there are some military vets that can answer that question.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array title="LLT has a reputation beyond repute"> LLT's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Gender
    Posts
    6,266

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Originally Posted by Vis
    Preach, what should happen when doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?

    Quote Originally Posted by BnG_Hevn View Post
    I'm sure there are some military vets that can answer that question.
    Bingo...If you want to see government controlled healthcare. Go to a VA clinic and ask the Vets how they like it. IT SUCKS!!!!
    "I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play"

    -- Jack Lambert --

  16. #16
    member since day 1 Array title="7SteelGal43 is a name known to all"> 7SteelGal43's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    birthplace of rock-n-roll
    Gender
    Posts
    1,748

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    yeah....like right off a cliff. Please repeal this abomination !
    Stay classy, leftnutz

  17. #17
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    Preach, what should happen when doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?
    First, what do you mean by "doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?" Is it that the Doctor has a choice between two legitimate paths of treatment, took one, and it didn't work? Sorry, that isn't lawsuit worthy IMO. Is it that the Doctor did something radical in surgery because an unforeseen circumstance came up... and he had to make a judgment call? Nope, not lawsuit worthy.

    There is a major difference between "second guessing" and negligence. Most malpractice lawsuits, are for the former, and IMO, are frivolous. The latter, is a much tougher threshold. However, if it can be proved, then there is no problem with a payout large enough that it helps the person the rest of their life.

    If the malpractice is malicious (such as the Dr. carving his initials on the person during surgery, which happend a few years ago), then since that is a much higher threshold, there should be no limit to the payout. Conversely, the insurance companies also would have the ability to limit their responsibilities to only the first two thresholds, thus limiting their exposure.

    Heck, even Canada recognized the problem with lawsuits
    Fees are lower than in the United States for a number of reasons. Two of these are that Canada’s highest courts have set limits on awards and the country’s liability laws make establishing professional negligence more difficult. Another is that the physicians’ insurance company defends lawsuits very vigorously.
    http://www.loc.gov/law/help/medical-...ity/canada.php

    Matter of fact, if the fed. govt. wanted to set up a similar system to the Canadian system, then they would allow a national insurance organization for all American doctors and Hospitals, without regulations dealing with the states... then reimburse every doctor about 85% of their premiums.


  18. #18
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
    First, what do you mean by "doctors screw up and devastate a patient's life?" Is it that the Doctor has a choice between two legitimate paths of treatment, took one, and it didn't work? Sorry, that isn't lawsuit worthy IMO. Is it that the Doctor did something radical in surgery because an unforeseen circumstance came up... and he had to make a judgment call? Nope, not lawsuit worthy.

    There is a major difference between "second guessing" and negligence. Most malpractice lawsuits, are for the former, and IMO, are frivolous. The latter, is a much tougher threshold. However, if it can be proved, then there is no problem with a payout large enough that it helps the person the rest of their life.

    If the malpractice is malicious (such as the Dr. carving his initials on the person during surgery, which happend a few years ago), then since that is a much higher threshold, there should be no limit to the payout. Conversely, the insurance companies also would have the ability to limit their responsibilities to only the first two thresholds, thus limiting their exposure.

    Heck, even Canada recognized the problem with lawsuits http://www.loc.gov/law/help/medical-...ity/canada.php

    Matter of fact, if the fed. govt. wanted to set up a similar system to the Canadian system, then they would allow a national insurance organization for all American doctors and Hospitals, without regulations dealing with the states... then reimburse every doctor about 85% of their premiums.
    The problem is you're wrong. You have a common misconception if you believe most are frivolous but common doesn't make it right. But lets say the negligence is real, Dr is drunk and takes out wrong part leading to a lifetime of medical bills. Then what? What tort reform stops truly frivolous suits but allows legitimate ones to go forward unencumbered?

  19. #19
    Quest For Seven Array title="Mach1 has a reputation beyond repute"> Mach1's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Gender
    Posts
    5,428

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Grasping at straws.


    Give a lib a fish--he eats for a day

    Teach a lib to fish--he is back the next day asking for more free fish.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  20. #20
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach1 View Post
    Grasping at straws.
    Any system put in place needs to filter the garbage cases and allow the real ones to go forward. Put on whatever thinking cap you might have and suggest a system that does both - different from what there is now (if you know what that is) or bow out of adult discussions.

  21. #21
    Geek God Array title="X-Terminator has a reputation beyond repute"> X-Terminator's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    9,152

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    The problem is you're wrong. You have a common misconception if you believe most are frivolous but common doesn't make it right. But lets say the negligence is real, Dr is drunk and takes out wrong part leading to a lifetime of medical bills. Then what? What tort reform stops truly frivolous suits but allows legitimate ones to go forward unencumbered?
    We'd need to clearly define what is negligence and what is not. Problem is, it's difficult to do so because there's so much gray area. A surgeon can do everything by the book, no problems, mistakes, anything...but if the patient doesn't get relief or the problem isn't corrected, he can still sue the surgeon for negligence. I don't think that should be allowed. I also don't believe a surgeon or other doctor should lose everything he has if he does make a mistake that can be corrected with a follow-up treatment. Those cases should have caps on liability so that the patient is compensated for his inconvenience, yet the doctor receives "punishment" for his mistake. However, if it is gross negligence that results in a lifetime of problems for the patient, then those cases should be unencumbered.








  22. #22
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by X-Terminator View Post
    We'd need to clearly define what is negligence and what is not. Problem is, it's difficult to do so because there's so much gray area. A surgeon can do everything by the book, no problems, mistakes, anything...but if the patient doesn't get relief or the problem isn't corrected, he can still sue the surgeon for negligence. I don't think that should be allowed. I also don't believe a surgeon or other doctor should lose everything he has if he does make a mistake that can be corrected with a follow-up treatment. Those cases should have caps on liability so that the patient is compensated for his inconvenience, yet the doctor receives "punishment" for his mistake. However, if it is gross negligence that results in a lifetime of problems for the patient, then those cases should be unencumbered.
    You are wrong. If a doctor follows the standard of care regardless of outcome there is no negl. Even negl doctors don't lose everything They usually don't lose anything because cases are settled with confidentiality agreements so the next patient has no way of knowing the dr is a frequent screw-up and the settlement isn't greater than the ins coverage. The dr pays nada. You buy into the sales pitch of the ins industry. Caps don't prevent frivolous suits, they limit the recovery of the worst cases. Frivolous suits get tossed on summary judgment in most cases. Med mal cases, in most states, require another dr swear that the standard of care was violated before suit can be brought.

  23. #23
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Here's SC law:

    Medical malpractice lawsuits have specific requirements that must be satisfied in order for a genuine issue of material fact to exist. David, 367 S.C. at 247, 626 S.E.2d at 3. Specifically, a patient alleging medical malpractice must provide evidence, through expert testimony, showing (1) the generally recognized and accepted practices and procedures that would be followed by average, competent practitioners in the physician's field of medicine under the same or similar circumstances, [*16] and (2) that the physician departed from the recognized and generally accepted standards. Id. at 247, 626 S.E.2d at 4. Additionally, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's departure from such generally recognized practices and procedures was the proximate cause of his alleged injuries and damages. Id. at 248, 626 S.E.2d at 4.

  24. #24
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    The problem is you're wrong. You have a common misconception if you believe most are frivolous but common doesn't make it right. But lets say the negligence is real, Dr is drunk and takes out wrong part leading to a lifetime of medical bills. Then what? What tort reform stops truly frivolous suits but allows legitimate ones to go forward unencumbered?
    Actually, I am not wrong. I got most of that information from lawyers defending lawsuits against doctors.

    For instance, 51.7% of lawsuits from ER visits are "Misdiagnosis, failure to diagnose, or delayed diagnose". Unless truly negligent, I am sorry, but that is simply frivolous. We have set a standard that says Doctors are supposed to be All-knowning, and then sue them when they are not.

    That also runs counter to a underlying medical truism, "When you hear hoofbeats, look for a horse." Once in a while it is a Zebra, but unless you are in a Zoo, or in africa, WHY IN THE WORLD would you look for a Zebra? But today, Doctors are being sued because they didn't. Thus, they order tests that are completely unnecessary for 99 percent of the patients, so that when the 1 percent is caught, by pure luck mostly, they aren't sued.

    As to the rest of your question, I already answered it my previous post.


  25. #25
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
    Actually, I am not wrong. I got most of that information from lawyers defending lawsuits against doctors.

    For instance, 51.7% of lawsuits from ER visits are "Misdiagnosis, failure to diagnose, or delayed diagnose". Unless truly negligent, I am sorry, but that is simply frivolous. We have set a standard that says Doctors are supposed to be All-knowning, and then sue them when they are not.

    That also runs counter to a underlying medical truism, "When you hear hoofbeats, look for a horse." Once in a while it is a Zebra, but unless you are in a Zoo, or in africa, WHY IN THE WORLD would you look for a Zebra? But today, Doctors are being sued because they didn't. Thus, they order tests that are completely unnecessary for 99 percent of the patients, so that when the 1 percent is caught, by pure luck mostly, they aren't sued.

    As to the rest of your question, I already answered it my previous post.
    I posted the law. Does it match your post in the slightest? I have handled med mal cases on both sides.

  26. #26
    Senior Member Array title="LLT has a reputation beyond repute"> LLT's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Gender
    Posts
    6,266

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    I posted the law. Does it match your post in the slightest? I have handled med mal cases on both sides.
    But lets be honest...it is a lawyers job to FIND the loophole. To PROVE that the doctor was listening for a horse instead of a zebra and to present it to a judge or jury in such a way as to convince the act as negligence.
    "I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play"

    -- Jack Lambert --

  27. #27
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Here's the facts from an actual "failure to diagnose" case I once had. Patient presents with blisters on his arms, hands, legs, feet, and tongue. He was having an allergic reaction to penicillin. The triage nurse in the ER, as well as the ems people noted all the above but when the ER dr got there he didn't look at the file but merely asked what the patient did for a living - he washed dishes at a Shoneys. The Dr decided it was a chemical burn from the soap (how that got on feet and tongue he didn't explain since the dr never looked at them as his notes proved) Dr pumped him full of antibiatics - co-reactive with penicillin thereby making the situation worse (its called toxic epidermal necrolysis) and sent him home in an ambulance. The infected lesions on his hands made it impossible for the guy to wipe himself even if the dr had been right. Patient's brother found him rotting in his bed two days later. He was air-lifted to a burn-unit two states away where he dies eleven unimaginably painful days later as his skin burned off from the inside. That one would fit in your stat, wouldn't it?

  28. #28
    The Oncoming Storm Array title="Vis will become famous soon enough"> Vis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,487

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by LLT View Post
    But lets be honest...it is a lawyers job to FIND the loophole. To PROVE that the doctor was listening for a horse instead of a zebra and to present it to a judge or jury in such a way as to convince the act as negligence.
    And it's the other lawyers job to stop it. But here's the kicker - med mal cases are so expensive to prove with all the experts needed that lawyers don't take even legitimate ones unless the damages are huge. If we lose we get nothing and we don't get the tens of thousands we spend to get that far back

  29. #29
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Quote Originally Posted by Vis View Post
    Here's the facts from an actual "failure to diagnose" case I once had. Patient presents with blisters on his arms, hands, legs, feet, and tongue. He was having an allergic reaction to penicillin. The triage nurse in the ER, as well as the ems people noted all the above but when the ER dr got there he didn't look at the file but merely asked what the patient did for a living - he washed dishes at a Shoneys. The Dr decided it was a chemical burn from the soap (how that got on feet and tongue he didn't explain since the dr never looked at them as his notes proved) Dr pumped him full of antibiatics - co-reactive with penicillin thereby making the situation worse (its called toxic epidermal necrolysis) and sent him home in an ambulance. The infected lesions on his hands made it impossible for the guy to wipe himself even if the dr had been right. Patient's brother found him rotting in his bed two days later. He was air-lifted to a burn-unit two states away where he dies eleven unimaginably painful days later as his skin burned off from the inside. That one would fit in your stat, wouldn't it?
    Now, I would want to know if the Doctors notes stated WHY he didn't look at the other blisters. And, on the tongue is easy to understand. Ever see someone pour soap and a dust cloud come up? Feet... just depends on what he was wearing.. or if water soaked through. Those are all the questions I would FIRST want to be answered if I was on the jury. Furthermore, was the Dr. told that the patient was on Penicillin? If not, then Horses before Zebras. That is the patients responsibility to inform the doctor of those things. My mother has a list of EVERY medicine she is taking, and when she goes to the ER, we MAKE SURE they ALL see it, because that is my responsibility. If he did, then the onus falls on the doctor to say why he didn't check it out.

    If it came about that the doctor simply ignored protocol, then that is negligence. If it came out that the doctor knew of the sores on the feet and tongue, but, saw the blisters on the hands, wasn't presented with the facts that the guy was on Penicillin, and thus concluded that they did INDEED look like chemical burns... then it is the fault of the patient for not informing the Dr. of the medicine he was taking.

    The suffering the patient endured thereafter again has no bearing on whether the Dr. was guilty. I believe the idea behind justice, is that emotion is left out. So however much I sympathize with the man's pain, it has no place in the decision making process. Yet, I have to ask, when the case was argued... was it argued on a factual level, an emotional level, or both? Were pictures of his sores on his hands presented, or were pictures of his entire body after 11 days presented, to sway the jury? For me, to do anything but present emotionless facts is to distort the system, and part of the entire problem not just with healthcare reform, but tort reform in general.

    The key ingredient that is left out of the civil court system today, is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. If this guy didn't share his meds, its his responsibility, not the Docs. I had a friend whose wife went to McDonalds and ordered Hot Chocolate. Yep, you guessed it. She gave it to her daughter, her daughter spilled it, burning herself, and they sued McDonalds. It was settled for 3-5 thousand dollars. The wife actually said to me, "It was so hot, I wouldn't even drink it". To which I practically was bleeding biting my tongue... because IMO she should have been countersued AND CPS CALLED for endangering a child. Personal Responsibility.

    A woman I know was in a store looking at a mirror. She picked it up, then dropped it on her toe. She went to the manager, told him what happened, and demanded that they pay for her X-rays at the hospital, which they did. IMO, the manager should have asked her to show him the mirror. Then, if there was even a scratch, he should have CHARGED HER FOR THE DAMAGE and then kick her out of the store--why? Because she is too clumsy to hang on to a mirror. Personal Responsibility.

    That, my friend, is the big issue here. I believe doctors need to take personal responsibility when something goes wrong. I believe the patient needs to take A WHOLE LOT MORE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY when they screw up the diagnosis by not giving the Doctor enough info, or acting like an idiot (or the family, as a lawsuit where a man's family requested no new X-rays be done, and instead transfer the man to another hospitale, and then when the Dr. did that, the guy dies, and the family sues the Dr. FOR UNSTABLE TRANSFER. Personal responsibility. The family made the wrong decision. Don't blame the doc.


  30. #30
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,834

    Re: Poll:Repeal ? Many Wish Health Care Would Go Further

    Here is another example of "Personal Responsibility"

    Presentation
    A 35-year-old woman came to a family practice clinic on July 31 with complaints of right arm and finger numbness and neck pain. She had a history of lumbar surgery six years ago and lumbar fusion five years ago. The patient also reported that she was seeing a psychiatrist for anxiety, depression, and mood swings. She was currently taking Paxil 40 mg and Thorazine 150 mg. The patient stated that her neck felt like her back did before the fusion.
    Physician action
    A physician’s assistant (PA) examined the patient and found that she was tender on palpation of the cervical vertebrae and shoulder with a tight trapezius muscle. She was noted to have decreased range of motion of the neck and decreased right arm strength. The initial assessment was neck pain, shoulder pain, neuropathy, and muscle weakness to the right arm. She was prescribed a Medrol dose pack, Darvocet for pain, and Soma for muscle spasms. The office scheduled an MRI of the cervical spine on August 5.
    On August 1, the patient called the office complaining of pain. Another PA, with the approval of the supervising physician, called in a prescription for Lortab 10/500 #20 for the patient. The patient did not keep her appointment for the MRI that was scheduled on August 5. On August 6, the patient was
    N
    ot all medical liability suits filed against physicians are prompted by medical errors. Patients often cite interpersonal aspects of care, such as poor communication or feeling rushed, as central to the decision to initiate litigation. 1
    “Patients do not necessarily file lawsuits because they believe they were harmed by a medical error. They sue because they believe they were harmed by a medical error and something else happened during their care,” says Jane Holeman, vice president of risk management at TMLT.
    This publication will describe 10 common errors that can increase the risk of a malpractice suit, and offer risk management techniques to address these issues. Included with each error is a TMLT closed claim study that demonstrates how the error led to a lawsuit alleging medical liability.
    4
    prescribed Phenergan, Soma, and Lortab, but Family Physician A denied the request for Darvocet. The patient again called and obtained refills for Phenergan, Soma, and Lortab on August 9.
    On August 12, the patient called for refills — Lortab, Soma, Restoril, and Paxil were prescribed with the understanding that no more medications would be prescribed until her MRI was completed. Office staff then contacted the patient’s psychiatrist to determine what medication he was prescribing for the patient. The psychiatrist would not respond to their call or fill out the medication form that was sent. The psychiatrist noted that the patient had signed a form that would not allow him to release any information about her care and treatment.
    The patient failed to show for the MRI that was scheduled for August 19. When she called on August 23 seeking a refill for Soma, Family Physician B denied the request because the patient had not obtained the MRI.
    On August 23, the MRI scan of the cervical spine showed a large right paramedian disc protrusion at C6-7 with a mild impression on the anterolateral aspect of the spinal cord. There was also a large paramedian disc protrusion at C5-6 producing mild neuroforamenal stenosis and pressing upon the right anterolateral aspect of the cord. The MRI results showed changes that would explain the patient’s pain. On August 26, Family Physician B called the pharmacy to approve another 5-day supply of Phenergan, Lortab, and Soma.
    The patient called the office on August 28 stating that her pain medications were not strong enough. Family Physician B requested that she return to the clinic for a follow-up visit. The patient came that day and complained of neck pain and numbness in the right arm. Family Physician B performed a complete physical exam. He noted that her right arm was weaker than her left, and the right trapezius muscle was tender to palpation. The patient mentioned that Darvocet had not helped her in the past; but Oxycontin had provided relief. The physician diagnosed cervical disc disease, hypertension, and fatigue. He prescribed 40 mg of Oxycontin to be taken twice daily; one Soma every six to eight hours; and for her to keep a log of her blood pressure. Additionally, he noted that he would schedule an appointment with the neurosurgeon for September 26. He ordered a follow-up visit in two to three weeks for a blood pressure check.
    At this visit, Family Physician B specifically remembered telling the patient not to take other medication when she took Oxycontin. He also remembered telling her to begin by taking only one pill per day though he wrote the prescription for two pills per day. He recalled providing specific patient education about the risks of Oxycontin.
    On September 1, the patient called the clinic complaining of pain. The prescription for Darvocet was refilled to treat the patient’s breakthrough pain. The patient’s psychiatrist prescribed a 30-day supply of Restoril to the patient on September 2.
    Today’s visit
    Patient’s name _____________________________________________ Date of birth __________________
    Main reason for today’s visit:
    Other concerns I would like to discuss if there is time:
    Please check all that apply:
    _____ I have prescriptions to be refilled ______ I need the attached forms filled out
    _____ I need a school or work excuse ______ I need a referral for my insurance company
    This form can help prompt patients to state the reason for their visit.
    5
    The following day, the patient’s husband found his wife in the garage passed out and covered in urine. He explained that since he found her at 2 a.m., he thought her condition was a side effect of drowsiness. Neither the patient nor her husband notified any medical providers of this incident.
    On September 5, the patient was found dead by her minor children on their return home from school. The medical examiner found that the cause of death was an accidental mixed-drug overdose from Oxycontin and Darvocet. The pathologist stated that he believed the patient consumed Oxycontin and Darvocet well in excess of the instructions in the prescription, and that this was not a case of accidentally taking an extra pill or two. He did not believe it was a suicide because the patient did not consume all the pills from the bottle or leave a note. The cause of death was also not a homicide or natural, so he was left with accident as the only choice when completing the death certificate. Based on the toxicology results, the patient took at least 8 to 10 Oxycontin and at least 6 to 8 Darvocet on the morning of her death.
    Allegations
    Lawsuits were filed against Family Physician A, Family Physician B, and their practice. The plaintiffs alleged that the physicians failed to realize that the patient was a drug abuser and should have taken steps to place the patient under long-term pain management care.
    Lawsuits were also filed against the psychiatrist, the pharmacy and pharmacist who filled the patient’s prescriptions, and the physician’s assistant at the family practice clinic.
    Legal implications
    Continued below


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •