Originally Posted by
fansince'76
By the same token, which part of Goodell's history in general regarding player discipline should instill confidence that Bryant's case has actually been handled competently and fairly?
In regard to player discipline, Goodell has an established history of making shit up as he goes along and it's usually dictated by the level of media "outrage" a specific player's case generates as to how he handles it. And it's also the absolutely wrong way to handle player discipline.
Yes, Martavis Bryant is a knucklehead, but Goodell is an incompetent assclown and IMO, the worst commissioner in professional sports by a pretty good margin.
Personally, I'm certainly not prepared to give Goodell or the league any benefit of the doubt.