Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="stillers4me has a reputation beyond repute"> stillers4me's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shitzinnati
    Gender
    Posts
    24,867

    Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    It's typically a grueling task for an NFL coach to finalize his 53-man roster.


    For Steelers coach Mike Tomlin, it wasn't difficult at all this year, and he has Le'Veon Bell and Martavis Bryant to thank.


    With Bell suspended for the first two games and Bryant for the first four, Tomlin had two roster spots at his disposal that he wouldn't have had ordinarily. That made determining the roster rather easy.


    “You often spend a lot of time debating on the guys from 50 through 55, and having those two additional spots minimized that discussion,” Tomlin said during his weekly news conference Saturday.


    The likely beneficiaries: undrafted rookie free agent wide receiver Tyler Murphy and fullback Roosevelt Nix.............




  2. #2
    Senior Member Array title="TD's & Beer has a brilliant future"> TD's & Beer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Gender
    Posts
    1,719

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    IMO it was easy because they couldn't fill a 43 man team with what they had. Weakest Steelers bench I have seen in a long time.

    Remember when teams would line up to pick off our cuts, with a good chance at finding a starter, especially on defense? Not no more.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="TD's & Beer has a brilliant future"> TD's & Beer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Gender
    Posts
    1,719

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    5 biggest names cut from the Steelers roster

    RB Josh Harris
    S Gerod Holliman
    OL Doug Legursky
    CB Kevin Fogg
    DL Ethan Hemer

    http://steelerswire.usatoday.com/201...eelers-roster/

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="Cyphon25 is a name known to all">

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    548

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    Couldn't have been that easy if they couldn't figure out that cutting Archer and Jones was a good idea.

  5. #5
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    Quote Originally Posted by TD's & Beer View Post
    5 biggest names cut from the Steelers roster

    RB Josh Harris
    S Gerod Holliman
    OL Doug Legursky
    CB Kevin Fogg
    DL Ethan Hemer

    http://steelerswire.usatoday.com/201...eelers-roster/

    Reports are that Legursky has a hand injury and can't practice?


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  6. #6
    Steelers fan, circa 1985 Array title="BigNastyDefense is a name known to all"> BigNastyDefense's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Clowns Town, Ohio
    Gender
    Posts
    2,653

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    Quote Originally Posted by TD's & Beer View Post
    IMO it was easy because they couldn't fill a 43 man team with what they had. Weakest Steelers bench I have seen in a long time.

    Remember when teams would line up to pick off our cuts, with a good chance at finding a starter, especially on defense? Not no more.
    I think a lot of that has to do with the expansion of the league. The league is at 32 teams. That's 1,696 players total on 53 man rosters. Only 704 of those players are starters on offense/defense. That's 64 players that are either punters or kickers as starters. Now of all these 704 starters, how many are superstars? How many are average at best, and how many are just bad but start because the team is weak in that position?

    The Steelers and Ravens cut James Harrison multiple times before he finally stuck on the roster, then he spent a few years riding the pine and playing special teams behind Joey Porter. The honest truth is, when guys are cut at the cut to 53, few players are getting signed to the 53 man roster anyhow. Teams are looking at their depth, seeing who's available, and signing who fits their system and their depth to the practice squads. The Steelers obviously felt that some guys cut from other teams were going to be a better fit. Truth is, most of these guys that were cut won't see a 53 man roster and if they do, they won't be active on Sundays anyhow.

    RIP Marianne "HTG" - You'll Always Be With Us
    Follow me on Twitter @Blue_Collar_Guy

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array title="TD's & Beer has a brilliant future"> TD's & Beer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Gender
    Posts
    1,719

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    I don't do math and no alibi's can help this team defend the pass.

    Better players can.

  8. #8
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,180

    Re: Analysis: For Steelers, making roster cuts was easy part

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    Reports are that Legursky has a hand injury and can't practice?
    I think a call to Fernando's agent is justified then. Already thin at center. Do we want another 2013 start?



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •