Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    LATROBE – There have been some pretty good trios of receivers in the NFL over the years, but having three 1,000-yard receivers on the same team was only done five times.

    The Steelers feel they might have a group capable of reaching that plateau, which was last done in 2008 by the Arizona Cardinals.
    With All-Pro Antonio Brown and emerging star Martavis Bryant, who had 549 yards on 26 receptions in 10 games as a rookie, it’s easy to see Pittsburgh having two 1,000-yard receivers in 2015.

    “We’re asking him to do more, to move around a little bit, play frontside, backside, know things better,” quarterback Ben Roethlisberger said of Bryant at the team’s training camp at Saint Vincent College. “We’re going to count on him in the no-huddle. Last year, when we were calling stuff, he was asking everyone what to do. We feel more comfortable with him knowing what to do so, hopefully, we can translate that into playing faster.”

    The wild card might be third-year receiver Markus Wheaton.


    After seeing his rookie season derailed by a finger injury that needed a pair of surgeries, Wheaton had a solid second season - his first as a starter - catching 53 passes for 644 yards and two touchdowns.

    Reaching that 1,000-yard plateau is a goal for Wheaton, as it is for most receivers. And if he can do that, chances are good Pittsburgh could have three receivers reach that mark.

    “The potential is there,” Wheaton said. “It’s possible. But there’s a lot that goes into it.”

    It doesn’t hurt that Pittsburgh’s offensive coordinator, Todd Haley, also happened to be the coordinator in Arizona when Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin and Steve Breaston last accomplished the feat.

    With the same guy calling the plays, the possibilities are there.

    read more


    http://www.observer-reporter.com/art...gtCSLQ.twitter

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Wheaton has great hands. He he runs great routes. He just can't ever seem to get on the same page with BB.

    Once Wheaton & BB get comfortable with each other, he's going to be really, really good.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,271

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    Wheaton has great hands. He he runs great routes. He just can't ever seem to get on the same page with BB.

    Once Wheaton & BB get comfortable with each other, he's going to be really, really good.
    I think if the can kick him inside to the slot, he will flourish. Wheaton was bit miscast as "the deep threat". Bryant should fill that role now. Brown will do what Brown does. Leaving Wheaton to (hopefully) completely abuse nickel corners on intermediate stuff.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    To be honest, I would be very surprised to see Wheaton with 1,000 yards

    He is a good player, but Bell has more chances of having 1,000 receiver yards than Wheaton.Maybe not for this year but for the future.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by polamalubeast View Post
    To be honest, I would be very surprised to see Wheaton with 1,000 yards

    He is a good player, but Bell has more chances of having 1,000 receiver yards than Wheaton. Maybe not for this year but for the future.

    This is exactly what I was thinking, especially the part about Bell.

    Unless Ben throws for 5,000 yards and gets very even distribution, I don't see three WRs getting over the 1,000-yard mark, and Wheaton is probably the least likely.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array title="st33lersguy has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15,230

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Hmm, not so sure. With Brown, Bryant, Bell, Heath, and the likelihood they will try and work Coates in the best they can, I don't see Wheaton topping 1,000 yards

  7. #7
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Sorry, Wheaton. It's going to be AB, MB, and even LB getting most of the passes from BB



  8. #8
    Banned Array title="TeeTee is a glorious beacon of light">

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    I don't care if we have five or zero players with 1,000 yards; only thing I care about is winning rings. The Chargers had the most prolific offense in history in the 80's, but they had zero rings so who cares?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by TeeTee View Post
    I don't care if we have five or zero players with 1,000 yards; only thing I care about is winning rings. The Chargers had the most prolific offense in history in the 80's, but they had zero rings so who cares?
    The problem of its chargers were their dreadful defense.....

  10. #10
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by TeeTee View Post
    I don't care if we have five or zero players with 1,000 yards; only thing I care about is winning rings. The Chargers had the most prolific offense in history in the 80's, but they had zero rings so who cares?
    No argument here. The 2008 Steelers had one 1000 yd receiver and no 1000 yd rushers and won it all.


    But, with this unknown defense, the offense may have to carry a bigger load. There were many teams including the Chargers who had great offenses but couldn't win it all (83 Foreskins, 84 Dolphins, 90 Bills, 98 Vikings, 01 Rams, 07 Cheats** for example)



  11. #11
    Banned Array title="TeeTee is a glorious beacon of light">

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    1,260

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by polamalubeast View Post
    The problem of its chargers were their dreadful defense.....
    Precisely. And the problem with the 2014 Steelers? The same. Hopefully, it will be improved this season.

  12. #12
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    As others have said, I just don't see this happening. There's far too many available targets on this team and Ben spreads it around. Add in the great running game and it's not going to happen.
    I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play!- Jack Lambert

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array title="Rotorhead has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Denver
    Gender
    Posts
    4,748

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    It is certainly possible. I think Ben can eclipse 5k yards this year, that leaves 2k yds for Bell and TE's. And I am reading that Cortez is improving so maybe our Def will be that much better this season. Getting pumped for this season already. Hopefully they can win one more for Harrison!

  14. #14
    1 at a time Array title="Count Steeler has a reputation beyond repute"> Count Steeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Gender
    Posts
    18,009

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    He has to get a B into his name.

  15. #15
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Markus B. Wheaton


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Markus Bwheaton ... kind of rolls off the tongue, doesn't it?
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  17. #17
    Ghost Poster Array title="ALLD has a reputation beyond repute"> ALLD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Treasure Coast
    Posts
    11,816

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by TeeTee View Post
    I don't care if we have five or zero players with 1,000 yards; only thing I care about is winning rings. The Chargers had the most prolific offense in history in the 80's, but they had zero rings so who cares?
    You mean the Bills too.
    All Defense!

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Remember:
    Sometimes the slot/3rd receiver on a team can end up with an uncanny number of catches.

    AB will be double covered, and Bryant will likely draw safety help. Wheaton will likely have single coverage by the NB.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,271

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    Remember:
    Sometimes the slot/3rd receiver on a team can end up with an uncanny number of catches.

    AB will be double covered, and Bryant will likely draw safety help. Wheaton will likely have single coverage by the NB.
    Basically like how Welker used to rack up 100+ every season.

  20. #20
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    Remember:
    Sometimes the slot/3rd receiver on a team can end up with an uncanny number of catches.

    AB will be double covered, and Bryant will likely draw safety help. Wheaton will likely have single coverage by the NB.

    True, but not every team has a RB as capable as He Shall Be Le'Veon who is a dual threat.

    I'm not rooting against Wheaton to get a 1000 yds. I'd rather see Wheaton make TDs and be a threat in the red zone (even as a decoy), unless Sandra Bullock's Ex or Branchrickeyflower shows us something.



  21. #21
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    Basically like how Welker used to rack up 100+ every season.
    That is the EXACT name/person that I was thinking of.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by tube517 View Post
    True, but not every team has a RB as capable as He Shall Be Le'Veon who is a dual threat.

    I'm not rooting against Wheaton to get a 1000 yds. I'd rather see Wheaton make TDs and be a threat in the red zone (even as a decoy), unless Sandra Bullock's Ex or Branchrickeyflower shows us something.
    I hear you. Really, I do.

    It's just that I see BB having around 5500 passing yards.

    AB: 1300
    Bell: 1200
    Wheaton: 1000
    Bryant: 500 (but, also 12 TDs)
    Miller: 500
    Coates: 300
    Mrs. Bullock, Williams, Johnson, Spaeth, Archer: 600

  23. #23
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    I hear you. Really, I do.

    It's just that I see BB having around 5500 passing yards.

    AB: 1300
    Bell: 1200
    Wheaton: 999 3/4
    Bryant: 500 (but, also 12 TDs)
    Miller: 500
    Coates: 300
    Mrs. Bullock, Williams, Johnson, Spaeth, Archer: 600
    Fixed



  24. #24
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by tube517 View Post
    Fixed
    LOL

    That reminds me of the year that Shaun Alexander was ONE yard short of the rushing title, and Mike Holgrem sat him on the bench.

  25. #25
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    LOL

    That reminds me of the year that Shaun Alexander was ONE yard short of the rushing title, and Mike Holgrem sat him on the bench.
    Did you ever see Shaun Alexander and Tiki Barber in the same room?



  26. #26
    Steelers fan, circa 1985 Array title="BigNastyDefense is a name known to all"> BigNastyDefense's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Clowns Town, Ohio
    Gender
    Posts
    2,653

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    I can see it happening. I think Wheaton's quickness is going to give slot corners fits.

    However, AB is going to likely have 1400+ yards. I think Bryant will eclipse the 1000 yard mark because he's a deep threat. Bell is likely going to have around 1200 yards rushing and at least another 600 yards receiving. Heath Miller is going to get a healthy dose of targets. Wheaton can break the 1000 yard mark, but he's going to be at best option #4 behind AB, Bryant, and Bell...and could be option #4 behind Miller in many cases too.

    RIP Marianne "HTG" - You'll Always Be With Us
    Follow me on Twitter @Blue_Collar_Guy

  27. #27
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    I hear you. Really, I do.

    It's just that I see BB having around 5500 passing yards.

    AB: 1300
    Bell: 1200
    Wheaton: 1000
    Bryant: 500 (but, also 12 TDs)
    Miller: 500
    Coates: 300
    Mrs. Bullock, Williams, Johnson, Spaeth, Archer: 600
    Bell - 1200 yards receiving?


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  28. #28
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    Bell - 1200 yards receiving?
    Yep.

    When he was drafted, I said that he'd be Larry Centers who can also actually run. I see Bell vying for the "total yards from scrimmage" record. I see him as a "1000-1000" type of player: equally as effective catching as running.

  29. #29
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by teegre View Post
    Yep.

    When he was drafted, I said that he'd be Larry Centers who can also actually run. I see Bell vying for the "total yards from scrimmage" record. I see him as a "1000-1000" type of player: equally as effective catching as running.
    Watch Le'Veon Bell torch Lawrence Timmons for a long catch

    http://steelerswire.usatoday.com/201...-a-long-catch/

  30. #30
    Senior Member Array title="teegre has a reputation beyond repute"> teegre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Posts
    15,076

    Re: Wheaton: Steelers have potential for 3 1,000-yard receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by polamalubeast View Post
    Watch Le'Veon Bell torch Lawrence Timmons for a long catch

    http://steelerswire.usatoday.com/201...-a-long-catch/
    That person is smart.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •