If Kevin Colbert said anything like that, do you think he meant the Steelers purposely leave players they have evaluated as better, to choose a lesser player, with the intent of filling the practice squad? Complete and utter nonsense.
I sorta remember that as well. But wasn't it after like the Arizona SB victory or something? I kind of feel like it was in the context of a situation where 18 of 22 starting spots were locked down by above average or better players, there was some solid depth, etc. In that case, after the 4th round or so, you aren't getting a "starter" on a loaded championship team. You are drafting developmental projects etc.
For instance, if that was indeed the time that Colbert said the quote, then in that time period McCullers is on the practice squad and never sees a "hat" on gamedays. Is he still a good pick?
Now if Colbert said it like 2 years ago -- then yet another in a series of his weird grumpy old man notions.
The purposes of the practice squad are to develop players not quite ready for the NFL, to stash players the coach / GM believe may help the team at some point during the season as an injury or performance replacement, as a way to expand the bottom of the roster (some teams make practice squad transactions often), and to keep players that contribute on the scout team. Development of players is the primary reason practice squads exist, especially since the demise of NFL Europe.
I thought it was special teams players he was looking for in later rounds. Not exclusively, but in other words the later you're drafted the more it's going to help you make the squad if you can come right in and be an impactful player on special teams.
And regardless of what he said or what he might have meant, Kelvin Beachum, and Antonio Brown were both drafted after the 4th round by Colbert and have turned out pretty good. So relax everyone.
"A man's got to know his limitations."
SteelByDesign: Jarvis Jones: over/under 7.5 sacks in 2015?
Ray Fittipaldo: That's a good number. I'll guess under.
http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/s...s/201505180152
What did he get, 2 sacks in 3 games this year, before going out with a broken wrist? I think what we're going to find is that he will be best used as a situational pass rusher. I don't think he can hold the edge on the run effectively. Anyway if used right I could see something along the lines of 7.5-9.5 sacks. But I don't think he'll ever prove to be worth a first round pick. (hope I'm proven wrong) So if I had to bet ( and I don't, nor will I ) I would probably be looking at a push. I think he'll end up right at that number.
"A man's got to know his limitations."
under
denverdog: Curious as to how many TE they normally keep and your best guess who they will be this year
Ray Fittipaldo: They kept four last year if you count Will Johnson, who is more of an H-back now. It was Johnson, Heath Miller, Matt Spaeth and Michael Palmer. Palmer was not re-signed so I would imagine it would come down to Rob Blanchflower and rookie Jesse James for the last spot
Out of everything in the entire article, this just made my day.
See you Space Cowboy ...
Ike Taylor Has High Expectations For Jarvis Jones In 2015
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2015/05...jones-in-2015/
Tape doesn't lie. Jones has such a long way to go.
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2015/05...e-pass-rusher/
Here is an article on Jarvis Jones vs the run
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2015/05...s-run-defense/
Hater = Realist