Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 56

Thread: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="Shoes has a reputation beyond repute"> Shoes's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    11,737

    A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    This one examines what the Steelers have as receiving options at WR, TE, and RB, and what the Steelers want to have. The follow-up will consider the likeliest answers who will be available in the draft ... and particularly in Day 3 of the draft.

    http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com...2014-nfl-draft

  2. #2
    Member Array title="slashsteel is on a distinguished road"> slashsteel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Gender
    Posts
    46

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    I think you could see two receivers come from this draft as well as a change of pace back.

    Wheaton could really make this unit shine if he has a solid year........... As well as Blount helping out in short yardage and the red zone.............

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="GBMelBlount has a reputation beyond repute"> GBMelBlount's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Gender
    Posts
    8,756

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Agreed.

    The effectiveness of the receiving corp may largely hinge on Wheaton's development this year.
    "With love, with patience, and with Faith
    ....She'll make her way" ~ Natalie Merchant

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="MrPgh has a spectacular aura about">

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Gender
    Posts
    571

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    I think if the Steelers draft a WR in one of the first two rounds, then Wheaton could be moved into the slot. Too bad the Steelers didn't play him more. The worst he would have done was drop passes, which is exactly what Sanders did and he kept playing.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    i disgaree with the notion about the receivers. how do we expect to finally have success in the red zone when we have 3 midgets as our top 3 receivers (at the moment) and a so-so red zone tight end in heath miller? if we pick up any sort of receiver that isnt big, fine, but that will only help us move between the 20 yard lines. We already have the players for that, or at least we are counting on it
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,232

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Maybe Todd Haley is watching a ton of film of the '80's era Broncos and their smurf wide receivers?

  7. #7
    Dwinsgames
    Guest

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    Maybe Todd Haley is watching a ton of film of the '80's era Broncos and their smurf wide receivers?
    or Oilers with the " real blue smurfs"

  8. #8
    Ghost Poster Array title="ALLD has a reputation beyond repute"> ALLD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Treasure Coast
    Posts
    11,816

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    We need another big pass catching TE and an OL to give BB time to throw the ball. Also use the quick slant, dump off out of the backfield and safety valve to increase completion percentage. Mix it up. At least it is not as predictable as BA.
    All Defense!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,232

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    or Oilers with the " real blue smurfs"
    I knew I forgot one! Broncos were the "3 Amigos" not the smurfs.

    Wasn't Haywood Jeffries pretty tall?

  10. #10
    Dwinsgames
    Guest

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    I knew I forgot one! Broncos were the "3 Amigos" not the smurfs.

    Wasn't Haywood Jeffries pretty tall?

    he was the only one with any real height to him rest 5'8-5'10 ish if memory serves

  11. #11
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,174

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    or Oilers with the " real blue smurfs"
    Or the Foreskins with the original "Smurfs"

    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by tube517; 04-28-2014 at 10:33 PM.



  12. #12
    Senior Member Array title="Steelerette has much to be proud of"> Steelerette's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Gender
    Posts
    1,287

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    he was the only one with any real height to him rest 5'8-5'10 ish if memory serves
    Still that was practically a pro-bowl squad they had at WR down there in Houston. They converted Givens to TE, midget, didn't really block, but damned good too. So height isn't everything. Though of course, at least one would be nice.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelerette View Post
    Still that was practically a pro-bowl squad they had at WR down there in Houston. They converted Givens to TE, midget, didn't really block, but damned good too. So height isn't everything. Though of course, at least one would be nice.
    if you dont want to score in the red zone
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array title="Drazo85 has a reputation beyond repute"> Drazo85's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Serbia
    Gender
    Posts
    1,127

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Does anybody has any information about recovery of Danario Alexander? He tore his ACL in preseason last year. He is 6`5 and he would add a height to our receiving corps. Of course as long as he is healthy.


  15. #15
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Drazo85 View Post
    Does anybody has any information about recovery of Danario Alexander? He tore his ACL in preseason last year. He is 6`5 and he would add a height to our receiving corps. Of course as long as he is healthy.
    4 torn acl's. no thanks
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  16. #16
    Dwinsgames
    Guest

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    many might find this a bit shocking ....



  17. #17
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,232

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Drazo85 View Post
    Does anybody has any information about recovery of Danario Alexander? He tore his ACL in preseason last year. He is 6`5 and he would add a height to our receiving corps. Of course as long as he is healthy.
    I think Alexander's knees are currently the consistency and strength of cole-slaw.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/...ario-alexander

    But he did look dominant the only time he was ever healthy in his career. SHame.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    many might find this a bit shocking ....


    I'm looking at it and I don't see what I am supposed to be shocked by? But, then again, I am dense.

  18. #18
    Dwinsgames
    Guest

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    I'm looking at it and I don't see what I am supposed to be shocked by? But, then again, I am dense.
    the pure fact that of ALL the WR in the NFL that ran 30 or more post routes in 2013 Nate Washington was the 4th most successful in yards per pattern and that his name is even mentioned among the likes of Calvin Johnson

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    the pure fact that of ALL the WR in the NFL that ran 30 or more post routes in 2013 Nate Washington was the 4th most successful in yards per pattern and that his name is even mentioned among the likes of Calvin Johnson
    ehhh these are pretty obscure statistics, a lot of variables could play into it probably. Back on topic, to those who dont have a problem with having the 3 midget musketeers compose the top of our WR depth chart, remind when the last time was when we were actually good in the red zone? Or even in the upper 1/3rd in the league in scoring? Yeah, exactly. Lets not pretend we dont "need" a big tall receiver. After 2 mediocre seasons, we arent in a position to say that anymore.Im going to have to respectfully disagree that our top 3 can replicate what the broncos, oilers, and redskins did. Dear lord baby jesus, just give me ONE big fella. Just one
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Array title="Steelerette has much to be proud of"> Steelerette's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Gender
    Posts
    1,287

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Well, what do we have

    Brown 5'10"
    Wheaton 5'11"
    Moore 5'9"

    Those are the only three I'd guarantee at this point will be on the opening day roster.

    On the bubble -

    Heyward-Bey 6'2" - not a midget but he's not a possession receiver either, okay fine.
    Derek Moye - 6'5"
    Justin Brown 6'3"
    Jasper Collins 6'0"

    Either Moye or Brown making the team combined with Heath on the field will pretty much settle that "big redzone target" you're after IMO.

    It's also my opinion we're going to draft one WR... maybe two if either a crazy value falls to us *or* just a day-3 flier in general. So let's look at potential draft targets.

    Mike Evans 6'4" 1st
    Odell Beckham 5'11" 1st-2nd
    Kelvin Benjamin 6'5" 1st-2nd
    Donte Moncrief 6'2" 2nd
    Martavis Bryant 6'3" 2nd-3rd
    Jordan Matthews 6'3" 3rd
    Brandon Coleman 6'6" 3rd (TE conversion project?)
    Jared Abbrederis 6'1" 3rd-4th
    Devin Street 6'3" 4th-5th
    Jeff Janis 6'3" 6th-7th

    Hardly exhaustive of course but here's most of the tall ones, plus a couple extra who have had buzz around here. Now to me, if they pick Moncrief or someone shorter than him, the team isn't nearly worried about the "big receiver" thing as some of the fans are.

    Evans would be nice but I just don't think we can afford to miss out on Dennard if he's there. I'm not so sure I wouldn't rather grab Hageman or Mosley or Gilbert than him either.

    Benjamin scares me. He could be Keyshawn Johnson or he could be a fat Limas Sweed.

    I'd be pretty happy if we went Dennard-Tuitt and grabbed our WR in the 3rd or 4th. Or you never know - if the team is confident in Wheaton and not worried about having a big-guy, we may not even grab one until late.

    The draft could go anywhere but either way I don't think the WR corps is going to be one of the team's shortcomings this coming season.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,232

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Ward 86 View Post
    ehhh these are pretty obscure statistics, a lot of variables could play into it probably. Back on topic, to those who dont have a problem with having the 3 midget musketeers compose the top of our WR depth chart, remind when the last time was when we were actually good in the red zone? Or even in the upper 1/3rd in the league in scoring? Yeah, exactly. Lets not pretend we dont "need" a big tall receiver. After 2 mediocre seasons, we arent in a position to say that anymore.Im going to have to respectfully disagree that our top 3 can replicate what the broncos, oilers, and redskins did. Dear lord baby jesus, just give me ONE big fella. Just one
    In 2002 and 2003 (Burress two best statistical seasons with the Steelers) they scored on around 1/3 (35% and 27%)of their drives. In 2013 they scored on slightly better than 1/3 (35%) of their offensive drives.

    I am having trouble finding #'s over time for red zone efficiency. But I will say this, I am not certain that a tall WR has any impact on that # at all. I think that having a solid protection scheme that keeps pass-rushers off the QB and then can also open actual running lanes for the backs would help red zone efficiency. If I remember correctly, when the Steelers have been good in the red zone, it was never due to overwhelming skill position talent, but a solid wall up-front.

    It all starts there. A high talent OT would likely have more of an impact on red zone efficiency next season than a tall WR.

  22. #22
    Alt+F4=Amazing. Try it! Array title="Craic has a reputation beyond repute"> Craic's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Just short of crazy
    Gender
    Posts
    9,827

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    In 2002 and 2003 (Burress two best statistical seasons with the Steelers) they scored on around 1/3 (35% and 27%)of their drives. In 2013 they scored on slightly better than 1/3 (35%) of their offensive drives.

    I am having trouble finding #'s over time for red zone efficiency. But I will say this, I am not certain that a tall WR has any impact on that # at all. I think that having a solid protection scheme that keeps pass-rushers off the QB and then can also open actual running lanes for the backs would help red zone efficiency. If I remember correctly, when the Steelers have been good in the red zone, it was never due to overwhelming skill position talent, but a solid wall up-front.

    It all starts there. A high talent OT would likely have more of an impact on red zone efficiency next season than a tall WR.
    IMPOSSIBLE! When Jerome Bettis was here and Cowher was coach, they scored on 90 percent of their offensive drives!


  23. #23
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    I would say our problem was we do have a high-talent OL, but a low-talent OL coach. I'm hoping the addition of Munchak will fix that. And also make it unnecessary to take any more goddamn linemen so early in the draft. We already have enough #1 and #2 OL picks on our roster to last a lifetime.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  24. #24
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelerette View Post
    Well, what do we have

    Brown 5'10"
    Wheaton 5'11"
    Moore 5'9"

    Those are the only three I'd guarantee at this point will be on the opening day roster.

    On the bubble -

    Heyward-Bey 6'2" - not a midget but he's not a possession receiver either, okay fine.
    Derek Moye - 6'5"
    Justin Brown 6'3"
    Jasper Collins 6'0"

    Either Moye or Brown making the team combined with Heath on the field will pretty much settle that "big redzone target" you're after IMO.

    It's also my opinion we're going to draft one WR... maybe two if either a crazy value falls to us *or* just a day-3 flier in general. So let's look at potential draft targets.

    Mike Evans 6'4" 1st
    Odell Beckham 5'11" 1st-2nd
    Kelvin Benjamin 6'5" 1st-2nd
    Donte Moncrief 6'2" 2nd
    Martavis Bryant 6'3" 2nd-3rd
    Jordan Matthews 6'3" 3rd
    Brandon Coleman 6'6" 3rd (TE conversion project?)
    Jared Abbrederis 6'1" 3rd-4th
    Devin Street 6'3" 4th-5th
    Jeff Janis 6'3" 6th-7th

    Hardly exhaustive of course but here's most of the tall ones, plus a couple extra who have had buzz around here. Now to me, if they pick Moncrief or someone shorter than him, the team isn't nearly worried about the "big receiver" thing as some of the fans are.

    Evans would be nice but I just don't think we can afford to miss out on Dennard if he's there. I'm not so sure I wouldn't rather grab Hageman or Mosley or Gilbert than him either.

    Benjamin scares me. He could be Keyshawn Johnson or he could be a fat Limas Sweed.

    I'd be pretty happy if we went Dennard-Tuitt and grabbed our WR in the 3rd or 4th. Or you never know - if the team is confident in Wheaton and not worried about having a big-guy, we may not even grab one until late.

    The draft could go anywhere but either way I don't think the WR corps is going to be one of the team's shortcomings this coming season.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mojouw View Post
    In 2002 and 2003 (Burress two best statistical seasons with the Steelers) they scored on around 1/3 (35% and 27%)of their drives. In 2013 they scored on slightly better than 1/3 (35%) of their offensive drives.

    I am having trouble finding #'s over time for red zone efficiency. But I will say this, I am not certain that a tall WR has any impact on that # at all. I think that having a solid protection scheme that keeps pass-rushers off the QB and then can also open actual running lanes for the backs would help red zone efficiency. If I remember correctly, when the Steelers have been good in the red zone, it was never due to overwhelming skill position talent, but a solid wall up-front.

    It all starts there. A high talent OT would likely have more of an impact on red zone efficiency next season than a tall WR.
    i do not want scrubs that just happen to be on this team. And i most certainly am not looking for big scrub receivers that are lazy. If i just wanted a random big receiver then id be satisfied because we have derek moye/justin brown to loiter around and do absolutely nothing. Therefore, out of the before-mentioned receivers im only interested in:

    Mike Evans 6'4" 1st
    Donte Moncrief 6'2" 2nd
    Jordan Matthews 6'3" 3rd
    Jared Abbrederis 6'1" 3rd-4th
    Devin Street 6'3" 4th-5th
    Jeff Janis 6'3" 6th-7th

    im excluding beckham not just because he doesnt fit the profile, but because i think we can get far better value later. And im including abbrederis because i think he's tremendously savvy and maybe the most underrated receiver in the draft. Oh, and im also biased because im a badger .

    jordan matthews would be a dream. jordan matthews = jordy nelson

    and also, Plaxico was a lazy, body-catching, alligator arming big receiver. i dont want a big receiver at the cost of having that kind of crap on the team.
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  25. #25
    Senior Member Array title="Mojouw has a reputation beyond repute"> Mojouw's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    22,232

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    But Plaxico was tall and tall WR's fix everything! I agree that a dominat physical mismatch of a WR would be a great thing to have. Only caveat being that I do not think there is a player that the Steelers will be in a position to draft that will really turn things around as a rookie.

    As to the OL; this will be a an incredibly telling draft. If the take a OL in the first 3 rounds, then we will all have Munchak's answer on the talent the Steelers got for their high draft picks.
    If we are quiet on that front until round 4 or later, then I would take that to mean that Munchak thinks he can work with the top 6-8 guys.

  26. #26
    Dwinsgames
    Guest

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Steelerette View Post
    I'm not so sure I wouldn't rather grab Hageman or Mosley or Gilbert than him either.

    If we draft Hageman in the first I might just shoot myself

  27. #27
    Senior Member Array title="Shoes has a reputation beyond repute"> Shoes's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    11,737

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    If we draft Hageman in the first I might just shoot myself

  28. #28
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,174

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by Craic View Post
    IMPOSSIBLE! When Jerome Bettis was here and Cowher was coach, they scored on 90 percent of their offensive drives!



  29. #29
    Senior Member Array title="one side only is a jewel in the rough"> one side only's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Gender
    Posts
    542

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    A big tight end would do wonders for offensive production. How about Troy Niklas in the second?

  30. #30
    Senior Member Array title="Shoes has a reputation beyond repute"> Shoes's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    11,737

    Re: A look at the Steelers receiving corps

    Quote Originally Posted by one side only View Post
    A big tight end would do wonders for offensive production. How about Troy Niklas in the second?
    I don't think it will happen, but would be okay with it if it did. Ebron, Niklas, CJ …just so we get one of them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •