Of course now we all await the inevitable post by Steeldawg telling Steelgal how she's all wrong on the lesbian thing.
Array title="zulater has a reputation beyond repute">
Of course now we all await the inevitable post by Steeldawg telling Steelgal how she's all wrong on the lesbian thing.
"A man's got to know his limitations."
Array title="smokin3000gt has a reputation beyond repute">
Yup.Originally Posted by zulater
Of course now we all await the inevitable post by Steeldawg telling Steelgal how she's all wrong on the lesbian thing.
Steeltrollin to argue all of SG's real world experiences in 3... 2... 1...
PATRIOTS**
BUNGLES
Steelers - 18 Bengals - 16 #0in25 #anotherseasonBungled
-¤ HTG ¤-
he won't now just to prove you wrong ....Of course now we all await the inevitable post by Steeldawg telling Steelgal how she's all wrong on the lesbian thing.
then again maybe he will to prove me wrong ??? /thinking
Array title="zulater has a reputation beyond repute">
He's an officious prigg, so of course he'll answer and correct her. That's his nature, he can't or wont ever stop himself. I don't even think it's within his control anymore. I'm not sure if we should loathe him, laugh at him or just feel sorry for him.
If Charles Winchester from M*A*S*H* and Cliff Clavin from Cheers were to form a gay union and by some miracle conceive I would imagine the reuslting offspring would very much resemble this.
"A man's got to know his limitations."
Le sigh...
- - - Updated - - -
Getting back on track...
It's really no surprise that many lesbians make a conscious choice to go that way. Most women aren't that far away to begin with.
"You've heard people brag about 'being in the zone'. They don't know what the Hell being in the zone is about. I played in the NFL for 15 years and I was only in the zone that one time." - "Mean" Joe Greene on the 1974 playoff victory over Oakland
I actually had this conversation with my girlfriend, I was saying a lot of women have a natural attraction to each other but she resented the fact that I thought that about women but I think it was just because she thought I was trying to talk her into a threesome.
Array title="Seven has much to be proud of">
I'd be careful about making this generalization.
"If you are holding on to something that you no longer need to hold on to, I encourage you to let go." - Rashard Mendenhall
As you're no doubt aware, being careful with generalizations isn't one of my strong suits
Besides, it's true...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23563096
"You've heard people brag about 'being in the zone'. They don't know what the Hell being in the zone is about. I played in the NFL for 15 years and I was only in the zone that one time." - "Mean" Joe Greene on the 1974 playoff victory over Oakland
From a guy's point of view, I can't really say I blame them - to take a quote from Seinfeld, "I find them (men) repugnant and unappealing."
Why most of what she said I agree with the promiscuity disease is just as prevelant in straight relationships. The only thing I disagree with is the idea that churches will be forced to perform marriage ceremonies I don't think legally they can. Also in the example she used of her friend that's not uncommon many homosexuals don't come to terms with their sexuality until later in life but her attraction to women I don't think was a spontaneous occurrence.Of course now we all await the inevitable post by Steeldawg telling Steelgal how she's all wrong on the lesbian thing.
Well, I know the difference between somone who's been on a journey of self discovery and a whackadoodle
"i don't think legally they can".....so why not just grant civil unions and not take the chance ? I mean the govt doesn't have the best track record of not infringing when they said they wouldn't.
Stay classy, leftnutz
I don't think they are taking a chance, churches can refuse to marry who ever they want hell in Mississippi a church just refused to marry a black couple, there are many that refuse interracial, gay, and intereligous marriages and they are not subject to lawsuits.Well, I know the difference between somone who's been on a journey of self discovery and a whackadoodle
"i don't think legally they can".....so why not just grant civil unions and not take the chance ? I mean the govt doesn't have the best track record of not infringing when they said they wouldn't.
"The bottom line on all of this: Multiple fact-checking news outlets have found absolutely no merit to Schubert's claims. A Seattle Times national investigation "checked with human rights commissions in four of the six states where marriage is legal; the commissions said there was not an increase in discrimination findings or suits involving same sex marriage." A Maine Today Media "Truth Test" also called around and found that "[t]here were no gay-marriage related claims against religious organizations in any of the states."
As far as civil unions go that's fine as long as its civil unions for everyone, I don't think gays fought for the right to marry to settle for civil unions, they want to be recognized as being married just as heterosexuals, I don't see anything wrong with that or why their relationship should be discounted in any way under the law.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
