See you Space Cowboy ...
I can kinda understand that - things were getting a little out of hand before that rule. But it was the instigator penalty implemented by the NBA reject in 1992 and its inclusion of a misconduct penalty in 1997 that REALLY killed the NHL. That's why I always say Roger Goodell and Gary Bettman were separated at birth. In the name of "saving them," they have actually done the exact opposite and completely killed their leagues.
I'm sure there were quite a few more, those were just the ones I grabbed from a short search. I'm not saying it's the same thing however. The implication was that the NFL DIDN'T fine players in the past. Even just these three examples proves that point wrong. That's all I was saying here.
Funny thing. I argued that same point with a buddy of mine about 10 years ago.
And even funnier thing X-Term, is that referees agree with you. A buddy of mine used to ref, even did a couple Major Junior games. From what he says, pretty much up and down the ranks, refs dislike the instigator rule because it stopped hockey from being a self-officiated sport. Now, there's a whole lot more cheap crap that happens. I still call hockey "basketball on ice" now, but what Bettman has done to Hockey VASTLY outweighs what Goodell has done the football. Everything from changing the name of the leagues and conferences to trying to remove "clutching and grabbing," from officials actually blowing whistles in the third period of playoffs games for penalties that didn't take away scoring chances, to the instigator penalty - it has changed vastly more than football has.
If they keep on its going to turn into flag football.
The cowards never started and the weak died on the way~~~Kit Carson
For them. In the NHL, bench brawls were the final step in reacting against certain issues, such as running the goalie, or sending out your goons against a scoring line. Of course, the Flyers took that to an extreme in the seventies, and that element of it had to be drawn back into balance with the rest of the game. But overall, I'm still think benchbrawls serve a particular purpose in hockey. You hae a bench brawl in a game, and it's over. It limits carryover to other games.
Then again, the rest of my post (to X-term) already clarified my position, so I can't help but ask why this point blank question?