Im going to take Legursky over Essex as well. i cant even remember the last time Essex played center for us. Legursky has shown that he can fill the center spot competently, and he is definitely a better guard. 2009, Essex starting all year at right guard? Remember that?

Seriously fellas, dont get me started lol. Legursky's lack of length shows up when he plays guard, a position that doesnt require length as much as OT, so im sure Essex has the definite edge there, but 2/3 is still an advantage to me. If our O-line gets banged up to shreds again, and for some reason we need a tackle behind Starks, Adams, and Gilbert...I say Foster would suffice. Essex is just too damn soft no matter where he plays. We have plenty of guards either way, and i think 4 tackles/flex tackles is enough (starks, adams, gilbert, foster). Hell if we need more depth behind that because of injuries, Colon can always swing back out. He's been unappreciated out there at right tackle, more than satisfactory, with or without the false start penalties everyone jokes about.
As for Dwyer vs. Clay. Totally agree that neither are very dynamic, but Clay is clearly inferior to Dwyer in terms of agility, speed, and yards after contact. And of the two, only Dwyer can be crowned a one hit wonder if he fails here on out. Clay isnt even good enough to hold that title. A 10 yard TD run against the last ranked run defense in the league? not what i would call a memorable run. Maybe for Clay..