View Poll Results: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • We resign Wallace but lose money needed to help other areas on the roster

    15 50.00%
  • Let another team sign him and gain an extra draft pick in the 1st round?

    15 50.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

  1. #1
    Up The IRONS! GO STEELERS Array title="Iron Steeler has a reputation beyond repute"> Iron Steeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    2,111

    Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    A . Getting signed back to the Steelers and possibly losing
    money to spend on future stars? Or
    B. Have another team sign him and gain an extra first rounder?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array title="Pristas has a spectacular aura about"> Pristas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Winston Salem, NC
    Gender
    Posts
    426

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    I voted for option 2. He is not a Larry or a Calvin. We draft wonderfully in the early rounds. It frees up money for other talent. Good receivers are a dime a dozen this year. I guarantee you there are three more Antonio Browns hidden in the later rounds this year. Ben's arm makes great receivers look elite. Imagine if we really had an elite receiver... Unfortunately for us, Brandon Lloyd is now with Tom Shady... now that is a scary offense.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="steeldawg is a jewel in the rough">

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,533

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    I say resign him, hes a big play guy who can stretch the field. Let Ben continue to build on the chemistry he has with our young recieving corp, why mess that up by bringing in a rookie who has to learn everything from scratch.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pristas View Post
    I voted for option 2. He is not a Larry or a Calvin. We draft wonderfully in the early rounds. It frees up money for other talent. Good receivers are a dime a dozen this year. I guarantee you there are three more Antonio Browns hidden in the later rounds this year. Ben's arm makes great receivers look elite. Imagine if we really had an elite receiver... Unfortunately for us, Brandon Lloyd is now with Tom Shady... now that is a scary offense.
    Brandon Lloyd is not an elite receiver. He had one outstanding year and otherwise averages about 400 yards a season. He was the best they could do under the circumstances. IMO, this doesn't change a thing for the Patriots.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    resign him

  6. #6
    Steeler Nation Array title="O'Malley will become famous soon enough"> O'Malley's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Portland Or.
    Gender
    Posts
    1,162

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Should be an option 3...
    Sign him to a one year deal and make him earn a long term contract..

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    No, don't be the denver broncos. All they've done the past half decade is develop young, promising talent and either trade them away, cut them, or let them loose in free agency. Yeah i know it's only one guy, but this isnt alan faneca or joey porter were talking about. Those guys were great talents but were on the twilights of their careers. Wallace is a budding homegrown talent, we'll let him loose later if we need to.
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  8. #8
    Black & Gold Metal Array title="SteelGhost is on a distinguished road"> SteelGhost's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    1,241

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Resign him IMHO

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array title="Pristas has a spectacular aura about"> Pristas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Winston Salem, NC
    Gender
    Posts
    426

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
    Brandon Lloyd is not an elite receiver. He had one outstanding year and otherwise averages about 400 yards a season. He was the best they could do under the circumstances. IMO, this doesn't change a thing for the Patriots.
    I wasn't trying to say that Lloyd was elite, just that Tom Brady could make him look very good this year. Everyone is preparing for the double tight end threat from NE. Lloyd gives them an added dimension. He is on my fantasy radar in a big way. He was an awesome receiver when he and Orton hooked up, but things have drastically fallen off for him. Brady will make Lloyd amazing again. You heard it here.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array title="st33lersguy has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15,230

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Option 2 only as long as we package the picks to move up and into the top 15 and get an excellent prospect like DeCastro

  11. #11
    Living Legend Array title="Dino 6 Rings has a spectacular aura about"> Dino 6 Rings's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Arkansas, (formally New Jersey)
    Posts
    2,403

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    sign the guy to this year's tender, he plays hard for a big free agent contract next year...pay Antonio Brown either mid season or right after the season next year and then FRANCHISE TAG Wallace for the 2013 season.

    evil but that's the Business.
    SuperBowl Wins - How many does YOUR team have? Steelers 6, 49ers 5, Cowboys 5, Packers 4, Giants 4, Pats 4, Redskins 3, Raiders 3, Broncos 2, Dolphins 2, Colts 2, Ravens 2, Bears 1, Jets 1, Bucs 1, Rams 1, Chiefs 1, Saints 1, Hawks 1

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array title="GBMelBlount has a reputation beyond repute"> GBMelBlount's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Gender
    Posts
    8,756

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Sign him. No Brainer IMO
    "With love, with patience, and with Faith
    ....She'll make her way" ~ Natalie Merchant

  13. #13
    Original Member Array title="steelerdude15 has a brilliant future"> steelerdude15's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    11,535

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Get him back! I don't know about you all, but we finally have a deep threat who has speed and I don't want to lose that.

  14. #14
    Steelers fan, circa 1985 Array title="BigNastyDefense is a name known to all"> BigNastyDefense's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Clowns Town, Ohio
    Gender
    Posts
    2,653

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Let me preface this by saying I want to keep Mike Wallace long term. I want him to retire a Pittsburgh Steeler with a few Super Bowl rings on his fingers.

    However, if resigning him is going to hurt the team in the long run, I would rather someone sign him away now so we at least get another first round pick out of the deal. If he wants Fitzgerald money (which he won't get from anyone, he isn't on Fitz's level), then he won't be a Steeler beyond next season. As it looks, nobody is signing him away so we will have him on the one-year tender with exclusive negotiating rights through this season and the very beginning of free agency next year.

    But if the Steelers cannot come to an agreement with him, we'll end up with a third round comp pick for him instead. I'd prefer to lose him now and get a first.

    However, if they can come to an agreement that pays him well and doesn't handcuff the Steelers in the future, lets keep him in the Black & Gold.

    RIP Marianne "HTG" - You'll Always Be With Us
    Follow me on Twitter @Blue_Collar_Guy

  15. #15
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
    Brandon Lloyd is not an elite receiver. He had one outstanding year and otherwise averages about 400 yards a season. He was the best they could do under the circumstances. IMO, this doesn't change a thing for the Patriots.
    QFT!!


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  16. #16
    Black and Gold Lantern Array title="The Duke is just really nice"> The Duke's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Panama
    Gender
    Posts
    4,369

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    So long as it's a reasonable contract you have to resign him
    "We're a team. There's no offense. There's no defense. There's no special teams. We're one. We're a band of brothers." – Ben Roethlisberger

  17. #17
    Senior Member Array title="GBMelBlount has a reputation beyond repute"> GBMelBlount's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Gender
    Posts
    8,756

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
    So long as it's a reasonable contract you have to resign him
    Simple as that.
    "With love, with patience, and with Faith
    ....She'll make her way" ~ Natalie Merchant

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array title="Pristas has a spectacular aura about"> Pristas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Winston Salem, NC
    Gender
    Posts
    426

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    QFT!!
    I call BS. Ocho Cinco didn't change a thing for the Pats. Lloyd will.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array title="steeldawg is a jewel in the rough">

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,533

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    letting wallace get away doesnt make alot of sense, we have him young and hes developed like we had hoped, why would we get rid of him to start over?

  20. #20
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pristas View Post
    I call BS. Ocho Cinco didn't change a thing for the Pats. Lloyd will.
    He might, but it will because he's with McDaniels. He's far from elite...


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  21. #21
    Senior Member Array title="Godfather has a brilliant future">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast
    Posts
    3,393

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Keep him.

    We don't have a lot of depth at receiver. No Hines, Cotch might go elsewhere, and Sanders might not stay healthy all year.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Array title="Psycho Ward 86 has a reputation beyond repute"> Psycho Ward 86's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Gender
    Posts
    9,675

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    He might, but it will because he's with McDaniels. He's far from elite...



    oh yeah lol look at those far from elite plays at

    0:38, 0:41, 1:33, 2:12, 3:30, 3:53, 5:00, 5:17, 6:56, 8:03, 8:09, and 8:24

    byproducts of Mcdaniels "system" of course . wonder if anyone can really even say exactly what that means. i dont get it, this is THE guy we shouldve maybe wouldve gotten had Wallace slipped out of our fingertips and we didnt want to draft a top-notch WR. Brown and Lloyd together would have the most insane body control/hands combo of any wide receiver tandem in the league, tell me there's a better one. It has little to do with stats, with the broncos it seemed like every other catch was a jawdropping high difficulty catch. Im pretty sure someone else here remembered how much excitement there was revolving around the guy at San Fran early on when he was doing the same thing before off field problems and injuries caught up to him for the longest time. Still made those same golden catches with the Rams and Broncos last season even if the stats dont show it. There's very few games outside of steelers games that i download off of ten yard torrents, but some broncos and rams games are the exception just because of lloyd, this kid is still crazy good, well worth your dvr!
    Quote Originally Posted by XxKnightxX View Post
    We are not Buffalo, We are not Miami. We are the Steelers, we dont blow out teams, we cock tease for ratings and keep games close.

  23. #23
    Senior Member Array title="TMC has a spectacular aura about">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    365

    Re: Which Mike Wallace scenario would you prefer?

    If his contract demands are not utterly absurd (and I do not buy the reports), then I keep him. Wide receiver is traditionally one of the hardest positions to draft and develop. We got very lucky with Wallace and Brown, finding them later in the draft. But, we also drafted guys like Willie Reid, Limas Sweed, and plenty others that never did a thing.

    Sorry, I just do not see trading a guy you know can contribute for a lottery ticket that MAY give you what you already have, a player that can contribute. Wallace made the Pro Bowl. He is not a roster filler.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •