Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 66

Thread: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array title="zulater has a reputation beyond repute"> zulater's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Fair Hill Md.
    Posts
    15,903

    Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/76...-st-louis-rams


    In a pre-draft blockbuster trade, the St. Louis Rams have agreed in principle to send the second overall pick in this year's draft to the Washington Redskins for three first-round draft picks and a second-round pick, according to a source in Cleveland familiar with the terms of the deal.


    The trade, first reported by FoxSports.com, cannot be signed off on, turned in and processed until the new league year starts Tuesday at 4 p.m. EST, but it is expected to become official then.

    In the deal, the Rams will receive the Redskins' No. 6 overall pick, as well as the Redskins' first-round picks in 2013 and 2014. The Rams will also receive Washington's second-round pick this year in return for the second overall pick that the Redskins now will use on whichever quarterback the Indianapolis Colts do not draft No. 1 overall.

    The deal was agreed upon early Thursday afternoon, but the NFL Management Council prohibited any announcement, a league source told ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen. The Rams now have the sixth, 33rd and 39th overall picks in next month's draft/


    Three ones and a second!
    "A man's got to know his limitations."

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array title="st33lersguy has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15,230

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    St. Louis won big! St. Louis has a chance to be a playoff team by 2014. Bad trade for Washington. Griffin is walking into a bad situation. Talentless team, bad ownership, and with 2nd round and first round picks gone the next two years, they will not have much of a chance to build a decent supporting cast.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array title="zulater has a reputation beyond repute"> zulater's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Fair Hill Md.
    Posts
    15,903

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by st33lersguy View Post
    St. Louis won big! St. Louis has a chance to be a playoff team by 2014. Bad trade for Washington. Griffin is walking into a bad situation. Talentless team, bad ownership, and with 2nd round and first round picks gone the next two years, they will not have much of a chance to build a decent supporting cast.
    Dan Snyder just can't help himself, he wants to win the offseason every year, and destroys the team as a result. The funniest part is the Redskins still claim they're in the market for Manning. Can you imagine that? Why on earth would Manning go there after they traded away their next 3 1st round picks?
    "A man's got to know his limitations."

  4. #4
    Thread DeRailer Array title="tube517 has a reputation beyond repute"> tube517's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    21,185

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Future bounty hunters for the Rams



  5. #5
    Spaghetti Time Array title="Chidi29 has a reputation beyond repute"> Chidi29's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Gender
    Posts
    7,490

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by zulater View Post
    Dan Snyder just can't help himself, he wants to win the offseason every year, and destroys the team as a result. The funniest part is the Redskins still claim they're in the market for Manning. Can you imagine that? Why on earth would Manning go there after they traded away their next 3 1st round picks?
    In their defense, you can find other pieces to the puzzle in free agency (something the Redskins are no stranger to doing). Not going to find a franchise QB anywhere else.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Trading THREE first-rounders and a second-rounder to move up four spots in the draft, for a guy who looks as likely to bust as any QB in recent memory? Man, this has the potential to go down as the worst trade in NFL history, bar none.

    I mean, you trade two first-rounders to get an established starting QB. These guys gave up almost double that to take a flyer on an unproven rookie with a half-dozen red flags. Snyder just made the Raiders look like geniuses. Also, watch out for the Rams circa 2015, although it's too bad their QB is nothing special either.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  7. #7
    Black and Gold Lantern Array title="The Duke is just really nice"> The Duke's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Panama
    Gender
    Posts
    4,369

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Nice job Rams

    and as usual, the Redskins are morons. You have a team devoid of talent and trade your next two first round picks?
    "We're a team. There's no offense. There's no defense. There's no special teams. We're one. We're a band of brothers." – Ben Roethlisberger

  8. #8
    Steelers fan, circa 1985 Array title="BigNastyDefense is a name known to all"> BigNastyDefense's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Clowns Town, Ohio
    Gender
    Posts
    2,653

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Wow. Just wow.

    And they are going to have trouble stockpiling talent around him by giving up first round picks in 2013 and 2014. Yes, there's always free agency....but how often to stud wide receivers and running backs hit the free agent market? It's not very often. But hey....maybe Terrell Owens will be in the NFL this year because there isn't anyone for RGIII to throw to on that team.

    The best chance for the Rams to trade back and get Justin Blackmon was with the Browns. Now with RGIII gone...I don't see the Browns trading back because I don't think there's going to be a player available where a team feels the need to trade up to #4 overall. If the Browns decide they need a receiver, then I think they might take Blackmon because their receiving corps totally sucks...and it would screw the Rams at the same time.

    RIP Marianne "HTG" - You'll Always Be With Us
    Follow me on Twitter @Blue_Collar_Guy

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array title="XxKnightxX has a spectacular aura about"> XxKnightxX's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Leesburg , VA . Formerly From 'Joissy
    Gender
    Posts
    1,635

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    So how do you One Up the raiders, well there you have it. Did anyone in the FO have the balls to tell Bruce Allen and Dan Snyder that this is retarted? WOW


  10. #10
    Original Member Array title="steelerdude15 has a brilliant future"> steelerdude15's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    11,535

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    I'm sorry, but I think this was stupid on the Redskins part, but great on the Rams part. Who gives up that many first round picks for a single player? This reminds me of when the Saints traded all their picks to get Ricky Williams.

  11. #11
    Once, we were L Legends Array title="oneforthetoe has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Steelers Nation
    Posts
    3,956

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Wow Dan Snyder < Mike Brown,

    Dan Snyder < Matt Millen

    Just a terrible trade for the Skins. Taking a chance on an unproven commodity and giving up all of your first round picks until 2015. Even Mike Ditka is shaking his head. On the positive side, if the Commish finds out that Greg Williams did run a bounty system at Washington, at least they won't lose any first round draft picks over the next two years.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array title="7willBheaven is on a distinguished road"> 7willBheaven's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,340

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    While they really only gave up 2 first rounders (they just swapped 1sts this year)....and a 2nd....in this day and age with the rookie cap...trades like this wont be unusual for a big player at the top of the draft. Had there been a rookie cap say the last 10 years...I could almost guarantee you there'd be a number of trades like this. Last year the Saints and Falcons gave up 1st rounders in this yrs draft to move up (and get a RB and WR)...and those deals seemed to work out pretty good as they both got solid players. So you're only talking 1 first rounder more to move up and get a potential Franchise QB (yes theres a 2nd rounder this yr involved...but putting that aside..as theres just about always another extra pick in most deals)...when you look at it that way...its not THAT bad. Yes it is a lot...and if RG3 flops...then yes it will be terrible. Its hard to get franchise QBs in this day and age and when you have the chance to do so you do it...for their sake he better pan out and become what they think he can be.

  13. #13
    Engorged Member Array title="tihmtahm will become famous soon enough"> tihmtahm's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sun City, CA USA
    Gender
    Posts
    366

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    I agree that the Redskins made a foolish trade... However... Why is everybody so down on RG3? He did quite well at the combine and everybody that has sat down with him says he's a very smart and talented guy. It's not like he's Ryan Leaf. I'm going against the grain and saying that he's going to do pretty good in the NFL. Maybe not 3 1st round draft picks good, but I'm betting he'll do better than the naysayers are giving credit for.

    By the same token... Why do most people think Luck is the 2nd coming of Christ? He's got the bigger potential to be the more collossal bust if he doesn't pan out. Just a thought.
    No matter where you go, there you are.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array title="steelreserve has a reputation beyond repute"> steelreserve's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Old Mexico
    Gender
    Posts
    13,413

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by tihmtahm View Post
    I agree that the Redskins made a foolish trade... However... Why is everybody so down on RG3? He did quite well at the combine and everybody that has sat down with him says he's a very smart and talented guy. It's not like he's Ryan Leaf. I'm going against the grain and saying that he's going to do pretty good in the NFL. Maybe not 3 1st round draft picks good, but I'm betting he'll do better than the naysayers are giving credit for.

    By the same token... Why do most people think Luck is the 2nd coming of Christ? He's got the bigger potential to be the more collossal bust if he doesn't pan out. Just a thought.
    Funny thing, at this point in Ryan Leaf's career, everyone else thought he was just as talented as RGIII. You just don't know.

    After this point, Luck does NOT have the potential to be the more colossal bust. He has the potential to cost his team one (1) wasted first-round draft pick. Griffin will cost his team three first-round draft picks if he busts, plus a second-rounder. Not to mention - no one knew who the hell RGIII was until midway through this year. Luck has been basically the picture of consistency for two-plus seasons with the spotlight squarely on him.

    Seriously, Redskins, WTF? Why would you trade away three first-round picks for any rookie? How dumb will you feel if your franchise QB is right there for the taking with a top-five pick next year, which you'll probably have after this move? How dumb will you feel if he's available in two years? You don't even know who's even going to be GOOD in two years. Yet you just throw everything at this guy for ... well, just because. Good fuckin' job.
    See you Space Cowboy ...

  15. #15
    Swaggin' University Array title="ShutDown24 has a spectacular aura about"> ShutDown24's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Gender
    Posts
    1,009

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    DEAR LORD.

    I'm all for going after a franchise quarterback, they are priceless. But what a haul for St. Louis! I think the Redskins could have gotten the pick for less.

    What a win for Les Snead. Great to start to his tenure with the Rams.


  16. #16
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417
    To say its a bad trade or foolish trade is kinda ignorant. No one knows at this point whether it's good or bad. However, that's a lot to give up for an unproven commodity. A lot.

    I think according to the draft chart, Ditka gave up 4200 and some points. This trade is estimated to be well over 5000.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  17. #17
    The Virginia Hillbilly Array title="Galax Steeler is a splendid one to behold"> Galax Steeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Galax Va
    Gender
    Posts
    13,750

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    To say its a bad trade or foolish trade is kinda ignorant. No one knows at this point whether it's good or bad. However, that's a lot to give up for an unproven commodity. A lot.

    I think according to the draft chart, Ditka gave up 4200 and some points. This trade is estimated to be well over 5000.
    I agree, but I have to think that the Rams will come out on top with this trade.

  18. #18
    Swaggin' University Array title="ShutDown24 has a spectacular aura about"> ShutDown24's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Gender
    Posts
    1,009

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    To say its a bad trade or foolish trade is kinda ignorant. No one knows at this point whether it's good or bad. However, that's a lot to give up for an unproven commodity. A lot.
    It may very well work out. I think that Griffin is a great fit in DC. However, I can say right now that on March 10th it is a bad trade. Why would you pull the trigger now if you are Washington? St. Louis wanted out of the #2 spot bad. And I don't believe anyone else was going to give up three firsts and a second for it. The only known threat you had was Cleveland and if it came down to it you could have outbid them - probably with less than you just gave away. I'm not the biggest fan of gamesmanship. I think if there is a player you want you should just take him. But with so much time left before the draft I think it would have been smart to make St. Louis sweat a little.


  19. #19
    Senior Member Array title="polamalubeast has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    28,888

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Wow

  20. #20
    Senior Member Array title="zulater has a reputation beyond repute"> zulater's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Fair Hill Md.
    Posts
    15,903

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    I'm just glad the Browns wont be getting R.G.III. I think the kid's the real deal, but given what the Redskins gave up to get him he's going to really be put up against it as far as surrounding talent.
    "A man's got to know his limitations."

  21. #21
    Senior Member Array title="st33lersguy has a reputation beyond repute">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15,230

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by tihmtahm View Post
    I agree that the Redskins made a foolish trade... However... Why is everybody so down on RG3? He did quite well at the combine and everybody that has sat down with him says he's a very smart and talented guy. It's not like he's Ryan Leaf. I'm going against the grain and saying that he's going to do pretty good in the NFL. Maybe not 3 1st round draft picks good, but I'm betting he'll do better than the naysayers are giving credit for.
    It is not the player, it is the situation that Daniel Snyder has put him in, rookie quarterback, talentless team, with a 2nd round pick this year and 2 1st round picks the next two years gone, they don't have much of a chance to build a supporting cast around him. They can try and build a supporting cast through free agency, but Snyder will probably just whiff on a boat load of players signed to massive contracts. I think Cleveland was on to something when they didn't want to get rid of their 22nd pick. Maybe they just wanted to make sure their starting quarterback had something on offense to work with

  22. #22
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by Galax Steeler View Post
    I agree, but I have to think that the Rams will come out on top with this trade.
    Agree. If I'm the Rams, I do it. If I'm the Redskins, it's too much for my blood...


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  23. #23
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by st33lersguy View Post
    It is not the player, it is the situation that Daniel Snyder has put him in, rookie quarterback, talentless team, with a 2nd round pick this year and 2 1st round picks the next two years gone, they don't have much of a chance to build a supporting cast around him. They can try and build a supporting cast through free agency, but Snyder will probably just whiff on a boat load of players signed to massive contracts. I think Cleveland was on to something when they didn't want to get rid of their 22nd pick. Maybe they just wanted to make sure their starting quarterback had something on offense to work with
    You can make an educated guess that this is how Snyder will handle it, but Snyder hasn't been that bad as an owner the last couple seasons. He's faded into the background and let the football people run the team. Bruce Allen is a good GM...he can build around RGIII if he's allowed...


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  24. #24
    Ghost Poster Array title="ALLD has a reputation beyond repute"> ALLD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Treasure Coast
    Posts
    11,816

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Reminds me of the Hershel Walker trade where the Cowboys built their SB team of the 1990s from the drafts picks of the Vikings. This would only be a good deal if RGIII can pass the ball to himself down field. It will make some headlines and sell tickets, but when they need to fill in the gaps over the next few seasons it will be very difficult to go deep into the playoffs IF they even contend.

    Bad trade for the Skins, brilliant for the Rams.
    All Defense!

  25. #25
    1 at a time Array title="Count Steeler has a reputation beyond repute"> Count Steeler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Gender
    Posts
    18,009

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Rams have a much better chance now of being a playoff team before the Redskins.

    Can't blame the Redskins for trying to improve their team, but that was a very steep price to pay.

    St Louis better make these picks count.

  26. #26
    Senior Member Array title="Godfather has a brilliant future">

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Mississippi Gulf Coast
    Posts
    3,393

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    What is it with Snyder and giving up draft picks? The year they drafted Laron Landry, they didn't have another pick until the fifth round.

  27. #27
    Swaggin' University Array title="ShutDown24 has a spectacular aura about"> ShutDown24's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Gender
    Posts
    1,009

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfather View Post
    What is it with Snyder and giving up draft picks? The year they drafted Laron Landry, they didn't have another pick until the fifth round.
    I can buy it more in this case - with a quarterback. But generally, the Redskins are way too quick to trade away their future assets.


  28. #28
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    This was a great deal for the Rams. I'm impressed with the way that Les Snead was able to come in here and get this deal done at this time. They wanted to get the deal done at the start of free agency and they were able to do it. Now they'll have these picks available for trade and I wouldn't be surprised to see them make another trade this year. Another team might want to trade up to #6 to get Tannehill. They could also package their two 2nd round picks to move back up into the first round.

    I'm also happy that RG III won't be going to Cleveland. I think he's going to be a very good NFL QB and I don't want to play against him twice a year.

  29. #29
    NFL's Dirtiest Player Array title="86WARD has a reputation beyond repute"> 86WARD's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Gender
    Posts
    53,417

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Browns offered a similar package and the Rams said no...lol.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dwinsgames View Post
    you are a Kenny Pickett enabler
    Enthroned Into The Good Old Boys Club - 2024

  30. #30
    Attitude is everything Array title="SteelerFanInStl has a reputation beyond repute"> SteelerFanInStl's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Gender
    Posts
    14,364

    Re: Redskins trade for number 2 overall pick

    Quote Originally Posted by 86WARD View Post
    Browns offered a similar package and the Rams said no...lol.
    The word here in St Louis is that the Redskins were more aggressive in trying to get the deal done. I don't think that the Browns were willing to give up both first round picks this year and the Redskins were willing to add the 2nd round pick this year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •