That's way too much to give away.
Hater = Realist
Sounds like a Cleveland move
For those i love i will sacrifice.
Si ventus non est, remiga
Can't really say that is a Cleveland move as they've been pretty good as of late wheeling and dealing. I would love to see them do that though.
If they are smart, they pay the money for Matt Flynn. Have a seemless transition into a QB and a "new offense" and still have the 2 first round picks...much better than trading up to get RGIII.
This craziness really started heating up after the combine started and RGIII put up eye-popping numbers. And we all know that combine heroes don't always pan out...I see the Redskins as being more dazzled into stupidity by somewhat irrelevant measurables more then the Browns.
Fire Goodell
The Redskins have been trading draft picks for years going back to George Allen's over the hill gang of the 70s. This isn't a new thing since Snyder's been there. Nothing new if they do this now.
What I have to wonder is, if they get all three number 1 picks, how much do they want for the first round position they pick up this year? Gotta wonder if they'd be will to trade down again and stock up some more on picks.
Especially if the Browns get the pick. Would be so bad to jump ahead of Detroit to pick up a CB if the lineman we want are gone? (or LB, if that's where they are picking). It's only a two step jump so it should cost us what, a third or fourth round pick? I say if it plays out that person we are REALLY interested in lasts that far, make the jump and snag him, we're not giving up that much anyway.
Of course, if it's Washington or the like that take the trade bait, there's no way we can afford to trade up into the 6 spot, nor any reason to do so.
What if Cleveland traded their #1 to somebody and they got to change cities?
All Defense!
YES