Nope... what are they trying to hide?Quote:
Originally Posted by st33lersguy
Printable View
Nope... what are they trying to hide?Quote:
Originally Posted by st33lersguy
I think they're holding out hope that the Electoral College overturns the results on December 19th and gives it to the Hildebeest instead. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by salamander
Or perhaps the "Hillary won the popular vote!" narrative is no longer accurate(?)
I've read that the true count puts Trump ahead in the popular vote as well, but other than posts on Twitter and Facebook, I haven't seen anything official (go figure.)Quote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
It just keeps getting more and more comical by the day... :lol:
Play-doh and coloring books? These are supposed to be postgraduates? Seriously?Quote:
With puppies, Play-doh and coloring books, safe spaces and therapy sessions turn universities into a joke.
...Trump’s substantial victory, when most progressives expected a Hillary landslide, came as a shock to many. That shock seems to have been multiplied in academe, where few people seem to know any Trump supporters — or, at least, any Trump supporters who’ll admit to it.
The response to the shock has been to turn campuses into kindergarten. The University of Michigan Law School announced a ”post-election self-care” event with “food and play,” including “coloring sheets, play dough [sic], positive card-making, Legos and bubbles with your fellow law students.” (Embarrassed by the attention, UM Law scrubbed the announcement from its website, perhaps concerned that people would wonder if its graduates would require Legos and bubbles in the event of stressful litigation.)...
Read more: 'Tolerant' educators exile Trump voters from campus: Glenn Reynolds
Remember how liberals joked about "conservatives losing their shit" when Obama was elected and then re-elected? Yeah, OK... :rolleyes:
Nothing to see here. :ranger:
http://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2016/11...million-votes/Quote:
Report: Illegal Immigrants Cast More Than 3 Million Votes In Presidential Election
Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: “I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally”
PHOENIX A.Z. (AP) — For months now, rumors have circulated the Internet that individuals were being paid to protest at rallies held by presidential hopeful Donald Trump. Today a man from Trump’s rally in Fountain Hills, Arizona back in March has come forward to say that he was paid to protest the event.
“I was given $3,500 to protest Donald Trump’s rally in Fountain Hills,” said 37-year-old Paul Horner. “I answered a Craigslist ad about a group needing actors for a political event. I interviewed with them and got the part.”
Trump supporters have been claiming that protesters are being paid by the Bernie Sanders’ campaign, but Horner disagrees.
“As for who these people were affiliated with that interviewed me, my guess would be Hillary Clinton’s campaign,” Horner said. “The actual check I received after I was done with the job was from a group called ‘Women Are The Future’. After I was hired, they told me if anyone asked any questions about who I was with or communicated with me in any way, I should start talking about how great Bernie Sanders is.” Horner continued, “It was mostly women in their 60’s at the interview that I went to. Plus, all the people that I communicated with had an AOL email address. No one still has an AOL email address except people that would vote for Hillary Clinton.”
When asked about the other protesters at the rally, Horner said he saw most of them during the interview and training for the rally.
“Almost all of the people I was protesting with I had seen at my interview and training class. At the rally, talking with some of them, I learned they only paid Latinos $500, Muslims $600 and African Americans $750. I don’t think they were looking for any Asians. Women and children were paid half of what the men got and illegals received $300 across the board. I think I was paid more than the other protesters because I was white and had taken classes in street fighting and boxing a few years back”
Read more: http://abcnews.com.co/donald-trump-p...id-to-protest/
Pathetic, but not the least bit surprising...Quote:
Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: “I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally”
Also not the least bit true - Mr. Horner was interviewed by The Washington PostQuote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
Paul Horner, the 38-year-old impresario of a Facebook fake-news empire, has made his living off viral news hoaxes for several years. ...
You’ve been writing fake news for a while now — you’re kind of like the OG Facebook news hoaxer. Well, I’d call it hoaxing or fake news. You’d call it parody or satire. How is that scene different now than it was three or five years ago? Why did something like your story about Obama invalidating the election results (almost 250,000 Facebook shares, as of this writing) go so viral?
Honestly, people are definitely dumber. They just keep passing stuff around. Nobody fact-checks anything anymore — I mean, that’s how Trump got elected. He just said whatever he wanted, and people believed everything, and when the things he said turned out not to be true, people didn’t care because they’d already accepted it. It’s real scary. I’ve never seen anything like it.
You mentioned Trump, and you’ve probably heard the argument, or the concern, that fake news somehow helped him get elected. What do you make of that?
My sites were picked up by Trump supporters all the time. I think Trump is in the White House because of me. His followers don’t fact-check anything — they’ll post everything, believe anything. His campaign manager posted my story about a protester getting paid $3,500 as fact. Like, I made that up. I posted a fake ad on Craigslist.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/...ewandowski.png
Why? I mean — why would you even write that?
Just ’cause his supporters were under the belief that people were getting paid to protest at their rallies, and that’s just insane. I’ve gone to Trump protests — trust me, no one needs to get paid to protest Trump. I just wanted to make fun of that insane belief, but it took off. They actually believed it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...mepage%2Fstory
I missed the ".co" (for comedy, I presume) at the end of the abcnews.com link. :doh: :chuckle:Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
These online scams (e.g. - the email requests I get to "update" my credit card account) are very well done these daysQuote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
I had to check my Washington Post link through a separate search to make sure I was not posting a fake WaPo story discrediting the fake protesters paid story :chuckle:
The part where he started talking about the disparity in how differently different people were paid should have been the only clue needed this was a fake. How would he even know how it broke down.
Strike 2 on me - I didn't read it that far. :chuckle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Born2Steel
Chicago Needs Hillary!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOCcRnvMPEU
Why a non radical muslim woman supported Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG6rNcsVOaA
Yea.... Oh my goodness..... my ass!
Thanks for posting that. I think this woman shows why Trump won. A lot more people feel like her than the Left thought.
Let me guess, all those protestors were told by their father's they would be forced to move out if they didn't make some money by a certain date which is why they took the time to leave their parents basement and protestQuote:
Originally Posted by vader29
Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precinctsQuote:
Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.
The Detroit precincts are among those that couldn’t be counted during a statewide presidential recount that began last week and ended Friday following a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court.
Democrat Hillary Clinton overwhelmingly prevailed in Detroit and Wayne County. But Republican President-elect Donald Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes or 47.5 percent to 47.3 percent.
Yup, I sure do believe Hillary won the popular vote fair and square. :rolleyes:
The laughable irony of the whole thing is that the reason this recount was pushed for by Jill Stein in the first place was to try and nail Trump's campaign for cheating.
Might want to quit while you're behind, libs... :coffee:
That's cuteQuote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
It wasn't voter fraud but Russia did hack the election with the intent to benefit the GOP nominee according to any credible source (which of course excludes El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago and his posse).
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. are in agreement with a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion — and officials say that he never changed his position — suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.a4c8fc7a81a4
If Putin was accused of seeking to assist Hillary Clintion Trump supporters would be screaming about it.
Proof? Voting machines are not connected to the internet. How was the voting hackked?Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
I did not say the voting machines were hacked, which was why I said it was not voter fraud. Hacked the election by hacking the DNC email system and then releasing what was obtained in an attempt to influence the outcome of the campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by silver & black
The positions of [FBI Director] Comey and [Director of National Intelligence] Clapper were revealed in a message that CIA Director John Brennan sent to the agency’s workforce Friday.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with [FBI Director] James Comey and [Director of National Intelligence] Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” Brennan said, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
The CIA and the FBI declined to comment on Brennan’s message or on the classified intelligence assessment that CIA officials shared with members of the Senate Intelligence Committee earlier this month, setting off a political firestorm.
In the closed-door Senate briefing, CIA officials said it was now “quite clear” that electing Trump was one of Russia’s goals, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.
CIA and FBI officials do not think Russia had a “single purpose” by intervening during the presidential campaign, officials said. In addition to the goal of helping elect Trump, Putin aimed to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, intelligence officials have told lawmakers.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.9a194832b80b
The Perfect Weapon - How Russsian Cyber-Power Invaded the U.S.
While there’s no way to be certain of the ultimate impact of the hack, this much is clear: A low-cost, high-impact weapon that Russia had test-fired in elections from Ukraine to Europe was trained on the United States, with devastating effectiveness. For Russia, with an enfeebled economy and a nuclear arsenal it cannot use short of all-out war, cyberpower proved the perfect weapon: cheap, hard to see coming, hard to trace.
“There shouldn’t be any doubt in anybody’s mind,” Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency and commander of United States Cyber Command, said at a postelection conference. “This was not something that was done casually, this was not something that was done by chance, this was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily,” he said. “This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&m odule=RelatedCoverage®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=art icle
Watching the video it sounds like they have had problems before in Detroit but have made great strides towards improving how the voting is conducted...Quote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
Has anyone ever noticed that the demorats have never said any of the leaks were untrue and/or false. Me neither.
EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-insiders.html
https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...c0&oe=58F8F989
So what we have here is not an illegal hack by a foreign government but a public service announcement :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
Make Russia Great Again!
So their evil diabolical plot to "rig" the election was to tell americans the truth about their government?Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
Democrats are just throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks at this point.
http://liberallogic101.com/wp-conten...44735153_n.jpg
Hillary Clinton lost for a lot of reasons other than Putin's effort to subvert the election, mainly because she was a horrible, dishonest candidate (FWIW I wrote in John Kasich for President since who carried Georgia was not going to swing the election and I could afford to make an empty gesture)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
But hard to see how FBI Director Jim Comey can be accused of throwing shit against the wall to support the Democrats
Or these guys
Appearing on CNN Wednesday night Graham said, “I do believe the Russians hacked into the (Democratic National Committee). I do believe they hacked into (John) Podesta’s email account. . . . I do believe that all the information released publicly hurt Clinton and didn’t hurt Trump."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.c3cfa23dff8e
Responding to intelligence officials’ report that Russia tried to influence the U.S. presidential election in favor of President-elect Donald Trump, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Arizona) on Sunday said he doesn’t know what to make of Mr. Trump’s dismissal of the issue.
“I don’t know what to make of it because it’s clear the Russians interfered,” he told CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “Whether they intended to interfere to the degree that they were trying to elect a certain candidate, I think that’s a subject of investigation. But facts are stubborn things. They did hack into this campaign.”
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/john-mcc...king-response/
Unlike Senators McCain and Graham, good to know some folks apparently are fine with a hostile power seeking to intervene in a U.S. presidential election as long as it might f**k over someone they despise.
But at least Vlad Putin will know he has a big fan in the White House.
Look I know what your saying. It's not the first time and it's definitely not the last time. Maybe next time they can pass around top secret documents and e mail on a server thats a little more secure than gmail. :noidea: Which in itself is illegal.Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
It's eveybodys elses fault but their own.
But then we do the same thing.
Remember When Obama Interfered in Israel’s Election and Used Taxpayer Money to try and OUST Netanyahu.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ust-netanyahu/
Exactly. Not protecting emails was just another example of Hillary and her staff's incompetence. In football terms it would be like not protecting your signals from the Patriots. Mangini didn't play that **** and got Billy Boy the 500k fine and lost 1st rounder. Russia is the evil Patriots and America needs a Mangini.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
IF HRC had won the election how many leaks would have followed? HRC was antagonistic towards Russia in a very hawkish way while being incapable of keeping intel out of Russian hands apparently: recipe for disaster.
"We lost because we were incompetent! It's not fair!"
They're complaining about some conspiracy because the hackers were Russian?
Don't they know basically all hackers are Russian? Are they new?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...9efa4c323f.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
http://i64.tinypic.com/25au4oo.jpg
False. *If* the Russians hacked anything, it was the DNC server, not "the election". If that act affected the election, then it's the DNC's fault 1) for doing all that dirt in the first place and 2) failing to cover their tracks after the fact. If the DNC was as crooked as this info confirms, then they *deserved* to lose. Yeah... *somebody* rigged an election, but it wasn't the Russians, it was the DNC. And *somebody* colluded with the Russians, but it wasn't Trump, it was Hillary. A little 'Inconvenient Truth' for ya. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
The media narrative is "exposing the dirt to the voters is meddling", which is pure-d bullshit, unless you happen to believe that an uninformed electorate is a good thing.
Now that you know how dirty your party is, here's a little free advice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVT_o1LVHIY
Best,
-Slashy
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaDan
if you have nothing to hide , it shouldn't /wouldn't be an issue
the DNC rigged the Primary elections and screwed Bernie
if there was ever an investigation that screamed investigate this that was it .... but ....
hey lets make a fake set of documents and try and Frame trump , it wont matter who all knows its fake because well " they are in on it "
so we will have his name all over the news night after night for a year or more trying to smear him in the meantime costing American tax payers Millions and millions of $$ for NOTHING and in the end maybe we can impeach him over complete bullshit ....
but hey what do I know all I am doing is witness it all first hand