the funny part is you calling someone out for being self righteous! pot calling kettle lmao.Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
Printable View
the funny part is you calling someone out for being self righteous! pot calling kettle lmao.Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
You have to be able to laugh at that video. :sofunny: Come on. Put your political beliefs down and just look at the guy that ruined the USFL, had a reality TV show, failed business ventures, casinos, who thinks his own daughter is hot............and he thinks he knows more about everything than steeldelusion does? That is some grade A comedy right there.Quote:
Originally Posted by cubanstogie
Well you certainly hit all the keywords with that screed, but I have yet to see anything that resembles an independent thought from you in probably 18 months or more. Probably much longer than that if you count the way that "trust the experts, where are your qualifications" is also your go-to argument in football discussions too. You are just an imbecile who recites doctrine. I guess sometimes you will be right and sometimes you will be wrong that way, but at least it explains your dogged devotion to authority. What a hopeless case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
To be clear expertise and authority are different things. Since you are an expert on so many subjects, I assumed you would realize that.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
Again....got any verifiable facts or legal precedents to back up your assertion that the law was super clear the way you explained it? This all started because I think Section 230 discussions/debates are interesting and important. I also was legitimately curious to see what legal framework that had made you so certain that I was not finding on my own. But...you have chosen to respond by getting defensive, resorting to personal attacks, and generally being wholly unable to back-up your assertions about the interpretation and clarity of the law under consideration.
We have previously discussed portions of this...and once you stopped assuming you know what everyone else thinks...we were actually fairly close in agreement on the way things "should" work. I suspect that is actually the case again...but your inability to calmly discuss things leaves that unclear.
For instance, regardless of the current legal standing and precedents for Section 230, I think that, ideally, no online venue would have to worry about anything that stopped short of criminal. Most of the current online legal framework was all designed to stop porn...and that is most of the current internet. So it clearly doesn't work. And yes, if no one moderates content at all, a ton of false information, foreign propaganda, corporate doctrine, and other things a variety of us may wish were not on the internet will flood through. But that is going to happen no matter what. Rather than continually tweak regulatory structures, we should focus on providing people with the skills to navigate the flood of information and content on the internet on their own.
Well, you know what, you still never answered my question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
What's in it for you? What's the point of going to so much effort and gathering so much information to create a fairy tale that is designed just to piss you off? What does one get out of being a liberal?
While it is certainly interesting to see people who are both so defeatist and self-loathing at the same time as being smug and superior, that is one for the psychologists. As far as I can tell, it's not rewarding or fun at all, and there's nothing to be proud of, either on your own part or that of your politician heroes. What's in it for you? What's your purpose? For real. It is really a bit much for me to comprehend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZjC45ondj0&t=139s
Notice how towards the beginning and end she rants against a black women. Very clever for multiple reasons.
Sounds good to me. Oh, wait... YouTube cartoon!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by willy
lmfao, nice try. good looking white woman who is christian and believes in 2nd amendment. Of course miserable, jealous people on left will hate. Camala is a complete joke! but even if you can back up bashing her with facts you’re labeled racist or misogynistic. Only reason Sleepy joe picked her. affirmative action at its finest!Quote:
Originally Posted by willy
Oh look, more racism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHCpCvncixk
Haha, she's protecting president Trump from women of color.
You lefties are "triggered" easily...lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by willy
And if she was a liberal you'd be crying sexism at any criticism of her. Also anyone who voted for biden should probably not be calling everyone they disagree with a racistQuote:
Originally Posted by willy
Charlottesville removes conservative white supremacists statue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4JEETgLkPw
You left out racist. All liberal snowflakes see or talk about is race race race.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
But if you are suspected of breaking the law, the police should be able to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKQqgVlk0NQ
Ahh, no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSveu6B3x1M
So how about Saul Goodman wannabe Michael Avenatti, the man liberals praised as a hero for no other reason than for going after Trump is now going to jail :toofunny::toofunny::toofunny:
Liberals and being wrong. Name me a more iconic duo.
Of course as per usual, the lying mainstream media is not covering it
So how about the fact that "the moon's mean radius is 1,079.6 miles (1,737.5 kilometers). Double those figures to get its diameter: 2,159.2 miles (3,475 km), less than a third the width of Earth. The moon's equatorial circumference is 6,783.5 miles (10,917 km)?"Quote:
Originally Posted by st33lersguy
:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
Is Fox News covering that?
:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
https://youtu.be/HObSl1xeD3s
:toofunny::toofunny::toofunny:Quote:
Originally Posted by silver & black