68% of defensive snaps is the number I've repeatedly heard and read. Tops in the league.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiansteeler
I'll stand by my comment.
Printable View
68% of defensive snaps is the number I've repeatedly heard and read. Tops in the league.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiansteeler
I'll stand by my comment.
Got a link?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
Already provided in post #25 of this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiansteeler
Contradicts what Alex Kozora says but okay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
However, 2/3 is still not "all they play for coverages".
Nice try at salvaging it. Solid.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiansteeler
When you do something more than anyone else and then trade away the dude doing that job for you...gonna raise some questions.
I'm gonna guess a significant portion of those remaining snaps were not coverage situations since the only ran two high a bit less than 18%.
Like I said; I'll stand by my statement.
Of course you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
Admitting that you shouldn't have said "all they play for coverages" isn't something you're capable of.
But hey, nice try at salvaging it. Solid.
You didn't even read the article you posted as "proof".
There's some really good online resources for reading and taking notes for comprehension of data drive analysis.
You apparently didn't look at the chart I provided because it doesn't fit your narrative.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
And don't insult me, I'm much smarter than you can ever dream of being.
I dunno. I got big dreams.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiansteeler
Dream on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw