Printable View
I like the PG and subscribe. Fittipaldo is the best of their writers. Dulac isn't all bad, just the stuff he doubles down on. He doesn't claim sources, he just acts like he knows what the Steelers will and won't do. The reason I read him is because if I want to know what the Steelers are going to do, I just see what Dulac says they will never do. Bingo.
And unlike random bloggers, the PG guys have actual press credentials and access to the locker room and the players.
I don't mind him as a backup, as long as he doesn't forget what his role is.
- - - Updated - - -
who's his competition, mark madden, ian crappaport, and ed bullschitte? :chuckle:Quote:
Originally Posted by polamalubeast
i kinda like aditi kinkhabwala though mainly cause i got a thing for indian women lol
I used to read the PG but I didn’t want to pay for it. They didn’t do anything innovative or updated with their stories. Same old stuff the local beat has been turning out for decades.Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertSteel
I get that first line access is likely a really good thing but I can’t find a Steelers reporter with credentials that then does anything but churn out the same sports report by number cliched nonsense. Or at least I couldn’t several years ago before they all went behind paywalls.
While bloggers lack access, they are forced to innovate and try and do other stuff to fill the gaps. Some of it is awful but some of it is really interesting.
Where, for me, nothing Fottapaldo, Dulac, or Bouchette has ever written or said is interesting. Despite their access and experience. It is a shame they squander it.
Amen to that. She is a very attractive woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckHodges
I also actually think Aditi is pretty good. She doesn't break a whole lot on big news stories, that I can remember, but that could be a credit to her ethics. She has worked for actual legitimate newspapers like the Wall Street Journal. I'm not saying that Wall Street Journal and other papers don't have their issues - they do. However, I've heard her talk in the past about how strict the Wall Street Journal was about having two sources for every story. She seems like a nice lady who doesn't take cheap shots at other journalists, but I think that might have been a "subtle dig."
Also, since she technically covers the AFC North for CBS, even though she has worked(s) for the Browns, I think she still comes off as pretty unbiased.
Here you go DuckHodges:
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.7segQ5...pr=1.5&pid=1.7
She’s a butter face.