https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...f9&oe=5849008B
Printable View
I've listened to this a number of times and still find it unbelievable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV6q9LOubfc
Who says the American media isn't biased..........nothing to see here, people. :coffee:
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...b7&oe=5837B375
Biased meaning your adjust your reporting to changing facts rather than just report the same story even if the facts have changed?Quote:
Originally Posted by stillers4me
Claim: The Wall Street Journal ran a Donald Trump story with different headlines in different markets in order to sway voters.
WHAT'S TRUE: An image showing two editions of the same day's Wall Street Journal with opposing headlines about Donald Trump's immigration stance is real.
WHAT'S FALSE: The Wall Street Journal did not publish different headlines in different markets in order to sway voters away from Trump.
This image was passed around on the Internet accompanied by the claim that the Wall Street Journal had deliberately published one headline, "Trump Softens His Tone," in a pro-Trump market area in an attempt to sway readers away from the the GOP nominee, and the other headline, "Trump Talks Tough on Wall," in a non-Trump market area to bolster support for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.
However, these opposing headline editions were not distributed to different political or geographic markets, nor were they intended to influence voters.
This picture shows two editions of the Wall Street Journal published at different times of the day. The paper on the left came off the press early in the day, while the paper on the right was produced later in the day. Print newspapers sometimes undergo revisions throughout their daily runs and typically employ marks to distinguish the various editions — in this case the differing WSJ editions are distinguishable by the number of stars displayed in the masthead:
http://www.snopes.com/wordpress/wp-c...ers-marked.jpg
Colleen Schwartz, the Vice President of Communications at The Wall Street Journal, confirmed that these editions were printed at different times, not in different markets. The edition on the left was published after Trump met with Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto early in the day (and referenced the seemingly cooperative tone of their discussion), and the edition on the right was published after Trump delivered a speech on immigration later in the day (and referenced Trump's reasserting his stance that he would force Mexico to pay for the building of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border)
http://www.snopes.com/wsj-different-trump-headlines/
Mentally and physically unfit.
Quote:
Hillary Clinton has 'medical episode' at 9/11 ceremony
Hillary Clinton had a “medical episode” that required her to leave a 9/11 commemoration ceremony early on Sunday, a law enforcement source who witnessed the event told Fox News.
The Democratic presidential nominee appeared to faint on her way into her van and had to be helped by her security, the source said. She was “clearly having some type of medical episode.”
After more than an hour of radio silence, Clinton's campaign issued a statement saying the former Secretary of State "felt overheated."
"Secretary Clinton attended the September 11th Commemoration Ceremony for an hour and thirty minutes this morning to pay her respects and greet some of the families of the fallen," Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said. "During the ceremony, she felt overheated so departed to go to her daughter's apartment, and is feeling much better."
But a witness told Fox News that Clinton stumbled off the curb, her "knees buckled" and she lost a shoe as she was helped into a van during her "unexpected early departure."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...urce-says.html
Wow.. I read the headlines but the video is worse than I thought. She looks like Weekend at Bernie's.
Not looking good for the Killary campaign. Trump should easily be able to poke that bee hive during the debates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgjq4teDig0
Authorities are reporting that 2 scary clowns were spotted on the debate stage tonight
So Trump is pretty much nothing more than a scripted Dolt...lol. This country is in big trouble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB2zoidUeLU :lol: Too funny not to post.
Click on it
Yep, neither Trump or Clinton are qualified to be President of the United States.
The only thing good from this election has been the SNL skits...
This country is fucked
If all of these "allegations" about Trump came out a year ago, we probably wouldn't be in this mess.
If it were hildabeast or billy it'd get swept under the rug. Oh wait
Pull a skeleton from a science teacher's classroom and put it in the white house, you'll have a better president than Trump and Hillary
It's rather convenient that all this regarding Trump comes out mere weeks before the election.
Meanwhile, Hillary "can't seem to recall" anything about the emails.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-...ail-practices/
http://i63.tinypic.com/154hiy9.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by salamander
I dunno, seems to me being a randy pig towards women was deemed to be perfectly acceptable behavior when Slick Willy was running...Quote:
Originally Posted by salamander
The rules are different for the Democrats.Quote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
It doesn't matter because this election is hers anyways... =\
Yepp. They determined that a LONG time ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by smokin3000gt
They've been out there. For a long, long time. The Stern tapes have been sitting there forever. If the Republican Party would've been on their game, they would've dig them up themselves and had a experienced/reputable candidate running against Hillary. Instead they have The shit show that is Trump. Only person worse at this stage may be Billy Bush...lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by salamander
The republican part wouldn't had? Isn't it the people that determine who runs?Quote:
Originally Posted by 86WARD
Not in hiliarys case. The media selected her two years agoQuote:
Originally Posted by BnG_Hevn
True. But the people running against trump could have pulled them out of the woodwork and possibly prevent having a buffoon as a candidate.Quote:
Originally Posted by BnG_Hevn
This is HUJJJJ
FBI reopens the investigation
FBI reviewing new emails in Clinton probe
(CNN) FBI Director James Comey said Friday the bureau is reviewing new emails related to Hillary Clinton's time as secretary of state, according to a letter sent to eight congressional committee chairmen, a surprise development with 11 days until the election.
After recommending this year that the Department of Justice not press charges against the Secretary of State, Comey said in the letter that "recent developments" urged him to take another look.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politi...tee/index.html
Julian Assange: My Next Leak Will Ensure Hillary’s Arrest
It's all an act. Comey will say "Uh uh uh, again she did something wrong but I shouldn't charge her because uhhhh, uhhh uhhh, she shouldn't be charged", just like last timeQuote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
Something's fishy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yRJiP4f_EU
Pretty much. "Sure, she broke the law, but she didn't mean to and she's also promised while crossing her heart and hoping to die that it will never, ever happen again." :jerkit:Quote:
Originally Posted by st33lersguy
Also factor in her sycophants who will vote for her regardless of what she does and Trump being the trainwreck that he is and everything is still on track to have this guy back in the WH as "First Lady" come January...
http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/...dent-again.jpg
And at the end of the day, considering the alternative (Trump), this may STILL be the lesser of two evils.
What a fucking shitshow this election has turned out to be. I honestly see no choice but to sit it out and simply not vote, personally, at least at the national level.
Since the libs here in Colorado are trying to push an amendment to the state constitution which is really nothing more than another cash grab/tax increase, I will definitely be voting no on that, but I'm leaving the ballot blank as far as the presidential election is concerned. Sure, I could essentially piss my vote away on one of the other options who collectively probably won't garner so much as 1% of the vote, but why bother?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fansince'76
Which is why I will vote for Trump. Washington needs a MAJOR OVERHAUL and while Trump is surely not my ideal candidate, he just may be what is needed to get the ball rolling. There must absolutely be term limits put in place, people like Harry Reed, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, John McCain, Chuck Schumer , Lindsey Graham and a bunch of others have to go. Trump isn't a politician and that is a ray of hope in this massively corrupt political system.....media included.