Rush hour traffic? No no. Food line, Dallas Texas. Good job Donny Boy.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/asse...xlarge-169.jpg
Printable View
Rush hour traffic? No no. Food line, Dallas Texas. Good job Donny Boy.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/asse...xlarge-169.jpg
:rofl2::rofl2:Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
I picture him saying this to himself in front of a big mirror.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
And, rehearsing it until he gets it just right.
Clueless people don’t have plans. They imagine things will get better by just saying they will and convincing their devout followers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
And surely Trump deserves all the credit for the vaccine.
Not the brilliant scientists, researchers, immunologists, and virologists who dedicated themselves to finding a solution.
Those are the people that your cult leader trashed and you want to give him credit for the vaccine. Very weak.
The hold he has on his followers defies logic.
well not really .Quote:
Originally Posted by cubanstogie
more than 5,600 Chinese and foreign nationals flew to the U.S. in February 2020 alone. including nearly 40,000 in the two months after the February restrictions were put in place. Thousands of these travelers flew directly from Wuhan. At least 60% of the travelers arriving in the U.S. on direct flights from China in February were not American citizens, according to government data.
A more accurate way to describe Trump’s Jan. 31 proclamation is as a “restriction” on travel from mainland China — not as an outright ban. There were numerous exemptions in place that appeared to nullify the goal of preventing travel into the country to stop the spread of the virus. These exemptions included people traveling from the Special Autonomous Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, and U.S. citizens, residents, their spouses, and close relatives.
The Trump administration did impose a number of restrictions, but not a complete ban on travel from China and its administrative regions
Trump this, Trump that ... you know what liberals never bring up in their coronavirus blathering? That places with few restrictions, and approaches that mostly urge people to use common sense, are no worse off than the liberal areas where shithead governors have ignored the science and locked everything down because omg everybody panic.
The only failed COVID response is a lockdown.
You will never see Bad Orange Man get any credit at all for the speed of the vaccine in record breaking time from the Trump administration. But you can bet your ass that when it works and the virus is under control, Senile Joe will be the hero in all of this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mach1
Perfect description of the libtard left.Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoLambert
https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...31&oe=5FF34168
Yeah, and they should being such a scientific lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelcityboyz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gpRaGIexvI
The conservative movement is heading for a psychiatric hospital.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020...rus-trump.htmlQuote:
There Was a Second Pro-Trump Conspiracy Hearing Thursday We Didn’t Even Notice
Jonathan ChaitNov. 20, 2020
https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/2c7/...quare.w700.jpgPhoto: Andy Manis/AP/Shutterstock
Yesterday, a prominent Republican who has squandered his reputation for sobriety plunged headlong into nuttery by promoting a series of wild conspiracies promoted by Donald Trump.
Wait. Actually this happened twice yesterday. Not only did Rudy Giuliani direct a circus-like hearing to advance his theory that Zombie Hugo Chavez stole the 2020 election, but Senator Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, also held a hearing to promote the benefits of hydroxychloroquine as a cure for COVID-19.
Supreme Court rejects bid to overturn Pennsylvania result
And on Tuesday the Supreme Court dismissed the suit. The one-sentence ruling did not even cover the Republicans' allegations, reading simply: "The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied."
Last week US Attorney General William Barr said his justice department had found no proof of mass fraud in the 2020 election.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55243008
The Law firm of Lionel Hutz and Bucky Barnes better get that evidence of ballot fraud to court soon. December 14th is coming pretty fast.
That is 0/50 in the courts. Several cases were in front of GOP appointed judges as well. I guess that mountain of evidence just wasn't enough...Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
We're at war with Eastasia.Quote:
we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come.
https://blog.youtube/news-and-events...0-us-election/
We've always been at war with Eastasia.
No more cartoons for adults?! Where will you all get your information and talking points? You might have to research, read, and think for yourselves...that'll go well.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
Its been a few weeks now. Just checking in to see if this "Legal Crusader" backed up claims of 11% illegal ballots cast in AZ with some supporting evidence?? I thought he had the key to this whole conspiracy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojouw
If there isn't some Kraken released soon, that sleepy guy is gonna set his alarm clock, get inaugurated on Jan 20th and its going to be a long 8 years for some people.
Yeah...the pace of the Twitter evidence has kinda slowed to a trickle, huh? I was really excited about seeing a Kraken. Guess it was just fake news? Or maybe Powell needs a pardon for something or other?Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
I wonder if OAN, the Epoch Times, and Sinclair hold a totally separate inaugural ceremony?
Seems like there has been plenty of evidence. But, as seems to be the case with all of the Democrat-caused problems of 2020, the evidence is not refuted, is it simply ignored. Just like the other Democrat-caused problems, it is not a matter of whether the evidence is on their side, but whether anyone will do anything about the fact that it is not. Because let's face it, not a whole lot of people buy the story that probably the most hated political party in American history won an election in which they got maybe 30% of the legitimate vote.Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
Its too bad that with "plenty of evidence", that the GOP has nobody in the legal system that they can find who will examine that evidence. :sorry: Still seems kind of strange that President Trump has appointed 194 Federal judges including 3 Supreme Court justices, but none of them have found the need to examine all this evidence that is alleged to be available. I just cant figure out why. :noidea:Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
Trump has now appointed almost a quarter of all active federal judges in the United States.
As of July 7, there were 792 active judges serving across the three main tiers of the federal court system: the Supreme Court, 13 regional appeals courts and 91 district courts governed by Article III of the U.S. Constitution. In his first term, Trump has appointed 194 of those judges, or 24% of the total.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ederal-judges/
I would think the GOP or the big man himself would be able to get such a case with all that evidence to be viewed, since he appointed 24% of the federal courts. If something doesn't happen, its going to be a long 8 years of the Dems with a president.
See, that sums up how much you just don't know. Attempting to be smug with the 8 years instead of 4, but self-owning without even realizing it.Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
Because I've got news for you, if something doesn't happen, it's not going to be 8 years. It's going to be permanent one-party rule, and even the liberals aren't going to like what happens next. As I said, it's like being proud of punching yourself in the face, as long as everybody else gets punched in the face along with you.
So you joining the army of nationalists and going to take over the USA? Please let me know, so I can buy stock in tin foil. Its gonna go thru the roof with all the hats this Qanon army is gonna be making.:hatsoff:Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
They didn't invent the phrase "useful idiot" for nothing ...Quote:
Originally Posted by El-Gonzo Jackson
Hey, it is true. There was voter fraud in Pennsylvania, as a man registered his dead mother and his dead mother-in-law to vote in the 2020 election!!! Details below.
Officials have found a case of a dead person voting.
Bruce Bartman has been charged with unlawful voting and perjury over allegations that he pretended to be his dead mother to cast a ballot in the November election for President Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.
Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer announced the charges in a press release Monday. Bartman was arraigned Friday and released on $100,000 bail, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer. If convicted on all charges, the 70-year-old Bartman could spend up to 19 years in prison.
In Delaware County, a task force composed of prosecutors, detectives, and other investigators has looked into voter-fraud complaints made to the board of elections.
Out of the hundreds of tips it received, Bartman was the only one that was substantiated, First Assistant District Attorney Tanner Rouse told The Inquirer.
"In the hundreds of calls we received and the hundreds of visits we made, we only found one instance of malfeasance, and that was Mr. Bartman," Rouse said. "And he will be prosecuted."
Samuel Stretton, Bartman's lawyer, told The Inquirer his client took responsibility for his actions.
"In his political frustration, he chose to do something stupid," Stretton told The Inquirer. "And for that he is very sorry."
https://www.businessinsider.com/vote...-trump-2020-12
So Republicans are debunking these voter fraud "Claims" with "Facts" by a Republican president. Is the Kraken going to be released soon? What are they waiting for?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLYugNRVLiQ&feature=emb_logo
new recordings released.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCIDRLCROWE
You know what, I guess the Democrats are right after all. Other than the
Audio recordings
Video recordings
Democrats acting suspiciously as if guilty
Democrats vehemently opposing any investigations as if guilty
Democrats outright destroying evidence
Sworn testimony from thousands of witnesses
Data analysis
Statistical impossibilities
There is absolutely no evidence of election fraud!
It is unbelievable - preposterous! - to think that hundreds, if not thousands, of Democrats could be involved in some scheme to change an election result they don't want.
All of those hundreds, if not thousands, of witnesses are just making it all up because they are involved in some scheme to change an election result they don't want.
Well, I guess we'll see what happens tomorrow. If they've been holding on to anything, that will be the time. Will be wild!
Pretty good summation of the left's state of denial.
Bury your heads in the sand deeper, it'll just go away eventually.
But its not the left that is denying the claims. Its Republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve
- Georgia Governor- Republican
-Georgia Secretary of State- Republican
- Penn Senator Pat Toomey- Repubilcan
- AG Bill Barr- Repubilcan
- Supreme Court- majority Republican and 3 justices Trump appointed.
This isnt a matter of left and right. Its claims vs facts.
I told payroll this morning that ..."all I am looking for is $11,780 more on my check this week. I did the work and I know they counted wrong, so there is nothing with them saying they recalculated." I'm pretty sure its going to work out for me.
I just can't believe anyone could have everything this ass-backwards without it being on purpose. This has to be an act.Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve