-
Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
As soon as a player gets fined I always hear Randy Moss in my head saying "Straight cash homie."
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
How the hell do they come up with these figures. Out of a hat? Three hundred and NINE?????
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FrancoLambert
How the hell do they come up with these figures. Out of a hat? Three hundred and NINE?????
It started out normal, but the fines increase by a certain percentage every year. This is the 5th? year of the CBA? So it may have started out as 15,000 but now it is up to 24,309.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
I don't think Watt ever touched the QB for which he was flagged 15-yds.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
I miss the days when a penalty wasn't an automatic fine.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
i don't really care about a bunch of millionaires having to pay fines anymore
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SteelerFanInStl
I miss the days when a penalty wasn't an automatic fine.
Remember the days when an hard hit wasn't an automatic penalty?
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BurghBoy412
Remember the days when an hard hit wasn't an automatic penalty?
Oh, most definitely.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
There is a difference between hard hitting and dirty plays, but not in the NFL.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Not like the NFL to leave money on the table like that.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Probably saw that JJ raised 33 Million for the Hurricane relief and let it slide this time.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ALLD
There is a difference between hard hitting and dirty plays, but not in the NFL.
So true. Violent hits are penalized more often whether they are dirty or not.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FrancoLambert
So true. Violent hits are penalized more often whether they are dirty or not.
Which is a problem. The officiating is penalizing the result, not the play and thats a problem.
-
Re: Shazier ($24,309), Gay ($24,309) and Wilcox ($24,309) were fined for unnecessary roughness
Quote:
Originally Posted by
86WARD
Which is a problem. The officiating is penalizing the result, not the play and thats a problem.
Yep. They've been doing that for years.
