PDA

View Full Version : Harrison wrong about Roethlisberger



zulater
07-16-2011, 01:51 PM
After capping a stellar season with a subpar performance in Super Bowl XLV, it’s understandable if James Harrison and the rest of the Pittsburgh Steelers are less-than-happy about the way the 2010 season ended.

But after James Harrison’s comments to Men’s Journal, it’s tough to imagine the mood will be any lighter when Steelers training camp opens this summer. Speaking of teammate Ben Roethlisberger's play in Super Bowl XLV, Harrison said:

"Hey, at least throw a pick on their side of the field instead of asking the D to bail you out again. Or hand the ball off and stop trying to act like
Peyton Manning. You ain't that and you know it, man; you just get paid like he does."

It’s doubtful that the fact that Roethlisberger’s second interception of the game came on a play that started on the Packers 49-yard line, technically “their side of the field” will make Harrison reconsider his comments.
But Big Ben’s unparalleled ability to lead the Steelers out of their own territory in the regular season should.

In 2010, Roethlisberger not only didn’t ask the Steelers defense to bail him out frequently, he was arguably the best quarterback in the league at helping his team reverse field position when backed up against its own goal line.

Roethlisberger completed 147 of 204 passes for 2,094 yards with three TDs and three interceptions in his own territory last season. His 103.7 passer rating here is even more impressive when one considers the difficulty in throwing touchdowns on plays that originate at least 51 yards from the end zone.

Of the 33 quarterbacks who threw at least 100 passes in their own territory last regular season, none had a better passer rating on those attempts than Roethlisberger, and his 10 yards per attempt on these passes was also best in the NFL.

Just three of Roethlisberger’s 204 passes from his own end were intercepted last season, an interception percentage of 1.47 percent. Only three of the 33 QBs mentioned above had a lower interception of percentage in their own territory – Josh Freeman, Tom Brady and Alex Smith.read more.... http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/22526/harrison%e2%80%99s-wrong-about-roethlisberger

ALLD
07-16-2011, 03:03 PM
They still lost. Imperial Dynasties do not lose the Super Bowl. This might be a great team, but it is not a 70s Steelers or even an 80s 49ers.

GBMelBlount
07-16-2011, 04:29 PM
Imperial Dynasties do not lose the Super Bowl.

Knowing that by definition we are not an imperial dynasty, I may not ever be able to eat or sleep again...

zulater
07-16-2011, 07:33 PM
They still lost. Imperial Dynasties do not lose the Super Bowl. This might be a great team, but it is not a 70s Steelers or even an 80s 49ers.

Uh ok, yeah, but what exactly has that got to do with the subject matter of this thread? :huh:

SMR
07-16-2011, 10:31 PM
Uh ok, yeah, but what exactly has that got to do with the subject matter of this thread? :huh:


lol, ditto

El-Gonzo Jackson
07-18-2011, 10:18 AM
Turnovers cost games and that INT didnt help things in the SB. Now placing blame on one person for it is wrong. I dont think it was the time or place to go for a slow developing, long pass like that, but what is Harrison implying?.....that Ben should have thrown it away, audibled or just completed it?

LLT
07-18-2011, 11:00 AM
They still lost. Imperial Dynasties do not lose the Super Bowl. This might be a great team, but it is not a 70s Steelers or even an 80s 49ers.

I dont truly believe that. In all sports we have seen dynasties that were truly GREAT...but rarely perfect EVERY year.

The Cleveland Browns of the early 1950s are a classic example. They went to six consecutive title games and won three NFL championships.

86WARD
07-18-2011, 11:36 AM
Dynasty is a word of the past...