Mojouw
03-18-2018, 06:11 PM
Sitting in front of the computer again avoiding doing actual work...and I got to thinking.
What about a nickel and dime package that doesn't have either ILB on the field?
Tuitt - Hargrave - Heyward and then stand Dupree up and move him around as the 4th in the front wall.
Watt is joined by Davis at the LB level.
Burns-Sutton-Haden-Hilton-MYSTERY SAFETY
Then if you want to go Dime, take Dupree off the field and add Sensabaugh or Allen?
Call me crazy and I realize that takes Watt out of the pass rush more than anyone may like, but let's assume they can't/don't get a guy who can cover like Shazier could -- rather than bang your head on the wall trying to force someone into a role they are ill-suited for, just go another direction? The biggest drawback I could see is that there just isn't enough "beef" on the field in this type of alignment. But maybe you only pull this out on like 3rd and 5 or more?
What about a nickel and dime package that doesn't have either ILB on the field?
Tuitt - Hargrave - Heyward and then stand Dupree up and move him around as the 4th in the front wall.
Watt is joined by Davis at the LB level.
Burns-Sutton-Haden-Hilton-MYSTERY SAFETY
Then if you want to go Dime, take Dupree off the field and add Sensabaugh or Allen?
Call me crazy and I realize that takes Watt out of the pass rush more than anyone may like, but let's assume they can't/don't get a guy who can cover like Shazier could -- rather than bang your head on the wall trying to force someone into a role they are ill-suited for, just go another direction? The biggest drawback I could see is that there just isn't enough "beef" on the field in this type of alignment. But maybe you only pull this out on like 3rd and 5 or more?