PDA

View Full Version : Steelers Expected To Activate Sutton From Injured Reserve



polamalubeast
11-20-2017, 06:38 AM
Even with five healthy cornerbacks, and a sixth in Joe Haden who's hopeful of returning by the end of the regular season, the Steelers are expected to recall rookie cornerback Cameron Sutton from the injured reserve list early this week.
Sutton was the team's third-round draft pick out of Tennessee who missed most of training camp with a hamstring injury. He returned to play in the third preseason game and broke up a pass on his first play as a slot defender. On the next series, as an outside corner, Sutton tackled a running back for a 3-yard loss.
Sutton also played in the fourth preseason game. Overall in the preseason he played 27 defensive snaps and 7 special-teams snaps, and made 6 tackles with a quarterback hit and the pass defense.
Sutton made the 53-man roster out of camp, but, because he aggravated his injury in the fourth game, was put on IR the following day.
The Steelers are allowed two recalls from the IR list and Sutton would be the first, and probably only, such move they make this season.

read more

https://scout.com/nfl/steelers/Article/Steelers-Expected-To-Activate-Sutton-From-Injured-Reserve-110783801

BlackAndGold
11-20-2017, 07:33 AM
Doesn't mention Hunter, but Fort and McCullers as potential cuts..

Can see Big Dan getting cut. D-line depth is great, they still have Lavon Hooks on the practice squad.


I guess we'll hear about this sometime during the week.

DesertSteel
11-20-2017, 09:35 AM
Big Dan. What a colossal disappointment.

86WARD
11-20-2017, 09:47 AM
You can’t cut Hunter...Bryant is and will be a “?” for a long time.

Rotorhead
11-20-2017, 10:46 AM
With Alualu, Big Dan is no longer needed, I think he will be cut. I want Sutten to get some playing time under his belt so I am glad about this. It gives us a lot of options going into the playoffs and for the future. Now, if we could just lock down a replacement for Mitchell!

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-20-2017, 12:42 PM
With Alualu, Big Dan is no longer needed, I think he will be cut. I want Sutten to get some playing time under his belt so I am glad about this. It gives us a lot of options going into the playoffs and for the future. Now, if we could just lock down a replacement for Mitchell!

I think they will wait until the draft to do that, along with hopefully a TE.

Psycho Ward 86
11-20-2017, 03:27 PM
Gilbert is getting suspended for PED's so now we dont need to cut anyone

teegre
11-20-2017, 07:16 PM
I can’t wait to see Sutton in action.

Craic
11-20-2017, 10:43 PM
With Alualu, Big Dan is no longer needed, I think he will be cut. I want Sutten to get some playing time under his belt so I am glad about this. It gives us a lot of options going into the playoffs and for the future. Now, if we could just lock down a replacement for Mitchell!
Replacing Mitchell isn't even close to a priority on our lists of needs. We need to find a replacement for Ben (because he only has at most a couple-three more years). We need a TE. I'd argue we even need a dedicated NT and another ILB over a replacement for Mitchell. Is he a great safety? No, but at worst, he is average to above average.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-20-2017, 11:37 PM
Replacing Mitchell isn't even close to a priority on our lists of needs. We need to find a replacement for Ben (because he only has at most a couple-three more years). We need a TE. I'd argue we even need a dedicated NT and another ILB over a replacement for Mitchell. Is he a great safety? No, but at worst, he is average to above average.

Mike Mitchell counts $8.1 million against the salary cap this year and another $8.1 million next season. I agree with Rotorhead that I would like to see a replacement for Mitchell, because when you are paying $8 million a year for an average safety, there are other positions that you cannot financially address due to cap constraints. I honestly think Mitchell gets released in the offseason to save cap space.

cubanstogie
11-21-2017, 12:30 AM
Mike Mitchell counts $8.1 million against the salary cap this year and another $8.1 million next season. I agree with Rotorhead that I would like to see a replacement for Mitchell, because when you are paying $8 million a year for an average safety, there are other positions that you cannot financially address due to cap constraints. I honestly think Mitchell gets released in the offseason to save cap space.
8 mill is quite a bit for an "average safety", but after watching Golden last week Mitchell looked like Ronnie Lott or Steve Atwater.

tube517
11-21-2017, 01:43 AM
Mike Mitchell counts $8.1 million against the salary cap this year and another $8.1 million next season. I agree with Rotorhead that I would like to see a replacement for Mitchell, because when you are paying $8 million a year for an average safety, there are other positions that you cannot financially address due to cap constraints. I honestly think Mitchell gets released in the offseason to save cap space.

I agree. Plus, he will be 31 next year.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-21-2017, 09:32 AM
8 mill is quite a bit for an "average safety", but after watching Golden last week Mitchell looked like Ronnie Lott or Steve Atwater.

What did Robert Golden do last week that was so terrible? I didn't see its impact in the game, but I missed part of the 2nd quarter.

SteelMember
11-21-2017, 09:39 AM
What did Robert Golden do last week that was so terrible? I didn't see its impact in the game, but I missed part of the 2nd quarter.

Was Coty supposed to get any kind of help on that deep middle TD pass to Matthews? Looked like Golden pushed to double the boundary man really early... then made a really crappy tackle attempt. :noidea:

polamalubeast
11-21-2017, 09:58 AM
932992639808557057

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-21-2017, 10:48 AM
Was Coty supposed to get any kind of help on that deep middle TD pass to Matthews? Looked like Golden pushed to double the boundary man really early... then made a really crappy tackle attempt. :noidea:

On that play Davis was in the box, man on the TE and the Steelers must have been doubling Corey Davis, because Artie Burns instantly releases him inside and deep to play underneath trail technique, while Golden immediately took away the deep corner pattern, so that left Sensabaugh and others in man with no help over the top. It looks like a designed bracket of Corey Davis, so no Coty wasn't going to get deep help to the middle.

I think Golden played it the way they wanted, but could have got his head around quicker when the ball was out to get back in the play and have a better angle to make the tackle.

Rotorhead
11-21-2017, 11:23 AM
I agree that QB is going to be a need also, however I disagree with all the hate on Outlaw. He is not the best blocker, but he is reliable on making the catches that are thrown to him (ala Heath Miller at the end of his career, catch with not much yardage after). I can wait on a TE. ILB . . . well we seem to be doing quite well with Shazier and Williams this year so I can wait on that as well. Next draft we are going to pick low again, so if you think we can bundle our 1-2 picks for a shot at Ben's replacement (I don't) then we can address that, however it makes more sense to use our top 3 picks on a S, TE and ILB and pick a stop gap QB in FA. Maybe Ben stays for 1 more year after this to try for SB #4 for him and then I expect a low period, a roster shakeup and our next franchise QB to rebuild with.

Craic
11-21-2017, 12:02 PM
I agree that QB is going to be a need also, however I disagree with all the hate on Outlaw. He is not the best blocker, but he is reliable on making the catches that are thrown to him (ala Heath Miller at the end of his career, catch with not much yardage after). I can wait on a TE. ILB . . . well we seem to be doing quite well with Shazier and Williams this year so I can wait on that as well. Next draft we are going to pick low again, so if you think we can bundle our 1-2 picks for a shot at Ben's replacement (I don't) then we can address that, however it makes more sense to use our top 3 picks on a S, TE and ILB and pick a stop gap QB in FA. Maybe Ben stays for 1 more year after this to try for SB #4 for him and then I expect a low period, a roster shakeup and our next franchise QB to rebuild with.

James is serviceable. However, if we can pick up a TE with better blocking ability or a better YAC ability, the net increase n fixing one of the teams weak spots would be much greater than picking up a safety to replace Mitchell unless that player was special. As for Ben's replacement, I really wouldn't mind seeing us trade out of the first and, say, third round this year for a middle first next year. then, we can bundle that with our other first next year and trade up to get a QB. Then, use the second this year on a TE if he's around. As for ILB, yes, they're doing well. However, who's behind them? An injury there is going to seriously hurt. I think it's more important to backfill that position than get a safety.

- - - Updated - - -


Mike Mitchell counts $8.1 million against the salary cap this year and another $8.1 million next season. I agree with Rotorhead that I would like to see a replacement for Mitchell, because when you are paying $8 million a year for an average safety, there are other positions that you cannot financially address due to cap constraints. I honestly think Mitchell gets released in the offseason to save cap space.

Cap space is a different argument. There, you might be right. I was just arguing level of play.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-21-2017, 12:05 PM
I agree that QB is going to be a need also, however I disagree with all the hate on Outlaw. He is not the best blocker, but he is reliable on making the catches that are thrown to him (ala Heath Miller at the end of his career, catch with not much yardage after). I can wait on a TE. ILB . . . well we seem to be doing quite well with Shazier and Williams this year so I can wait on that as well. Next draft we are going to pick low again, so if you think we can bundle our 1-2 picks for a shot at Ben's replacement (I don't) then we can address that, however it makes more sense to use our top 3 picks on a S, TE and ILB and pick a stop gap QB in FA. Maybe Ben stays for 1 more year after this to try for SB #4 for him and then I expect a low period, a roster shakeup and our next franchise QB to rebuild with.

I'm not a James hater, but just realize that he is a complimentary TE in the NFL. A #2 guy on most rosters, a #3 talent on some other rosters and I think the Steelers front office and coaches are aware of that with them moves of going after Ladarius Green last year and Vance Mcdonald this season.

If Ben retires, the Steelers can shop for a QB in free agency with the money they will save from cutting Mitchell and McDonald, then structuring a long term deal with Bell and then look at drafting a Safety and TE with priorities in the first 2 rounds. If Ben stays another season, then they can still address the Safety or TE and QB positions in a combination of draft and FA, but the savings they find from moving on from Mitchell and McDonald will help.

Craic
11-21-2017, 01:55 PM
I'm not a James hater, but just realize that he is a complimentary TE in the NFL. A #2 guy on most rosters, a #3 talent on some other rosters and I think the Steelers front office and coaches are aware of that with them moves of going after Ladarius Green last year and Vance Mcdonald this season.

If Ben retires, the Steelers can shop for a QB in free agency with the money they will save from cutting Mitchell and McDonald, then structuring a long term deal with Bell and then look at drafting a Safety and TE with priorities in the first 2 rounds. If Ben stays another season, then they can still address the Safety or TE and QB positions in a combination of draft and FA, but the savings they find from moving on from Mitchell and McDonald will help.

I'd prefer they restructure Mitchell's contract instead. What I don't want to see happen is this team finally getting on track defensively and being able to stop the pass, only to then lose a starting safety and end up not picking up another one, or having that one not work out in our system. As for Ben coming back, if we win the SB this year, I think he retires much like Manning and Bettis. If we get close, I think he comes back for one more shot.

As for salary for a new QB, I don't think we have to make such drastic changes. Ben's salary cap hit alone is 23 million next year. If we lose him, we eat only 12.4 mill in dead money, leaving 11 million open next year alone to sign a QB. It also clears up the 23 mill cap hit the following year (with no dead money for Ben since it was accelerated). If you brought someone like Cousins in, that first year's salary can be buoyed by a signing bonus spread out over the next few years. Dumping McDonald clears up another 5 mill or so without any dead money (depending on who replaces him) and Harrison leaving clears another 1.5 or so million. That gives us 17 mill to offer the first year under the cap with signing bonuses extended it out a few years. I should not, however, that several players will eat up more of the cap next year, but I'm thinking the cap increase will alleviate most of that pressure. The big question will be Bell's salary. However, that cap hit can be managed as well, which may even give us more money under the cap right now.

tube517
11-21-2017, 02:07 PM
Mitchell will be 31 next year. He is annoying with his celebrations after routine plays but more important, he plays through alot of injuries. My concern is these injuries are starting to pile up at his age and add that w/the cap hit, I wouldn't be surprised if he is gone. I'm not saying we should cut him but looking at the overall picture, I understand it.

Born2Steel
11-21-2017, 02:09 PM
I'm ok with replacing Mitchell if it's with a veteran safety. I do not want another rookie back there.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-21-2017, 02:38 PM
Mitchell will be 31 next year. He is annoying with his celebrations after routine plays but more important, he plays through alot of injuries. My concern is these injuries are starting to pile up at his age and add that w/the cap hit, I wouldn't be surprised if he is gone. I'm not saying we should cut him but looking at the overall picture, I understand it.

I agree. Getting old, costing too much and injuries piling up. The thing I find interesting is how fans went from enjoying the greatness that was Troy Polamalu, to embracing the mediocrity that is Mike Mitchell.

I would rather they moved on and either pick up another free agent, or draft a rookie, or both. Still, if he has 1 more season at $8million and they draft his replacement this spring, that works too. They did a good thing in getting Sean Davis, now I would like to see the other safety spot upgraded next season.

Psycho Ward 86
11-21-2017, 03:58 PM
It would be really nice to replace Mitchell with an immediate, experienced veteran but the free-safety capable market doesnt look too promising this offseason overall.


If we do go for somebody, how about Eric Reid? Still young, decent bill of health, a pro bowl player not too long ago but probably kind of forgotten because he was drafted by the 49ers just as they started to go on their speedy descent into mediocrity.

Designated strong safety, but was drafted as a free safety. He got converted to linebacker this season by the 49ers to keep the best 11 players on the field. High football IQ guy. Davis and Reid together would look wonderful in tandem as they can both play anywhere.

DesertSteel
11-21-2017, 07:38 PM
What the heck is up with Wilcox??? I thought he just had football bumps and bruises but he's on a milk carton now.

SteelerFanInStl
11-21-2017, 07:42 PM
What the heck is up with Wilcox??? I thought he just had football bumps and bruises but he's on a milk carton now.

Yea, I'd like to know also. I thought that he came right in and played pretty well and then he disappeared.

FrancoLambert
11-21-2017, 08:09 PM
Big Dan. What a colossal disappointment.

How he continues to stick around amazes me. The guy does nothing for us.

Craic
11-21-2017, 08:33 PM
Mitchell will be 31 next year. He is annoying with his celebrations after routine plays but more important, he plays through alot of injuries. My concern is these injuries are starting to pile up at his age and add that w/the cap hit, I wouldn't be surprised if he is gone. I'm not saying we should cut him but looking at the overall picture, I understand it.

Again, those are considerations I'm okay with. What I was responding to was the idea that Mitchell is a liability on this team. He's much better than people give him credit for.


I agree. Getting old, costing too much and injuries piling up. The thing I find interesting is how fans went from enjoying the greatness that was Troy Polamalu, to embracing the mediocrity that is Mike Mitchell.

Only if Mitchell was mediocre, which he isn't. No, he's not lighting up the position, but on the balance sheet, he's been a solid safety for us. Moreover, there's a little reality here that many don't seem to embrace. Troy P. was a once-in-a-generation player. Odds are we're not going to get another one like him for quite a while. Moreover, we are now starting five first round draft picks on defense and brought in a sixth, and are also starting 2 second round picks. At the level they're playing at, we have to pay them (especially as we're also trying to pay a RB and WR who are both perhaps the best in the NFL at their position, as well as a Center and Guard who might rank the same. It's not like the days when we had a first rounder in Troy, Casey, and everyone else were low-round picks. And, yes, that's exactly what they were. Keisel was a seventh round pick, Kimo von Oelhoffen was a 6th round pick, Aaron Smith a 4th round pick. Ike Taylor was a 4th round pick as was Larry Foote. Clark Haggans was a fifth round pick. And Ryan Clark and James Harrison were undrafted as was Harrison. Sure, we picked up another first and second round LB in Timmons and Woodley, but we did so when we had a horrible Oline that deserved little money, fielded an undrafted RB and only had two receivers of note (and that, only for three years).

Why does all that matter? Because the reality is we're only paying Mitchell 5 mill this year, which puts him 28th in earned salaries for safeties. The other 3 mill in the cap hit is bonuses that we're on the hook for no matter what. So, keeping in mind we'd be paying that 3 mill whether we released him or not, do you really think we could get a better safety than Mitchell to come in and play for the 28th highest cash salary at that position?

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-21-2017, 11:52 PM
Why does all that matter? Because the reality is we're only paying Mitchell 5 mill this year, which puts him 28th in earned salaries for safeties. The other 3 mill in the cap hit is bonuses that we're on the hook for no matter what. So, keeping in mind we'd be paying that 3 mill whether we released him or not, do you really think we could get a better safety than Mitchell to come in and play for the 28th highest cash salary at that position?

What is the cap savings if Mitchell is released prior to the 2018 season? I believe its significant.

Mitchell is tied for 26th highest paid safety. Do you think there are other NFL safeties that are making less who are better? Below are a few that make less than the $5million salary Mitchell makes this year.

-DJ Swearinger
-Reggie Nelson
-Antoine Bethea
-TJ Ward
-Malik Hooker
-Karl Joseph
-Patrick Chung
-Keanu Neal
-Kenny Vacarro
-Eric Reid
-HaHa Clinton Dix
-Jimmy Ward
-Landon Collins
-Jaquiski Tartt
-Vonn Bell
-Tre Boston

I think there is are a lot of other NFL safeties that are better than Mitchell and make less money. I looked it up and the Steelers can save $6.4 million in cap space by releasing the 31 year old Mitchell next season. IMO, its a reasonable possibility.

Craic
11-22-2017, 12:36 AM
I looked it up and the Steelers can save $6.4 million in cap space by releasing the 31 year old Mitchell next season. IMO, its a reasonable possibility.

That depends on what else happens at that position. If the BPA falling to the 32nd position is a FS and he comes on strong in OTAs, then I see that possibility being entertained. I do not see us actively seeking a FS veteran, however. The other option is a restructured contract, which I think is a more likely option. Maybe even extending him a year or two to soften the cap hit.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 12:57 AM
That depends on what else happens at that position. If the BPA falling to the 32nd position is a FS and he comes on strong in OTAs, then I see that possibility being entertained. I do not see us actively seeking a FS veteran, however. The other option is a restructured contract, which I think is a more likely option. Maybe even extending him a year or two to soften the cap hit.

I think a restructure should be in order. I don't think Mitchell would garner much on the open market, given his age and lack of production and that can be asserted in the negotiations.

Remember when Mitchell was signed? The questions were....are the Steelers getting the player who didn't live up to expectations of the 2nd round draft pick in Oakland, or were they getting the ball hawking player with range that hat 4 INT's in one season in Carolina? He has had 4 INT in 4 seasons with the Steelers and I think we know what player the Steelers got.

Mitchell is on the downside of his career and it looked like it peaked that one season in Carolina. I think the Steelers should put cap space on players with upside, rather than aging veterans who have run out of potential.

DesertSteel
11-22-2017, 09:58 AM
What is the cap savings if Mitchell is released prior to the 2018 season? I believe its significant.

Mitchell is tied for 26th highest paid safety. Do you think there are other NFL safeties that are making less who are better? Below are a few that make less than the $5million salary Mitchell makes this year.

-DJ Swearinger
-Reggie Nelson
-Antoine Bethea
-TJ Ward
-Malik Hooker
-Karl Joseph
-Patrick Chung
-Keanu Neal
-Kenny Vacarro
-Eric Reid
-HaHa Clinton Dix
-Jimmy Ward
-Landon Collins
-Jaquiski Tartt
-Vonn Bell
-Tre Boston

I think there is are a lot of other NFL safeties that are better than Mitchell and make less money. I looked it up and the Steelers can save $6.4 million in cap space by releasing the 31 year old Mitchell next season. IMO, its a reasonable possibility.
Looks like a lot of rookie contracts and a couple over-30's.

Mojouw
11-22-2017, 10:24 AM
What is the cap savings if Mitchell is released prior to the 2018 season? I believe its significant.

Mitchell is tied for 26th highest paid safety. Do you think there are other NFL safeties that are making less who are better? Below are a few that make less than the $5million salary Mitchell makes this year.

-DJ Swearinger
-Reggie Nelson
-Antoine Bethea
-TJ Ward
-Malik Hooker
-Karl Joseph
-Patrick Chung
-Keanu Neal
-Kenny Vacarro
-Eric Reid
-HaHa Clinton Dix
-Jimmy Ward
-Landon Collins
-Jaquiski Tartt
-Vonn Bell
-Tre Boston

I think there is are a lot of other NFL safeties that are better than Mitchell and make less money. I looked it up and the Steelers can save $6.4 million in cap space by releasing the 31 year old Mitchell next season. IMO, its a reasonable possibility.

Like DesertSteel said, roookies and couple of over 30 guys. Not really a useful list. This list is a bit more instructive - free agent 2018 free safeties (http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/free-safety/)



Reggie Nelson (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/4171/)
FS
34
OAK
TBD
10
55




$4,250,000
UFA
-


Nate Allen (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/6546/)
FS
29
MIA
TBD
7
20




$3,400,000
UFA
-


Calvin Pryor (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14427/)
FS
25
JAC
TBD
1





$2,140,813
UFA
-


Bradley McDougald (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/12835/)
FS
27
SEA
TBD
10
22




$1,800,000
UFA
-


Michael Thomas (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/10443/)
FS
28
MIA
TBD
10
16




$1,797,000
UFA
-


Corey Graham (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/1278/)
FS
32
PHI
TBD
8
18



1
$1,600,000
UFA
-


Cody Davis (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/12975/)
FS
28
LA
TBD
6
16

1

1
$1,458,333
UFA
-


Nate Ebner (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/10018/)
FS
27
NE
TBD
8
2




$1,200,000
UFA
-


Deshawn Shead (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/10429/)
FS
29
SEA
TBD






$1,200,000
UFA
-


Eddie Pleasant (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/10571/)
FS
28
HOU
TBD
10
22
2
2
1
1
$1,075,000
UFA
-


Keith Tandy (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/9995/)
FS
28
TB
TBD
8
8




$925,000
UFA
-


Tre Boston (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14539/)
FS
25
LAC
TBD
10
52



4
$900,000
UFA
Market Value (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14539/market-value/false/)


Jairus Byrd (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/5496/)
FS
31
CAR
TBD
6
4




$900,000
UFA
-


Rafael Bush (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/7039/)
FS
30
NO
TBD
9
11
1
1


$855,000
UFA
-


Terrence Brooks (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14489/)
FS
26
NYJ
TBD
9
7

3

2
$717,844
UFA
-


Adrian Phillips (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/15335/)
FS
25
LAC
TBD
10
39

1
1
1
$690,000
UFA
-


Walt Aikens (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14536/)
FS
26
MIA
TBD
10
1




$658,977
UFA
-


Nat Berhe (http://www.spotrac.com/redirect/player/14563/)
FS
26
NYG
TBD
10
6
1
2


$603,200
UFA
-



The name that jumps out to me is Tre Boston. The site lists his market value (their tool for estimating FA contracts) at $7.6 million so I mean if we are really concerned about over-paying for average+ safety play - there is a great opportunity. This guy was already in for a FA visit in May after he got cut in Carolina. Having a decent "bet on yourself" year with the Chargers.

If the Steelers really want to improve the FS position, I figure they have 3 options:
1. Draft a guy that bumps Golden off the roster and let the kid develop behind Mitchell for a year.
2. Shift the big dude out of Utah or wherever that was drafted last year to FS and sit him behind Mitchell for a year.
3. Pay one of these guys (http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/strong-safety/) a ton of money - like 7-12 million per - and shift Davis to FS. I could be into Burnett or the Kenny Vaccaro redemption tour. But that is a lot of money and a lot of moving pieces in what is an only recently "good" secondary. Either way - no $$ savings and no guarantee that it results in better play.

The way I see it, the above scenarios essentially ensure that Mitchell is back for another year. Likely, as I believe another poster mentioned, 1-3 years on a restructured deal. If Steelers fans want to see increased production from the safety spot, the best hope is that Sean Davis takes a leap and really starts impacting games on a week in week out basis.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 10:36 AM
Looks like a lot of rookie contracts and a couple over-30's.

Yup, and Sean Davis is in that range as well. Could one make a case that at least 80% of that list are better than Mike Mitchell and we would happily pay them the $5million that Mitchell is making to replace him?

So draft a Safety to replace Mitchell or look for some other vets similar to Patrick Chung, Reggie Nelson, DJ Swearinger to pay $5million to. I personally prefer drafting one. The fans with their #23 jerseys will still want to extend Mitchell and say his stats don't tell the whole story. I honestly don't think that over the past 4 seasons Mitchell has been here, that I have said on Mondays ..."Mike Mitchell really came up big on Sunday" any more than 5 times in 4 seasons. I think that list shows the Steelers can do better at the position for lower salary.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 10:45 AM
Like DesertSteel said, roookies and couple of over 30 guys. Not really a useful list. .

Thanks, but the statement was made that Mike Mitchell is the 28th highest paid safety at $5million a season and the question was if we could really get somebody better at the position without paying better than that $5million salary. I posted that list of players to show that there is a lot of better talent at the Safety position, for even less salary and reply that yes we can upgrade safety without breaking the bank.

The only problem is that you cant upgrade the safety position, if you keep old and declining talent on the roster. IMO, the Steelers need to draft a safety next year, to plan for the departure of Mitchell and to improve the position. Again, when is the last time and how often have you really said that Mike Mitchell has lived up to the level of play of Ryan Clark or even Chris Hope? I just think the FS position has been mediocre here for the past few seasons and look forward to it changing in the future.

Mojouw
11-22-2017, 11:49 AM
Thanks, but the statement was made that Mike Mitchell is the 28th highest paid safety at $5million a season and the question was if we could really get somebody better at the position without paying better than that $5million salary. I posted that list of players to show that there is a lot of better talent at the Safety position, for even less salary and reply that yes we can upgrade safety without breaking the bank.

The only problem is that you cant upgrade the safety position, if you keep old and declining talent on the roster. IMO, the Steelers need to draft a safety next year, to plan for the departure of Mitchell and to improve the position. Again, when is the last time and how often have you really said that Mike Mitchell has lived up to the level of play of Ryan Clark or even Chris Hope? I just think the FS position has been mediocre here for the past few seasons and look forward to it changing in the future.

I agree that Mitchell could be upgraded - but that $5 million number is not a realistic one for what an upgrade would cost on the open market. Getting under that only applies if you talk about drafting a safety or taking a flier on a guy with question marks on his second or third contract. Almost every name on that list is either on an artificially depressed rookie contract or is a guy that took a "below market" deal because no one thought they were any good. So essentially rookies and Mitchell 2.0. In that scenario, I'm going with the devil I know.

Looking more specifically at the draft and using this list (http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?position=S&type=position) an "impact" FS is going to cost you a top 20 pick in the first round on average. So that really isn't happening. So now we are talking about a second-tier prospect that needs some developmental time. Landon Collins was not good his rookie year, etc.

Almost every scenario brings the Steelers back to starting Mike Mitchell unless they want to spend significantly more than $5 million per year and hope that Tre Boston is suddenly good for real or Morgan Burnett wants to leave Green Bay.

Bottom line: If the Steelers want to upgrade on Mitchell for $5 million or less, they need to draft a safety in the 1st round, hit on that prospect, and most likely wait 1+ seasons for that player to really impact. FS is hard to play and play well. There is no "secret" vet FA signing that is going to come here for $5 million or less and be assuredly better than Mitchell. The only chance is that if another Haden or Weddle situation arises and someone is unexpectedly cut and the Steelers can convince them to take less than market rate to ring chase.

DesertSteel
11-22-2017, 11:51 AM
Yup, and Sean Davis is in that range as well. Could one make a case that at least 80% of that list are better than Mike Mitchell and we would happily pay them the $5million that Mitchell is making to replace him?

So draft a Safety to replace Mitchell or look for some other vets similar to Patrick Chung, Reggie Nelson, DJ Swearinger to pay $5million to. I personally prefer drafting one. The fans with their #23 jerseys will still want to extend Mitchell and say his stats don't tell the whole story. I honestly don't think that over the past 4 seasons Mitchell has been here, that I have said on Mondays ..."Mike Mitchell really came up big on Sunday" any more than 5 times in 4 seasons. I think that list shows the Steelers can do better at the position for lower salary.
A second or third rounder should be able to plug right in. Bye bye Mitchell!!

Mojouw
11-22-2017, 11:55 AM
A second or third rounder should be able to plug right in. Bye bye Mitchell!!

Not based on history across the league.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?position=S&type=position

Hard to find many Day 1 rookie year starters outside of the first round on that list. Not impossible, but very very difficult especially at FS and not SS.

I want to be clear, I am all for upgrading the safety position overall and consider it a top priority alongside TE in the next off-season cycle, but I do not think there is a quick fix on the horizon. It will be a 1-2 year process.

Born2Steel
11-22-2017, 11:56 AM
Put the money in the front 7. Keep drafting guys like Sutton that can play zone AND man. FS will be the easiest position to play on the defense. Get a veteran that knows tendencies.

DesertSteel
11-22-2017, 11:59 AM
Not based on history across the league.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?position=S&type=position

Hard to find many Day 1 rookie year starters outside of the first round on that list. Not impossible, but very very difficult especially at FS and not SS.

I want to be clear, I am all for upgrading the safety position overall and consider it a top priority alongside TE in the next off-season cycle, but I do not think there is a quick fix on the horizon. It will be a 1-2 year process.
There's some good players on that list. Some busts too. But that's true of every position.

Shoes
11-22-2017, 12:17 PM
How he continues to stick around amazes me. The guy does nothing for us.

The Steelers always have a few parasites hanging around.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 12:20 PM
A second or third rounder should be able to plug right in. Bye bye Mitchell!!

Yes, I think that should be the plan. There is a stat out there that something like only 4% of rookies or less are day 1 starters, so I don't expect a quick plug and play guy, but something needs to be done going forward at that position.

Born2Steel
11-22-2017, 12:20 PM
I strongly disagree that Mitchell "does nothing for us". C'mon, just the fact that every fan would rather have him than Golden proves he has value to this team.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 12:26 PM
I strongly disagree that Mitchell "does nothing for us". C'mon, just the fact that every fan would rather have him than Golden proves he has value to this team.

Does nothing for us is a bit harsh. But, the situation you are describing is like preferring boiled spinach over brussell sprouts. I'm not saying that either are useless, but I am willing to search for a better alternative than both.

You do realize that Rob Golden was an UDFA from Arizona st that was a converted CB to Safety and has been nothing more than a special team ace in his career. Its kind of like saying that fans preferred Carlos Emmons at OLB over Patrick Bailey, so he must be good. (even though they likely didn't overlap chronologically)

Born2Steel
11-22-2017, 12:36 PM
Does nothing for us is a bit harsh. But, the situation you are describing is like preferring boiled spinach over brussell sprouts. I'm not saying that either are useless, but I am willing to search for a better alternative than both.

You do realize that Rob Golden was an UDFA from Arizona st that was a converted CB to Safety and has been nothing more than a special team ace in his career. Its kind of like saying that fans preferred Carlos Emmons at OLB over Patrick Bailey, so he must be good. (even though they likely didn't overlap chronologically)

Mitchell has played the safety position for the Steelers. Your examples mean NOTHING to the conversation. Taste vs physical ability to play safety in the NFL? Whatever Golden was, he's playing the safety role now. My point is there is no doubt who we would rather have between who we have on the roster currently, Mitchell or Golden. Only Golden's mother prefers him over Mitchell. That said, Mitchell has value to this team, this year. Can he be upgraded? Of course, but to say he does nothing for this team is the exaggeration I was disagreeing with. ONLY.

SteelerFanInStl
11-22-2017, 12:46 PM
I'd still like to know what's happened to J.J. Wilcox. I thought that he was playing pretty well when given the chance early in the season. Now he's not even getting on the field.

Born2Steel
11-22-2017, 12:56 PM
I'd still like to know what's happened to J.J. Wilcox. I thought that he was playing pretty well when given the chance early in the season. Now he's not even getting on the field.

Not sure. His stats show he's played in 8 games this season. Maybe he's not used in most of the subsets.

El-Gonzo Jackson
11-22-2017, 01:03 PM
Mitchell has played the safety position for the Steelers. Your examples mean NOTHING to the conversation. Taste vs physical ability to play safety in the NFL? Whatever Golden was, he's playing the safety role now. My point is there is no doubt who we would rather have between who we have on the roster currently, Mitchell or Golden. Only Golden's mother prefers him over Mitchell. That said, Mitchell has value to this team, this year. Can he be upgraded? Of course, but to say he does nothing for this team is the exaggeration I was disagreeing with. ONLY.

One could surmise that your statement that "every FAN prefers Mitchell over Golden proves he has value to the team" is an example that means nothing to the conversation.... Could it not? What does "fan opinion" of a player do that directly correlates to value? If that were true, John Kuhn would be making $20 million a year. :)

I never said he does nothing for the team and don't agree with that statement, whoever said it. Fan opinion of a player is as irrelevant as personal taste to a players value in the NFL. As I said before, Mike Mitchell's career in the NFL is that of a 2nd round pick that never lived up to expecations and his career peaked his 1 season in Carolina. He will be 31 next year and is on the decline in play, so it makes sense to plan for his future and I hope that is addressed this offseason.

SteelMember
11-22-2017, 01:15 PM
I'd still like to know what's happened to J.J. Wilcox. I thought that he was playing pretty well when given the chance early in the season. Now he's not even getting on the field.

Article (https://247sports.com/nfl/pittsburgh-steelers/Bolt/Robert-Golden-has-replaced-JJ-Wilcox-as-No-3-safety-for-Pittsbur-109763616) is about a month old, but somewhat of an answer without the specifics you may be looking for...

"J.J. Wilcox has been a huge disappointment for the Pittsburgh Steelers since arriving via trade at the end of the preseason. Expected to be a stabilizing force for their secondary, the pass-defense has actually been great... no thanks to Wilcox. His playing time has been reduced each week, and now, it seems, we have a change on the depth chart.

Chris Adamski of The Tribune-Review reports that Robert Golden, not Wilcox, seems to be the No. 3 safety on the depth chart at the moment.

That shouldn't come as any sort of surprise to those who have been watching the games. Golden played 33 defensive snaps against the Lions on Sunday. That's a lot even for a No. 3 safety, proving that the Steelers are gaining more and more faith in him as potentially big part of their defense even with Mike Mitchell and Sean Davis entrenched as the starters. Moving forward, it seems as though those three safeties will be the rotation.

Wilcox, on the other hand, played only one defensive snap on Sunday. He has played nine snaps in the past four weeks after playing a ridiculous 69 against the Baltimore Ravens the week before that stretch started. The Steelers have seen what Wilcox has to offer and have chosen to go in a different direction.

The Steelers have such a dominant pass-defense this year that shuffling parts around the back end likely won't have a major impact, but Mitchell and Davis could both easily get injured. If Golden has outplayed Wilcox so far, he deserves to be the Steeler to step up should a new starter be necessary.

Wilcox was an aggressive move to try to upgrade the defense right now. It was the right attitude for the Steelers, who hit a home run in that regard with the signing of Joe Haden, but ultimately Wilcox just didn't live up to expectations. He'll likely be a backup and special teams player for the rest of the year."

SteelMember
11-22-2017, 01:25 PM
Mike Tomlin not ruling out using Cam Sutton as punt returner
Sutton averaged 14.3 yards per return during his time at Tennessee.

Same site (https://247sports.com/nfl/pittsburgh-steelers/Bolt/Pittsburgh-Steelers-Mike-Tomlin-not-ruling-out-using-Cam-Sutton-as-punt-returner-110897329) as above

Craic
11-22-2017, 02:22 PM
Let's go at this discussion from another direction. What personnel moves, in order, do you think we need to make this offseason in order to be more competitive in the next two to three years while keeping the salary cap in mind?

Starting in 2018, the Steelers will be have $-11,936,687 of cap space. My guess is J. J. Wilcox will be dropped (article in another post in this thread). That is $3,125,000. Shazier has a base salary (and cap hit) of 8.7 million next year, which is the final year of his contract (up from a cap hit of 3.025 mill this year). However, his production puts him in line for an average salary of 11-12 mill a year (in the range of Vontaze Burfict to Luke Kuechly, or in between the eight and twelveth highest average salaries). So no cap room there unless we sign him to a six or seven year deal and spread out a smaller signing bonus along with roster bonuses along the way. This list doesn't even account for Le'Veon Bell and his cap hit. So, we're going to be in serious cap trouble next year without a lot of restructuring that.

Now, that being said . . .

Mike Mitchell is a 8.1 mill hit against the cap with 1.76 mill as dead money if he is released. Vance McDonald is 4.6 mill against the cap with 0 dead money if he is released. So, what of personnel moves? Dropping Mitchell gives us back 6.34 mill in cap money and dropping McDonald gives us 1.74 million less. Is Mitchell's contribution worth more than 1.74 mill compared to McDonald's contribution to the team? Absolutely. So, McDonald gets cut (in my scenario). Now, with the TEs we have left, is there a bigger deficiency in the TE department or in the FS department? Our redzone woes, while always an issue, took a dramatic dip after Heath left (from 13th to 16th [we had Greene for a little bit] and down to 31st this year). So, IMO, an increase in TE production is of bigger benefit than than an increase in FS production over the next couple of years.

With that in mind, I think a perfect scenario would be, in order . . .

Designate Vance McDonald a post-June 1 cut.
Extend Mitchell's contract two years and backloading the base salary to the final year while spreading out his cap hit. (Or, if we can upgrade for a better cap hit, then do so, but I doubt we will be able to).
Sign a FA TE that can come in and contribute right away.
Sign a FA backup ILB and OLB (assuming Harrison retires) that can step in for several games if a LB is injured. (Currently, we have it at OLB, but I'm not comfortable with our backup ILBs if they have to start several games).
2018 draft—find a QB if available (or trade out of the first round to couple 1st round picks for the following year).
2018 draft—find a TE if available and not found in FA
2018 draft—take a small-school or position-conversion shot at a FS that will sit behind Mitchell for a year, then compete with him for the job.

2019 draft—follow the above order for drafting whatever positions were not filled in the 2018 draft.
_____________________________________________

Now, back to the topic at hand . . .

Anyone wonder if Sutton can transition to FS? It seems to play to all his strengths and negates most of his weaknesses (if going by draft analysis). I especially like the idea that he has good closing speed, good hands, and can jump routes.

Born2Steel
11-22-2017, 02:50 PM
One could surmise that your statement that "every FAN prefers Mitchell over Golden proves he has value to the team" is an example that means nothing to the conversation.... Could it not? What does "fan opinion" of a player do that directly correlates to value? If that were true, John Kuhn would be making $20 million a year. :)

I never said he does nothing for the team and don't agree with that statement, whoever said it. Fan opinion of a player is as irrelevant as personal taste to a players value in the NFL. As I said before, Mike Mitchell's career in the NFL is that of a 2nd round pick that never lived up to expecations and his career peaked his 1 season in Carolina. He will be 31 next year and is on the decline in play, so it makes sense to plan for his future and I hope that is addressed this offseason.

"One could surmise..." :baby:

- - - Updated - - -


Let's go at this discussion from another direction. What personnel moves, in order, do you think we need to make this offseason in order to be more competitive in the next two to three years while keeping the salary cap in mind?

Starting in 2018, the Steelers will be have $-11,936,687 of cap space. My guess is J. J. Wilcox will be dropped (article in another post in this thread). That is $3,125,000. Shazier has a base salary (and cap hit) of 8.7 million next year, which is the final year of his contract (up from a cap hit of 3.025 mill this year). However, his production puts him in line for an average salary of 11-12 mill a year (in the range of Vontaze Burfict to Luke Kuechly, or in between the eight and twelveth highest average salaries). So no cap room there unless we sign him to a six or seven year deal and spread out a smaller signing bonus along with roster bonuses along the way. This list doesn't even account for Le'Veon Bell and his cap hit. So, we're going to be in serious cap trouble next year without a lot of restructuring that.

Now, that being said . . .

Mike Mitchell is a 8.1 mill hit against the cap with 1.76 mill as dead money if he is released. Vance McDonald is 4.6 mill against the cap with 0 dead money if he is released. So, what of personnel moves? Dropping Mitchell gives us back 6.34 mill in cap money and dropping McDonald gives us 1.74 million less. Is Mitchell's contribution worth more than 1.74 mill compared to McDonald's contribution to the team? Absolutely. So, McDonald gets cut (in my scenario). Now, with the TEs we have left, is there a bigger deficiency in the TE department or in the FS department? Our redzone woes, while always an issue, took a dramatic dip after Heath left (from 13th to 16th [we had Greene for a little bit] and down to 31st this year). So, IMO, an increase in TE production is of bigger benefit than than an increase in FS production over the next couple of years.

With that in mind, I think a perfect scenario would be, in order . . .

Designate Vance McDonald a post-June 1 cut.
Extend Mitchell's contract two years and backloading the base salary to the final year while spreading out his cap hit. (Or, if we can upgrade for a better cap hit, then do so, but I doubt we will be able to).
Sign a FA TE that can come in and contribute right away.
Sign a FA backup ILB and OLB (assuming Harrison retires) that can step in for several games if a LB is injured. (Currently, we have it at OLB, but I'm not comfortable with our backup ILBs if they have to start several games).
2018 draft—find a QB if available (or trade out of the first round to couple 1st round picks for the following year).
2018 draft—find a TE if available and not found in FA
2018 draft—take a small-school or position-conversion shot at a FS that will sit behind Mitchell for a year, then compete with him for the job.

2019 draft—follow the above order for drafting whatever positions were not filled in the 2018 draft.
_____________________________________________

Now, back to the topic at hand . . .

Anyone wonder if Sutton can transition to FS? It seems to play to all his strengths and negates most of his weaknesses (if going by draft analysis). I especially like the idea that he has good closing speed, good hands, and can jump routes.

Sort of a short, sweet reaction to your indepth post, but all I really want to say is I would be on board with most of that right now.

SteelerFanInStl
11-22-2017, 03:11 PM
Article (https://247sports.com/nfl/pittsburgh-steelers/Bolt/Robert-Golden-has-replaced-JJ-Wilcox-as-No-3-safety-for-Pittsbur-109763616) is about a month old, but somewhat of an answer without the specifics you may be looking for...

"J.J. Wilcox has been a huge disappointment for the Pittsburgh Steelers since arriving via trade at the end of the preseason. Expected to be a stabilizing force for their secondary, the pass-defense has actually been great... no thanks to Wilcox. His playing time has been reduced each week, and now, it seems, we have a change on the depth chart.

Chris Adamski of The Tribune-Review reports that Robert Golden, not Wilcox, seems to be the No. 3 safety on the depth chart at the moment.

That shouldn't come as any sort of surprise to those who have been watching the games. Golden played 33 defensive snaps against the Lions on Sunday. That's a lot even for a No. 3 safety, proving that the Steelers are gaining more and more faith in him as potentially big part of their defense even with Mike Mitchell and Sean Davis entrenched as the starters. Moving forward, it seems as though those three safeties will be the rotation.

Wilcox, on the other hand, played only one defensive snap on Sunday. He has played nine snaps in the past four weeks after playing a ridiculous 69 against the Baltimore Ravens the week before that stretch started. The Steelers have seen what Wilcox has to offer and have chosen to go in a different direction.

The Steelers have such a dominant pass-defense this year that shuffling parts around the back end likely won't have a major impact, but Mitchell and Davis could both easily get injured. If Golden has outplayed Wilcox so far, he deserves to be the Steeler to step up should a new starter be necessary.

Wilcox was an aggressive move to try to upgrade the defense right now. It was the right attitude for the Steelers, who hit a home run in that regard with the signing of Joe Haden, but ultimately Wilcox just didn't live up to expectations. He'll likely be a backup and special teams player for the rest of the year."

Thanks but unfortunately that article doesn't tell me anything as to WHY he's supposedly been "a huge disappointment". He seemed to play well during games.