View Full Version : What Did We Learn Today?
Craic
09-25-2016, 08:57 PM
Before we get started . . .
PLEASE - IF YOU WANT TO SPEW, DO IT IN ANOTHER THREAD. I'm looking for intelligent football discussion, not FIRez dA COACHES rants. Got a problem with the coaching... lay it out, specifically without broad sweeps and what-ifs. In other words, I'd like to get into some good, series critique which means laying aside emotion and truly evaluating what we saw, good and bad.
--------------
Okay, so, what did we learn today. For me . . .
1. Timmons is a lot more important to this team that most people thought.
Did anyone else notice the minute he was gone from the middle, the run game just ate us up? I know there's a few around here that aren't impressed with him, but I think he's much bigger in the defense than we're giving him credit for.
2. Ben still isn't the consistent QB we hoped he was.
No, I'm not pinning the whole loss on Ben, there were drops that literally hit guys in the hands. But I also noticed at least a half-dozen balls sailing over heads while WRs were in route--simple overthrows. I also noticed at least once or twice Ben could have stepped up and jogged for a FD, but he made the bad decision to move backwards or sideways, or once, just throw the ball away rather than running 4 yards and sliding. He was off last week as well, so I'm beginning to wonder what's going on. Hope it's just a 2 game stretch of "oops!" and nothing more than that (And I also reserve the right to put some blame on young WRs).
3. Bend but don't break defense, broke today.
As was asked last week, what happens when the bend but don't break defense, breaks. You got your answer. Now, as to why the defense broke today . . . I'm less convinced they broke due to scheme as I am they broke because the offense couldn't keep them off the field at all, and they got tired. Real tired. Add to that injures, and Viola! Nevertheless, they're going to be licking wounds for a couple of days.
4. Certain CBs are coming along.
Artie had another defended pass today and Cockrill had a nice break up in the endzone. I think sometime this season, we may see Cockrill develop into a decent to good CB and become pleased with Artie's play. Yeah, he still has mistakes, but at this point, I'm more excited by the things he's doing right, than the things he's doing wrong.
5. AB doesn't look as though he's having fun out there.
I don't know what it is, but AB just didn't look special today. Yeah, he had a good day, but it really felt like he was, well . . . not mailing it in, because he put in hard work, but something's happening behind the scenes possibly. Maybe that's the problem with the whole offense right now. Who knows?
6. We are 2-1 with no AFC losses.
Despite how bad this feels, a quick glance at the board shows we're still very ahead of the game. Browns and Bengals are already trailing by two games (tie breaker with Bengals). Ravens are only 1 game ahead of us, and we play them, twice still. Somehow, I feel like we're going to be in control of our destiny for quite a long time.
Shoes
09-25-2016, 09:05 PM
I think IF the Steelers keep J. Jones after this season he should be a backup. I believe he works hard but he just doesn't have it. Pass rushers are still a big need for this defense.
This kind of play from Jones is very common!
http://i.makeagif.com/media/9-26-2016/nZAbHT.gif (http://makeagif.com/nZAbHT)
tube517
09-25-2016, 09:19 PM
5. AB doesn't look as though he's having fun out there.
I don't know what it is, but AB just didn't look special today. Yeah, he had a good day, but it really felt like he was, well . . . not mailing it in, because he put in hard work, but something's happening behind the scenes possibly. Maybe that's the problem with the whole offense right now. Who knows?
It may seem that way but they were behind all game and he didn't look like his usual mood.
The ass whooping was felt in all aspects of the game.
Mojouw
09-25-2016, 09:26 PM
The defense broke because it lost its middle before the end of the second quarter. Timmons, Shazier, and Golden. That just gutted whatever gameplan that Butler might have had.
Combine that with no outside pass rush - and well it just isn't surprising. What kind of gameplan to stop screens and misdirections can you implement on the fly with LJ Fort, Vince Illiams, and Sean Davis all having zero reps working together?
- - - Updated - - -
On offense we learned that Ben is still learning the tendencies of his new targets. He has no chemistry with anyone besides AB on broken plays. Maybe Coates.
Also Jesse James just can't block worth a darn.
Edman
09-25-2016, 09:26 PM
The defense broke because it lost its middle before the end of the second quarter. Timmons, Shazier, and Golden. That just gutted whatever gameplan that Butler might have had.
This. There's only so much you do when you lose your best players.
Ryan Shazier is tough enough, but Lawrence Timmons means more to this defense than people give him credit for, and Robert Golden clearly isn't some run of the mill chump change safety.
Mojouw
09-25-2016, 09:35 PM
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2016/09/eagles-screen-game-yac-ed-steelers-defense-sunday/
this is article has all the gory details. Think that Shazier, Timmons, and Golden might have had an impact not that?
Steeldude
09-25-2016, 10:30 PM
Maybe fans here will realize you need a pass rush. The allow every play and pray for a T/O defense does not work.
Craic
09-25-2016, 11:20 PM
Maybe fans here will realize you need a pass rush. The allow every play and pray for a T/O defense does not work.
No one's been saying we don't need one, rather, the absolute emphasis on it without considering the context of rookies, player personnel in general, and the options available to us otherwise is a very limited POV. Nevertheless, I'm not sure what your comment has to do with anything asked in this thread about the team.
Steeldude
09-25-2016, 11:39 PM
No one's been saying we don't need one, rather, the absolute emphasis on it without considering the context of rookies, player personnel in general, and the options available to us otherwise is a very limited POV. Nevertheless, I'm not sure what your comment has to do with anything asked in this thread about the team.
Learned the team needs a pass rush.
hawaiiansteeler
09-25-2016, 11:46 PM
Learned the team needs a pass rush.
without a doubt we need a better pass rush, but how?
Jarvis Jones never developed into the player we thought was worthy of a first round draft choice, Bud Dupree is injured, Deebo is in the twilight of his career, and our DL just aren't getting to the QB.
Keith Butler needs to do some serious re-evaluating imo, what he's doing now just isn't working and perhaps we don't have the necessary players.
I believe we have to draft another pass-rushing OLB in the first two rounds of next year's draft...
Mojouw
09-26-2016, 12:21 AM
Much of this argument assumes a static status quo. That's a poor premise to begin from. Burns and Davis have tackling issues that are extending drives and leading to points. Either those guys are Antwon Blake 2.0 or they can be "coached up" (another conversation entirely) and the issues resolve for the positive over the next several games.
Another example is that the center of the defense did not hold today. When is the next time both ILBs and a safety go out in the same game? The receivers will get better with every game rep. 9-7 or 10-6 usually makes the playoffs. I do not care how good this team is in week 3, I care how good they are in week 12+.
The pass rush is a disaster right now. That's extremely concerning. But saying the answer is to run Harrison out there 50 snaps a game is foolish. Even if he is the best edge rusher on the roster what good is sapping his legs by week 6?
The biggest question for me us the defenses dependence on Shazier to be a sideline to sideline answer for the screen and misdirection game. We all saw what happens when he can't fill that role.
Similarly much of Haleys short passing game is dependent on Tes and hbacks blocking on the edge for short YAC driven routes for AB and whoever comes out of the slot or that 3 receiver stack that both Arians and Haley are obsessed with.
Am I watching different games from everyone else?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shoes
09-26-2016, 12:30 AM
Why not try Gravedigger on the edge?
Mojouw
09-26-2016, 12:33 AM
We also painfully learned that Feeney not being able to contribute sucks balls. Anyone else think that his athleticism might be an amazing assets in dub packages filling a Duane Buchannon role at the linebacker level against screens and backs in the flat? I believe they had him targeted for that and it didn't work out.
It also sucks that shamarko is stupid because he profiles as a destroyer of screens and obliterator of running backs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mojouw
09-26-2016, 12:40 AM
One more thing. The beer might be talking but we learned a great deal about Chickfilet, Moats, and Hargrave.
Moats is a replacement level backer. I think he would be better inside as a two down thumper. But Fort and Williams already fill that role so he is miscast as an edge rusher.
Chickfilet and Hargrave are simply not ready for primetime yet. Hargrave is a rookie and Chickfilet is a tweeter. He needs to play too light to be quick and the isn't bulky enough to overpower tackles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BlackAndGold
09-26-2016, 03:16 AM
We kinda knew is wasn't a strength but, the whole OLB position sucks.
Jarvis? back up player
Moats? same as Jarvis
Harrison? for a 38 year old he can play, but he isn't a starter.
Chickillo? He should be nicknamed "Mr. August" since he's been noting but hype so far.
You won't be playing in February if you can't get pressure on the QB, it's just the truth.
I won't be shocked if the same outcome happens against Kansas City next week.
teegre
09-26-2016, 06:21 AM
I believe we have to draft another pass-rushing OLB in the first two rounds of next year's draft...
Uh oh... people will lose their minds if that happens.
86WARD
09-26-2016, 06:28 AM
The defense broke because it lost its middle before the end of the second quarter. Timmons, Shazier, and Golden. That just gutted whatever gameplan that Butler might have had.
Combine that with no outside pass rush - and well it just isn't surprising. What kind of gameplan to stop screens and misdirections can you implement on the fly with LJ Fort, Vince Illiams, and Sean Davis all having zero reps working together?
- - - Updated - - -
On offense we learned that Ben is still learning the tendencies of his new targets. He has no chemistry with anyone besides AB on broken plays. Maybe Coates.
Also Jesse James just can't block worth a darn.
Shazier wasn't really stopping Sproles when he was in there...just saying...
teegre
09-26-2016, 06:40 AM
What we learned...
1. Heath is sorely missed.
BB had James wide open with a clear path for a touchdown, but BB threw it too far to the right. That is a theme that I've seen: BB doesn't have the timing down with the receivers (whereas, he KNEW where Heath would be). Also, on a third-&-seven, Rogers caught a pass, needed 2 more yards, and James was right in front of him (by design). James missed the block, and Rogers was stopped one yard short. Heath makes that block 10 out of 10 times.
That is a touchdown and a first down missed (replaced by two punts). Speaking of which...
2. Wheaton needs reps/confidence.
He hadn't played in a month... and it showed. He dropped a touchdown and first down (replaced by a missed FG and a punt).
3. Momentum is almost as important as a good gameplan.
If Wheaton catches that TD, this is an entirely different game. The subsequent blocked FG did not help matters. From that point on, it felt like the offense was just waiting for something bad to happen: D-Will dropped a pass or two, AB seemed to not get the necessary yards to keep drives going, and the O-line played timid.
On the defensive side, the Sproles run was the back-breaker. From that point on, everything that the Eagles did seemed to work (because, it seemed like the Steelers expected the Eagles to have success).
tube517
09-26-2016, 06:50 AM
Shazier wasn't really stopping Sproles when he was in there...just saying...
Tomlin mentioned "MCL re-aggravated". I don't really like hearing that.
- - - Updated - - -
What we learned...
1. Heath is sorely missed.
BB had James wide open with a clear path for a touchdown, but BB threw it too far to the right. That is a theme that I've seen: BB doesn't have the timing down with the receivers (whereas, he KNEW where Heath would be). Also, on a third-&-seven, Rogers caught a pass, needed 2 more yards, and James was right in front of him (by design). James missed the block, and Rogers was stopped one yard short. Heath makes that block 10 out of 10 times.
That is a touchdown and a first down missed (replaced by two punts). Speaking of which...
2. Wheaton needs reps/confidence.
He hadn't played in a month... and it showed. He dropped a touchdown and first down (replaced by a missed FG and a punt).
3. Momentum is almost as important as a good gameplan.
If Wheaton catches that TD, this is an entirely different game. The subsequent blocked FG did not help matters. From that point on, it felt like the offense was just waiting for something bad to happen: D-Will dropped a pass or two, AB seemed to not get the necessary yards to keep drives going, and the O-line played timid.
On the defensive side, the Sproles run was the back-breaker. From that point on, everything that the Eagles did seemed to work (because, it seemed like the Steelers expected the Eagles to have success).
I wonder if we see more DHB. He can block and we don't know Eli's injury.
Steelerschik
09-26-2016, 07:01 AM
I learned that the Steelers can still look bipolar week to week, as long as they make the POs I'll accept that. I have also learned that our defense isn't as good as I thought they were, despite reading some very knowledgeable posts from people on here...I thought they might be wrong, they weren't. I also learned that Boz isn't invincible and can have an off day too. In my heart I think they'll struggle here and there, but I think in the end they'll be in the mix of things. I hope they gel, I hope injuries won't haunt us cause I know our depth isn't great. But I know no matter what, my faith in this team runs deep and I learned that no matter how shitty they look, I'll be picking them to win the next week any way and I'll continue to bitch, moan and groan when they play like the fucktards they were yesterday.
lotas
09-26-2016, 08:23 AM
What we learned...
1. Heath is sorely missed.
BB had James wide open with a clear path for a touchdown, but BB threw it too far to the right. That is a theme that I've seen: BB doesn't have the timing down with the receivers (whereas, he KNEW where Heath would be). Also, on a third-&-seven, Rogers caught a pass, needed 2 more yards, and James was right in front of him (by design). James missed the block, and Rogers was stopped one yard short. Heath makes that block 10 out of 10 times.
That is a touchdown and a first down missed (replaced by two punts). Speaking of which...
2. Wheaton needs reps/confidence.
He hadn't played in a month... and it showed. He dropped a touchdown and first down (replaced by a missed FG and a punt).
3. Momentum is almost as important as a good gameplan.
If Wheaton catches that TD, this is an entirely different game. The subsequent blocked FG did not help matters. From that point on, it felt like the offense was just waiting for something bad to happen: D-Will dropped a pass or two, AB seemed to not get the necessary yards to keep drives going, and the O-line played timid.
On the defensive side, the Sproles run was the back-breaker. From that point on, everything that the Eagles did seemed to work (because, it seemed like the Steelers expected the Eagles to have success).
I'm with you, Teeg. It had something to do with the energy, which affects mindset and confidence, which in turn reinforces the negative energy and leads to something like the 3rd quarter meltdown.
I already had that feeling of "Oh boy, here we go" going in to the game based on our past difficulties with the Eagles. After Wheaton dropped that pass and the FG was blocked I knew it wasn't going to be a good game. Hell, that happened in the early-mid 1st quarter and in my mind I already felt it was out of reach, that the energy was going to swing and not come back.
I think this loss is as much on the Eagles' success as it is the Steelers shortcomings. The Eagles absolutely dominated in their performance, you could see Ben was rattled because he had nowhere to go with the ball on his drop back, and by the time he looked for an alternate option the pass rush was in his face. Did you see how well the DB's were covering our WR's, they just couldn't get separation.
Learn from the loss and move on. Most importantly this squad needs to get their fluid cohesiveness back, and regain their confidence to know they can take control of the game and swing the energy when they need to. The defense needs to register a few sacks and TO's in the next few weeks.
Le'Veon Bell brings a spark back to this offense that can help reignite them. I can't wait to watch Bell again, this offense is just in another tier altogether with him in. The defense doesn't get to just sit back and swarm the WR's like they did today.
tube517
09-26-2016, 08:25 AM
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2016/09/gut-reactions-steelers-vs-eagles-week-2/
stillers4me
09-26-2016, 08:33 AM
Sometimes QB's and teams have really, really good games. Sometimes they have really, really bad games.
Carson Wentz and the Eagles had a really, really good day on the same day the Ben and the Steelers had a really, really bad day.
Neither are likely as good or as bad as they appeared to be yesterday.
Moving on to next week.
EzraTank
09-26-2016, 09:07 AM
I think IF the Steelers keep J. Jones after this season he should be a backup. I believe he works hard but he just doesn't have it. Pass rushers are still a big need for this defense.
This kind of play from Jones is very common!
http://i.makeagif.com/media/9-26-2016/nZAbHT.gif (http://makeagif.com/nZAbHT)
I totally agree with this. If his team just got ONE guy like James Harrison in his prime (think Von Miller) that could get up field and put pressure on the pocket the whole defense changes. If you have a guy like that then teams will be forced to double them or keep a TE/RB out of passing and other guys open up to get there.
This team is missing ONE player on defense and that's it.
steelerdude15
09-26-2016, 09:21 AM
I think IF the Steelers keep J. Jones after this season he should be a backup. I believe he works hard but he just doesn't have it. Pass rushers are still a big need for this defense.
This kind of play from Jones is very common!
http://i.makeagif.com/media/9-26-2016/nZAbHT.gif (http://makeagif.com/nZAbHT)
The Steelers need to do the right thing and not resign him after this year. You're right, Jarvis doesn't have it. He can't seal the edge against the run, break off blockers to make a play, and can't use his rush skills to get by an offensive linemen. He shouldn't even be starting.
- - - Updated - - -
Tomlin mentioned "MCL re-aggravated". I don't really like hearing that.
I think Ryan finished with 2 tackles. If he's having MCL issues, I would imagine he wouldn't be that effective. Might have to go with Vince until Ryan is healed.
Moose
09-26-2016, 09:34 AM
As Ben said, " uh, we stunk."
SteelMayhem72
09-26-2016, 09:34 AM
shazier cant stay healthy so he needs to go...jarvis jones just sucks and needs to go...if you dont contribute in a positive way then you dont need to be on the field. Ive always been a fan of timmons and he is the leader on defense and it now shows...hes a good ball player imho.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
SteelMayhem72
09-26-2016, 09:38 AM
im thinking we may have a similar outcome with KC knowing peterson came from there and there styles on offense are very similar. Misdirection plays have been a problem for us the last several years...we over pursue and nobody to cover the back side...they better get a handle on that cause that is a huge blueprint against our Defense
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
DesertSteel
09-26-2016, 11:01 AM
We learned that the Eagles are a much better team than the Steelers.
Dwinsgames
09-26-2016, 11:06 AM
the only way IMO you can get a pass rush with the current group of players is to put rookies on an island and hope the pass rush gets there quickly enough because if they do not we will be burnt deep and burn a lot ..
this isnt a new problem , we are just noticing it more because the front 3 are not getting it done in the pass rush department ( not that they where ever intended to do so in a 3-4 alignment ) but they did out of necessity last year ...
Wentz is not a good barometer of a pass rush though because even with a great pass rush we wouldn't have touched him much , he gets the ball out as quick or quicker than just about anyone ...
awe1028
09-26-2016, 11:13 AM
I believe we have to draft another pass-rushing OLB in the first two rounds of next year's draft...
Uh oh... people will lose their minds if that happens.
I wouldn't. I was calling for them to select Spence so I certainly would not be upset if they selected one in the upcoming draft. The problem is that assuming the Steelers will be a playoff team, they will be picking at the bottom of the draft which means the odds that they will have access to the top level pass rushing OLBs will be low. That's why it was such a huge faux pas when they failed to select Spence when they had the chance
Mojouw
09-26-2016, 11:13 AM
the only way IMO you can get a pass rush with the current group of players is to put rookies on an island and hope the pass rush gets there quickly enough because if they do not we will be burnt deep and burn a lot ..
Wentz is not a good barometer of a pass rush though because even with a great pass rush we wouldn't have touched him much , he gets the ball out as quick or quicker than just about anyone ...
This is the core of it for me. The skill set of the secondary is a bit chopped up. Cockrell, Burns, and Gilbert are man corners. Most of their problems go away if they just have to run with someone. Gay, Golson (if he ever plays football again), Davis, Mitchell, and Golden are all best suited for zone. At some point, at least if I was the coordinator, I would consider running some combo of Burns/Gilbert/Cockrell in man coverages on the outsides and the rest play a zone. Free up another LB or two to pass rush.
Wentz was "poised" yesterday - but it wasn't like he challenged the defense. What, maybe a dozen throws over 6 yards? Getting beat deep wasn't the problem. It was short area stuff. No pass rush gets home in 2.5 seconds. It was missing all of the middle defenders (shazier (I know he played but he was hobbled), timmons, and golden). Those guys are all intended to cover and blow-up screens.
steelreserve
09-26-2016, 11:23 AM
What did we learn?
1) You won't get any pressure on the QB if you don't try. Does our pass rush suck that bad? I honestly don't even know. All we've been doing is lining up and saying "here are the four guys who will be rushing, go ahead and block them" and the offense says "OK, no problem, we'll be sure to do that." We haven't even been using any defensive looks that could keep the offense off balance, much less actually rushing aggressively. I can probably count on one hand the number of actual blitzes I've seen this season. Simply dropping a pass-rushing linebacker into coverage and rushing a different linebacker instead (surprise!), so that you still have four guys rushing, does not count as an aggressive rush or a "blitz."
2) Shazier cannot cover the tight end. He may be fast, but for whatever reason he is just not the answer there and never has been. I really think this role demands a safety, or at least a different LB who specializes in it. Thought maybe Feeney was taken to be that guy, but I don't know if we'll see him this season. At any rate, what we are doing is not working, and this has been a thorn in our side for going on a decade now.
3) Our receiving corps is Brown plus a bunch of situational guys. Nobody else can get open, which is a huge problem. Neither Wheaton nor Coates is looking like a real #2 receiver. Coates gives you the occasional big play and then disappears for 95% of the game. Wheaton was a good #3 but has failed in a more prominent role, and yesterday's performance was just horrid. Rogers is an OK slot receiver and nothing more; I hate to say it, but those kinds of receivers are a dime a dozen. The tight ends have some promise, but are a pretty mediocre bunch right now and have obvious exploits. Why haven't we seen DHB on the field? He's shown that he can at least get out there and provide an occasional spark, plus make some of those mid-range plays that nobody else on the team seems capable of making right now.
There's always a bunch of other little niggling stuff about playcalling and stopping the run, but I think those are the big ones, and a lot of our other problems are waterfall effects of them.
Born2Steel
09-26-2016, 01:17 PM
On the AB front, blame Bryant and Bell. Wheaton and Coates are inconsistent at best, DHB can't stay in the game which tells me he's not the answer or he would be out there more. The offense will only improve with Bell back.
Shazier can cover anyone. But that's not his main responsibility in zone.
No pass rush because we have none. you are correct.
Dwinsgames
09-26-2016, 02:29 PM
Why haven't we seen DHB on the field? He's shown that he can at least get out there and provide an occasional spark, plus make some of those mid-range plays that nobody else on the team seems capable of making right now.
we did , the tie of possession in the end zone which they called a INT ( when all ties are supposed to go to the offense )
that was DHB he actually aided the defender to come down with part of the ball while trying to make a play himself , I do not fault him for that he was trying to make a play .. I also have issue to the refs giving the ball to the eagles on what to me was a tie in possession both guys had the ball ...
but to steal a line from the much hated (and rightfully so ) Hillary Clinton at this point what difference does it make .............
Craic
09-26-2016, 02:31 PM
Much of this argument assumes a static status quo. That's a poor premise to begin from. Burns and Davis have tackling issues that are extending drives and leading . . .
Nope, I think you pretty much nailed it on a lot of things. A couple minor points . . . the middle wasn't soft to begin with (run support, I mean), it only went soft when Timmons got injured. Also, our two starting DB rookies, I think, are playing a more solid game already than we saw last year from certain DBs. Other than that, I'm in agreement with much of what you posted.
What we learned...
1. Heath is sorely missed.
2. Wheaton needs reps/confidence.
3. Momentum is almost as important as a good gameplan.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Heath: I think he's missed as much or more for his blocking, but yeah, we don't have the safety valve we had in him. A shame, too. I'm wondering if the TE position is beginning to climb up the draft charts for the Steelers.
I totally agree with this. If his team just got ONE guy like James Harrison in his prime (think Von Miller) that could get up field and put pressure on the pocket the whole defense changes. If you have a guy like that then teams will be forced to double them or keep a TE/RB out of passing and other guys open up to get there.
This team is missing ONE player on defense and that's it.
I have to disagree . . . I think we're missing a couple of guys. Most likely, our two OLBs. Maybe three with Timmons injured.
the only way IMO you can get a pass rush with the current group of players is to put rookies on an island and hope the pass rush gets there quickly enough because if they do not we will be burnt deep and burn a lot ..
this isnt a new problem , we are just noticing it more because the front 3 are not getting it done in the pass rush department ( not that they where ever intended to do so in a 3-4 alignment ) but they did out of necessity last year ...
Wentz is not a good barometer of a pass rush though because even with a great pass rush we wouldn't have touched him much , he gets the ball out as quick or quicker than just about anyone ...
Honestly, there's not a thing I can disagree with here. Good observations.
What did we learn?
1) You won't get any pressure on the QB if you don't try. Does our pass rush suck that bad? I honestly don't even know. All we've been doing is lining up and saying "here are the four guys who will be rushing, go ahead and block them" and the offense says "OK, no problem, we'll be sure to do that." We haven't even been using any defensive looks that could keep the offense off balance, much less actually rushing aggressively. I can probably count on one hand the number of actual blitzes I've seen this season. Simply dropping a pass-rushing linebacker into coverage and rushing a different linebacker instead (surprise!), so that you still have four guys rushing, does not count as an aggressive rush or a "blitz."
2) Shazier cannot cover the tight end. He may be fast, but for whatever reason he is just not the answer there and never has been. I really think this role demands a safety, or at least a different LB who specializes in it. Thought maybe Feeney was taken to be that guy, but I don't know if we'll see him this season. At any rate, what we are doing is not working, and this has been a thorn in our side for going on a decade now.
3) Our receiving corps is Brown plus a bunch of situational guys. Nobody else can get open, which is a huge problem. Neither Wheaton nor Coates is looking like a real #2 receiver. Coates gives you the occasional big play and then disappears for 95% of the game. Wheaton was a good #3 but has failed in a more prominent role, and yesterday's performance was just horrid. Rogers is an OK slot receiver and nothing more; I hate to say it, but those kinds of receivers are a dime a dozen. The tight ends have some promise, but are a pretty mediocre bunch right now and have obvious exploits. Why haven't we seen DHB on the field? He's shown that he can at least get out there and provide an occasional spark, plus make some of those mid-range plays that nobody else on the team seems capable of making right now.
There's always a bunch of other little niggling stuff about playcalling and stopping the run, but I think those are the big ones, and a lot of our other problems are waterfall effects of them.
Now that's the way to break it down.
1) yep. Again, I've argued that they did it to protect their rookie DBs, but I also said that they need to be put on an island at times so they can mature and let the pass rush start to develop. This game is the perfect picture of why they needed to start doing that. And honestly, it was interacting with your posts last week that made me think more about it and come to that position.
2) I wouldn't know. Instead of going to the sports bar to watch the game, I decided, "Hey! It's playing on local TV—let's watch it at home!" Yeah, so the Browns game goes into OT, which means I didn't get to see the first 10 minutes of the Steelers game. Then, after the 3rd quarter, they switched it to another game. I need to watch NFL replay to see what I missed, but I keep feeling as though I'm going to throw up just thinking about watching the game again.
3) Wheaton I'll give a pass too, as this is his first game back and needs to get the rust knocked off. But for the rest, yeah, you're right. I'm with you on getting DHB on the field. I think Rogers in his first playing-season has shown upside, so I'll be patient with him as well, he may develop into more, heck same is true with Coates. BUT, our problem is we're having to depend on Wheaton, Coates, and Rogers WAY too much right now. One bright light in that mess—our second best WR is coming back this week.
86WARD
09-26-2016, 03:29 PM
It's becoming more evident each week that Coates is nothing but a one trick pony...more so than Mike Wallace ever was.
Mojouw
09-26-2016, 03:32 PM
It's becoming more evident each week that Coates is nothing but a one trick pony...more so than Mike Wallace ever was.
I don't see that. I see a guy that is flashing the ability to be the 2nd best WR on the team and is criminally underused. I think the trouble is that no one wants to set the precedent that Wheaton can get Wally Pipped. Also, Eli Rogers likely looks better in practice than Coates. Coates plays better on gamedays.
86WARD
09-26-2016, 03:34 PM
I don't see that in Coates at all. All I see is him running down the sideline and possibly making the catch. I don't see any flashes of a number 2. I see more flashes in Rogers than I do Coates.
st33lersguy
09-26-2016, 10:11 PM
What did we learn?
1) You won't get any pressure on the QB if you don't try. Does our pass rush suck that bad? I honestly don't even know. All we've been doing is lining up and saying "here are the four guys who will be rushing, go ahead and block them" and the offense says "OK, no problem, we'll be sure to do that." We haven't even been using any defensive looks that could keep the offense off balance, much less actually rushing aggressively. I can probably count on one hand the number of actual blitzes I've seen this season. Simply dropping a pass-rushing linebacker into coverage and rushing a different linebacker instead (surprise!), so that you still have four guys rushing, does not count as an aggressive rush or a "blitz."
I agree, the defensive "scheme" if you can call it that has been so unimaginative and bland. Last year they were more creative with their blitzes and got 48 sacks. This year it is so incredibly bland and unimaginative. Plus Gay is capable, Cockrell helped limit AJ Green to two catches, Mitchell is capable, and even Artie has shown an ability to bat down passes one-on-one, are you telling me we have to rush 4 guys and telegraph who they are every single play just to protect the secondary? And you are also telling me, telegraphing which 4 guys a 5 man o-line needs to blocks and making it easier to pass protect is better for the secondary than an unexpected rusher that can reduce the time allotted for finding a receiver?
steelreserve
09-27-2016, 05:15 AM
I agree, the defensive "scheme" if you can call it that has been so unimaginative and bland. Last year they were more creative with their blitzes and got 48 sacks. This year it is so incredibly bland and unimaginative. Plus Gay is capable, Cockrell helped limit AJ Green to two catches, Mitchell is capable, and even Artie has shown an ability to bat down passes one-on-one, are you telling me we have to rush 4 guys and telegraph who they are every single play just to protect the secondary? And you are also telling me, telegraphing which 4 guys a 5 man o-line needs to blocks and making it easier to pass protect is better for the secondary than an unexpected rusher that can reduce the time allotted for finding a receiver?
It depends. Is my last name Butler? Then I might be telling you that. Is my last name Idontwantashittypassdefense? Then no, I'm not telling you that.
Steeldude
09-27-2016, 07:11 AM
without a doubt we need a better pass rush, but how?
Jarvis Jones never developed into the player we thought was worthy of a first round draft choice, Bud Dupree is injured, Deebo is in the twilight of his career, and our DL just aren't getting to the QB.
Keith Butler needs to do some serious re-evaluating imo, what he's doing now just isn't working and perhaps we don't have the necessary players.
I believe we have to draft another pass-rushing OLB in the first two rounds of next year's draft...
They could try using Chickillo more. He may or may not be the answer, but it's worth a shot. Perhaps stay in there 3-4 more often. Their dime and nickel doesn't stop pass anyway.
They could use Gilbert(aka Boykin) to help the secondary now rather than in game 14.
I agree with you on needing to draft another OLB, but I hope they don't reach for any OLB with the first pick.
Craic
09-27-2016, 02:16 PM
It depends. Is my last name Butler? Then I might be telling you that. Is my last name Idontwantashittypassdefense? Then no, I'm not telling you that.
I might be wrong, but I think his questions where rhetorical and that he's actually agreeing with everything you said.
On top of which, St33lersguy makes some good points. Gay can cover. Cockrell did a good job limiting Green. Now, granted, that's probably because he had help over the top quite often—although a caveat, I haven't gone back to study the tape. Anyone else have a better memory of that game? So, start by putting Gay on an island 7-10 plays a game. Roll the safety over cover the top of Cockrell's guy, then drop two LBs into a short zone with underneath responsibility and the remaining safety covering the top. That way the can help CBs cover slot receivers or break off for a TE in a passing route. That leaves five rushers, with the option of rushing a sixth and stacking a LB and safety for middle field coverage.
Would it work? Don't know, but I'd think it'd work better than a pure zone with no pass rush.
Don't know who said it, but I think I'm convinced a true zone defense needs a 4-3 base system to operate from. Otherwise, we just don't have the guys with the beef to push through the line and create pressure.
teegre
09-27-2016, 02:21 PM
They could try using Chickillo more.
When Jarvis got injured, I was hoping that Jarvis would be Wally Pipped.
On a related topic, am I the only one who felt that Chickillo played pretty well...???
tube517
09-27-2016, 03:03 PM
When Jarvis got injured, I was hoping that Jarvis would be Wally Pipped.
On a related topic, am I the only one who felt that Chickillo played pretty well...???
Yes, he did more in less snaps than Jarvis.
Chickfila had only 18 snaps vs Jarvis "The Ghost" Jones 45 snaps. I"m thinking those 18 snaps were when Jarvis got hurt??
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2016/09/steelers-vs-eagles-player-snap-counts-week-3/
Steeldude
09-27-2016, 04:26 PM
When Jarvis got injured, I was hoping that Jarvis would be Wally Pipped.
On a related topic, am I the only one who felt that Chickillo played pretty well...???
Hard to say. I couldn't see him on every play. When I did see him he looked very active. I would like to less of Jones.
86WARD
09-27-2016, 04:32 PM
Chickillo looked much more active and involved than Jones did and his name was called more often by the announcers.
Shoes
09-27-2016, 04:56 PM
I don't see that in Coates at all. All I see is him running down the sideline and possibly making the catch. I don't see any flashes of a number 2. I see more flashes in Rogers than I do Coates.
Agreed, I'm not sold on Coates at all. I just hope Rodges toe injury doesn't cause him to miss much time.
86WARD
09-27-2016, 07:36 PM
According to PFF, David DeCastro allowed six total pressures with two sacks, two hits and two QB hurries and a 42.2 game grade.
Craic
09-28-2016, 01:14 AM
According to PFF, David DeCastro allowed six total pressures with two sacks, two hits and two QB hurries and a 42.2 game grade.
That's interesting. It almost sounds as though he was covering for another lineman. Did Gilbert slip over to help J. James block? If Pouncey had to pay more attention to his left with Foster injured, that might make sense. Just don't often see him have that bad a day, even with mitigating circumstances.
pczach
09-28-2016, 05:53 AM
That's interesting. It almost sounds as though he was covering for another lineman. Did Gilbert slip over to help J. James block? If Pouncey had to pay more attention to his left with Foster injured, that might make sense. Just don't often see him have that bad a day, even with mitigating circumstances.
On one of his sacks allowed, he left his man for Gilbert's man running free for the quarterback. He tried to block the more immediate threat.
That being said, he still didn't play well in this game. It's the worst game I've seen from him in a while.
Craic
09-28-2016, 07:33 PM
On one of his sacks allowed, he left his man for Gilbert's man running free for the quarterback. He tried to block the more immediate threat.
That being said, he still didn't play well in this game. It's the worst game I've seen from him in a while.
I'll be honest, I didn't watch the game that closely. Too frustrated with the network/NFL and their stupid "Won't switch over to the other game" rule. Then, as I said in a previous post, they cut away after the third quarter.
Craic
10-03-2016, 12:35 PM
So, to keep this thread going . . . what did we learn today (Yesterday)?
1. The team can respond to adversity. What a way to come back from the previous game. I wasn't sure what team would show up, I never thought that Steelers team would show up.
2. Maybe Haley has learned how to share? I liked the fact that I saw D.Will on the field carrying the ball a few times throughout the game. Keeps his head in the game more (not that it's been a real problem, but still . . .) and gives Bell a chance to stay healthy possibly. (Tired bodies get injured easier).
3. Artie Burns has some learning to do, but I'm beginning to see why he was drafted by the Steelers. He had one defended pass where he got burned, and then out of sheer athleticism, put on the afterburners and caught up and knocked the ball out as it arrived.
4. Cockerill is slowly turning into a solid CB.
5. Coates looked like he took a decent stop forward last night. He's still catching the ball with his body to much, IMO, but I like what I saw from him last night—not just being a long-ball receiver.
6. TE - I don't know about blocking, but Grimble's catching ability is starting to look pretty good. If I get time, I want to go back and check out what he did on run plays.
The formula for winning is to take what the other team gives up. Let Ben choose the receiver and avoid locking on AB all of the time. Bell looks like the best all around RB in the NFL. He is simply a yards generating machine. Everybody showed up to play and the concentration level was high.
tube517
10-03-2016, 01:23 PM
What I learned is Le'Veon Bell takes this team to a different dimension. He's good enough (actually great) to split wide as a receiver. He can also block.
DeAngelo is a good RB who can block his ass off. He's no Bell in terms of multipurpose but having both on the field makes the defense dizzy.
Edman
10-03-2016, 01:37 PM
I think we all know at this point since the Baltimore playoff game two years ago that Le'Veon Bell takes the Steelers offense to another stratosphere. When he's gone, it's felt all through the offense.
DeAngelo is great at what he does, but the Offense is merely solid when he's in there. Bell turns the Offense great.
tube517
10-03-2016, 01:42 PM
I think we all know at this point since the Baltimore playoff game two years ago that Le'Veon Bell takes the Steelers offense to another stratosphere. When he's gone, it's felt all through the offense.
DeAngelo is great at what he does, but the Offense is merely solid when he's in there. Bell turns the Offense great.
I'm happy they figured out some ways to put them both on the field. It doesn't have to be every down but trying to account for all of these guys??? Haley has to be beating up couches and breaking down rental walls with excitement!
Craic
10-03-2016, 05:06 PM
Another thing I learned, or, I should say, remembered: Bell's one weakness is his lack of break-away speed. He doesn't quite have the top-gear to shift into in the open, which lets him get tracked down from behind and not finish the big runs in the endzone. On a scale of 1-10 for concerns, it's about a 2 for me, but it is something I remembered watching him last night.
pczach
10-04-2016, 05:35 AM
Another thing I learned, or, I should say, remembered: Bell's one weakness is his lack of break-away speed. He doesn't quite have the top-gear to shift into in the open, which lets him get tracked down from behind and not finish the big runs in the endzone. On a scale of 1-10 for concerns, it's about a 2 for me, but it is something I remembered watching him last night.
Nope...he's not an elite burner, but he is off the charts in every other category of rating a running back.
He had 144 yards on just 18 carries, and 178 yards from scrimmage.
He helps his offensive line by being patient and setting up the defense to maximize every carry, and he allows them the time to position themselves to make blocks with how he positions himself to the line of scrimmage. He then explodes through the line and has the power to steamroll and drag players with him.
He consistently got every inch possible each time he touched the ball.
He stoned every blitz in pass protection.
He lined up at WR and was able to consistently beat defenses with his route running and superior hands.
His versatility gives the offense an advantage whether they run or pass.
The guy can do anything. You saw it last night.
He's not even 100% yet. He's going to improve and gain even more confidence with his knee.
He is a special talent. I can live with the lack of world class speed.
steelreserve
10-04-2016, 12:20 PM
1. If you actually try to get pressure on the QB, you will probably get some pressure on the QB. This helped the defense tremendously.
2. Coates does seem to be developing. Although I think also the Chiefs' secondary was having a horrible, horrible night and that rookie CB they have probably isn't ready to be a starter. So my optimism is still cautious. Also DHB >>>>Wheaton.
3. Hargreaves looks like a badass when he is on the field. Not sure why he's had such a minor role to date, but hopefully we see more of him.
4. Either Gilbert and Foster are completely disposable, or Munchak really is that awesome. Probably the second one.
tube517
10-04-2016, 12:28 PM
1. If you actually try to get pressure on the QB, you will probably get some pressure on the QB. This helped the defense tremendously.
2. Coates does seem to be developing. Although I think also the Chiefs' secondary was having a horrible, horrible night and that rookie CB they have probably isn't ready to be a starter. So my optimism is still cautious. Also DHB >>>>Wheaton.
3. Hargreaves looks like a badass when he is on the field. Not sure why he's had such a minor role to date, but hopefully we see more of him.
4. Either Gilbert and Foster are completely disposable, or Munchak really is that awesome. Probably the second one.
BJ Finney was not only an UDFA w/the Steelers but also a walk-on at Kansas State. Munchak needs a lifetime contract w/a raise and a 3 round exhibition with Reggie Nelson in the octagon.
Rotorhead
10-04-2016, 01:37 PM
So, who is Munchak going to trot out at RT? Both Gilbert and Harris are questionable? With Foster also a ?, and Finney filling in at LG, Wallace out, is there anyone left?
tube517
10-04-2016, 01:41 PM
So, who is Munchak going to trot out at RT? Both Gilbert and Harris are questionable? With Foster also a ?, and Finney filling in at LG, Wallace out, is there anyone left?
Hubbard, unfortunately.
SteelerFanInStl
10-04-2016, 04:43 PM
Hubbard, unfortunately.
Yea, Hubbard is the last one and he sucks!!! Ben's going to take a beating if he plays.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.