Surprise! Jobless Claims Up 78,000 Week After Election; PA, OH Worst Hit

[stillers4me]

The Department of Labor has announced that new jobless claims rose by a staggering 78,000 in the first week after the election, reaching a seasonally-adjusted total of 439,000. Over the past year, and in the weeks leading up to the election, jobless claims were said to be declining, dipping as low as 339,000 (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/18/Media-Suddenly-Muted-on-Jobless-Claims), with the media proclaiming that they had reached the "lowest level in more than four years." Now, suddenly, the news seems far less rosy........

Read more @ http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/15/Surprise-Jobless-Claims-Up-Over-75000


Congratulations to all the idiots in Pa and Ohio that reelected this moron....there's always food stamps.

[Shoes]

>snip<

Congratulations to all the idiots in Pa and Ohio that reelected this moron....there's always food stamps.

......or government cheese.

[Mach1]

Congratulations to all the idiots in Pa and Ohio that reelected this moron....there's always food stamps.

Only till they run out of our money.

[fansince'76]

Not to mention increased underemployment (getting hours cut to avoid the ACA):

Florida Restaurateur to Impose Surcharge for ObamaCare (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/florida-restaurateur-to-impose-surcharge-for-obamacare.html)

Yeah, I know - just more greedy, rich right wingers chomping on sour grapes. :rolleyes:

[zulater]

I think more than any one thing the election swung back to Obama on the job's reports that put unemployment under 8%. Anyone with more than half a working brain should have been able to see through that obvious fix in the works, that accounting slight of hand, complete cooking of the books.

But the sheeple allowed the media to use that crock of shit report to change the narrative of the election after the first debate, to say; "look it is working after all, just a little slower than anticipated. We just need to give the President a little longer. Change now might be dangerous."

Well here you go now, faced with the hard cold reality of ever increasing unemployment and an economy that's getting ready to completley derail. All this with an emboldened President who can now finally push through his full Socialist agenda.

Yeah it wasn't worth voting for Romney, cause you know he and Obama are the same guy. :doh:

[Seven]

Yeah it wasn't worth voting for Romney, cause you know he and Obama are the same guy. :doh:

Yeah, Romney's policies were identical to Obama's, if you weren't aware. :chuckle:

[zulater]

Yeah, Romney's policies were identical to Obama's, if you weren't aware. :chuckle:

Yeah because if someone says it's so it must be true.:rolleyes:

[venom]

More free stuff !!!

P.S. Don't forget to add the Hostess people soon

[X-Terminator]

Yeah, Romney's policies were identical to Obama's, if you weren't aware. :chuckle:

They weren't "identical," but they definitely were similar. And I'm sorry, but I'm not going to vote, nor should I have been forced to vote, for someone I did not think was a quality enough candidate, especially as a fiscal conservative, which Romney was clearly NOT. He was another Bush in that regard. Bash away, but I now vote on principle, not just because "he's not the other guy."

[zulater]

They weren't "identical," but they definitely were similar. And I'm sorry, but I'm not going to vote, nor should I have been forced to vote, for someone I did not think was a quality enough candidate, especially as a fiscal conservative, which Romney was clearly NOT. He was another Bush in that regard. Bash away, but I now vote on principle, not just because "he's not the other guy."

In my opinion sometimes being the other guy is more than enough of a reason to pull the lever.

But difference of opinion make the board go around. :hatsoff:

[smokin3000gt]

Yup. Add 18,000+ to that number. Ask those people how well trickle up economics is working for them.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy III using Tapatalk 2.

[ALLD]

I think everybody should be allowed to receive food stamps. It is discrimination I tell you. Unfortunately there are going to be plenty more poor people to where economic criteria will not be an issue.