PDA

View Full Version : Obama 2007 racially charged rant previously covered up by press.



zulater
10-02-2012, 09:33 PM
http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/obama-speech-jeremiah-wright-new-orleans
In a video obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller, then-presidential candidate Barack Obama tells an audience of black ministers, including the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, that the U.S. government shortchanged Hurricane Katrina victims because of racism.

“The people down in New Orleans they don’t care about as much!” Obama shouts in the video, which was shot in June of 2007 at Hampton University in Virginia. By contrast, survivors of Sept. 11 and Hurricane Andrew received generous amounts of aid, Obama explains. The reason? Unlike residents of majority-black New Orleans, the federal government considers those victims “part of the American family.”

The racially charged and at times angry speech undermines Obama’s carefully-crafted image as a leader eager to build bridges between ethnic groups. For nearly 40 minutes, using an accent he almost never adopts in public, Obama describes a racist, zero-sum society, in which the white majority profits by exploiting black America. The mostly black audience shouts in agreement. The effect is closer to an Al Sharpton rally than a conventional campaign event.
Obama gave the speech in the middle of a hotly-contested presidential primary season, but his remarks escaped scrutiny. Reporters in the room seem to have missed or ignored his most controversial statements. The liberal blogger Andrew Sullivan linked to what he described as a “transcript” of the speech, which turned out not to be a transcript at all, but instead the prepared remarks provided by the campaign. In fact, Obama, who was not using a teleprompter, deviated from his script repeatedly and at length, ad libbing lines that he does not appear to have used before any other audience during his presidential run. A local newspaper posted a series of video clips of the speech, but left out key portions. No complete video of the Hampton speech was widely released.

Obama begins his address with “a special shout out” to Jeremiah Wright, the Chicago pastor who nearly derailed Obama’s campaign months later when his sermons attacking Israel and America and accusing the U.S. government of “inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color” became public. To the audience at Hampton, Obama describes Wright as, “my pastor, the guy who puts up with me, counsels me, listens to my wife complain about me. He’s a friend and a great leader. Not just in Chicago, but all across the country.”

By the time Obama appeared at Hampton, Jeremiah Wright had become a political problem. Wright told The New York Times earlier that year that he would no longer be speaking on the campaign’s behalf because his rhetoric was considered too militant. And yet later in the Hampton speech Obama explicitly defends Wright from unnamed critics, a group he describes as “they”: “They had stories about Trinity United Church of Christ, because we talked about black people in church: ‘Oh, that might be a separatist church,’” Obama said mockingly.
The spine of Obama’s speech is a parable about a pregnant woman shot in the stomach during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The baby is born with a bullet in her arm, which doctors successfully remove. That bullet, Obama explains, is a metaphor for the problems facing black America, namely racism. (At a similar speech he gave in April of 2007 at the First AME Church in Los Angeles to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the riots, according to a church member who was there, Obama described the slug as, “the bullet of slavery and Jim Crow.”)

At least 53 people were killed during the chaos in Los Angeles, many of them targeted by mobs because of their skin color. But Obama does not describe the riots as an expression of racism, but rather as the result of it. The burning and shooting and looting, he explains, amounted to “Los Angeles expressing a lingering, ongoing, pervasive legacy, a tragic legacy out of the tragic history of this country, a history this country has never fully come to terms with.”

And with that, Obama pivots to his central point: The Los Angeles riots and Hurricane Katrina have racism in common. “The federal response after Katrina was similar to the response we saw after the riots in LA,” he thunders from the podium. “People in Washington, they wake up, they’re surprised: ‘There’s poverty in our midst! Folks are frustrated! Black people angry!’ Then there’s gonna be some panels, and hearings, and there are commissions and there are reports, and then there’s some aid money, although we don’t always know where it’s going — it can’t seem to get to the people who need it — and nothin’ really changes, except the news coverage quiets down and Anderson Cooper is on to something else.”

It’s at about this point that Obama pauses, apparently agitated, and tells the crowd that he wants to give “one example because this really steams me up,” an example that he notes does not appear in his prepared remarks:

Down in New Orleans, where they still have not rebuilt twenty months later,” he begins, “there’s a law, federal law — when you get reconstruction money from the federal government — called the Stafford Act. And basically it says, when you get federal money, you gotta give a ten percent match. The local government’s gotta come up with ten percent. Every ten dollars the federal government comes up with, local government’s gotta give a dollar.”

“Now here’s the thing,” Obama continues, “when 9-11 happened in New York City, they waived the Stafford Act — said, ‘This is too serious a problem. We can’t expect New York City to rebuild on its own. Forget that dollar you gotta put in. Well, here’s ten dollars.’ And that was the right thing to do. When Hurricane Andrew struck in Florida, people said, ‘Look at this devastation. We don’t expect you to come up with y’own money, here. Here’s the money to rebuild. We’re not gonna wait for you to scratch it together — because you’re part of the American family.’”

That’s not, Obama says, what is happening in majority-black New Orleans. “What’s happening down in New Orleans? Where’s your dollar? Where’s your Stafford Act money?” Obama shouts, angry now. “Makes no sense! Tells me that somehow, the people down in New Orleans they don’t care about as much!”

It’s a remarkable moment, and not just for its resemblance to Kayne West’s famous claim that “George Bush doesn’t care about black people,” but also because of its basic dishonesty. By January of 2007, six months before Obama’s Hampton speech, the federal government had sent at least $110 billion to areas damaged by Katrina. Compare this to the mere $20 billion that the Bush administration pledged to New York City after Sept. 11.

Moreover, the federal government did at times waive the Stafford Act during its reconstruction efforts. On May 25, 2007, just weeks before the speech, the Bush administration sent an additional $6.9 billion to Katrina-effected areas with no strings attached.

As a sitting United States Senator, Obama must have been aware of this. And yet he spent 36 minutes at the pulpit telling a mostly black audience that the U.S. government doesn’t like them because they’re black.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/obama-speech-jeremiah-wright-new-orleans/#ixzz28CAKRxF6

GBMelBlount
10-02-2012, 10:14 PM
What a race baiting poverty pimp.

Can't wait to see this on nbc, cbs and abc...

fansince'76
10-02-2012, 10:25 PM
Can't wait to see this on nbc, cbs and abc...

Oh, you'll be waiting...

Devilsdancefloor
10-02-2012, 11:12 PM
What a race baiting poverty pimp.

Can't wait to see this on nbc, cbs and abc...

you might see it on the history i 50 years

stillers4me
10-02-2012, 11:14 PM
Why is it that half the country can see this guy for what he really is and always has, and the other half is completely clueless?

I couldn't even finish watching that...he makes me gag with his fake accent and his condescending arrogance. I want to watch the debate tomorrow night....but I just can't stomach him.

Devilsdancefloor
10-02-2012, 11:47 PM
Why is it that half the country can see this guy for what he really is and always has, and the other half is completely clueless?

I couldn't even finish watching that...he makes me gag with his fake accent and his condescending arrogance. I want to watch the debate tomorrow night....but I just can't stomach him.

they are not clueless

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

zulater
10-03-2012, 06:28 AM
The Democratic National Committee — armed with the help of dismissive tweets from a variety of journalists — scrambled Tuesday night to attack The Daily Caller for its videos of President Obama’s controversial race comments in 2007 before the story was even published.

Using comments from reporters speculating on TheDC’s report, the Democrats quickly worked to dismiss the story it hadn’t seen yet — which was teased Tuesday afternoon on Sean Hannity’s radio show and on the Drudge Report — by calling it “lame.”

At about 7:30 p.m. ET, the DNC Rapid Response team sent an email to reporters titled “That was Lame,” listing “instant reaction to the latest lame Drudge/Hannity desperation tactics.”

The email merely included tweets from journalists — before the story was published — expressing skepticism and disinterest and the mistaken claim that the video had been published before.

The tweets used by the Democratic National Committee came from reporters at organizations including Politico, BuzzFeed, The Huffington Post, The New York Times, New York Magazine and the Atlantic.

The mere prospect that videos of Obama talking about race and his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, would be published had the committee quickly working to kill the story.

In an attempt to link the story to Republican nominee Mitt Romney, the DNC also sent out an old story about Romney saying he would not make Wright a campaign issue.

Before he knew what was in the story, DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse quickly tweeted his disgust:

Brad Woodhouse@woodhouseb
Drudge + Hannity= Desperate/Pathetic
2 Oct 12 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Brad Woodhouse@woodhouseb
And of course, if the Daily Caller is involved in it you know its complete and utter crap.
2 Oct 12 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Brad Woodhouse@woodhouseb
Man - you know the right wing knows it's in trouble when it dredges up videos that have been on youtube for years as game changers. #lame
2 Oct 12 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Here is the full the text of the DNC email:

Please see below the instant reaction to the latest lame Drudge/Hannity desperation tactics.

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp
Tucker Carlson actually covered Obama’s quiet riot speech on his old MSNBC showhttp://nbcnews.to/QMthLf

Andrew Kaczynski ‏@BuzzFeedAndrew
This speech was actually covered on Tucker Carlson’s MSNBC show Tucker in 2007 oddly enough.

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp
GAMECHANGER – Obama, in Drudge video, says impoverished communities need help regardless of whether or not they’re hit by hurricanes

Nate Silver ‏@fivethirtyeight
The fact that Drudge is trying to make news would weigh against the hypothesis that the polls are tightening.

Sarah Reese Jones ‏@srjones66
HOW YOU CAN TELL THEY ARE LOSING: Fox and Drudge stoop down to Rev Wright again. FYI, this is not working, again.

Jared Keller ‏@jaredbkeller
That’s it? RT @myurow: Here’s the Reverend Wright clip Drudge and Fox are teasing:http://bit.ly/T06uYM

Tim Dickinson ‏@7im I believe this is what they call “grasping at straws”

Ben Smith ‏@BuzzFeedBen
This stuff has all been on YouTube since the last campaign, Obama’s race, religion, pastor known a bit longer

Sam Stein ‏@samsteinhp
nevermind, the part Drudge is teasing about Rev Wright has been on youtube since 2008http://youtu.be/geSRuNtlg24

Stefan Becket ‏@stefanjbecket
That was lame.

Farhad Manjoo ‏@fmanjoo
If Drudge/Hannity really are touting this speech they’re idiots. It’s a fantastic speech. We should be proud a president mad



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/dnc-scrambles-to-deflate-obama-video-before-daily-caller-story-published/#ixzz28ELsRA4W

zulater
10-03-2012, 06:29 AM
The mainstream press is so in the tank for this guy it's sickening! Even before seeing the video they all circle the wagons to protect their hero.

suitanim
10-03-2012, 06:33 AM
I don't really understand, given the rock-bottom gutter-feeding nature of Obama's campaign (remember, this guy out attacked the CLINTON attack machine, the best and nastiest there ever was!) why Romney doesn't hit back with the Rev. Wright stuff. He married the Obama's, baptized their kids...a lifelong friend. The guy is utterly despicable, and a HUGE liability.

fansince'76
10-03-2012, 09:56 AM
The mainstream press is so in the tank for this guy it's sickening! Even before seeing the video they all circle the wagons to protect their hero.

:cheer2: WOOOHOOO! GO OBAMA GO! :cheer2: *slurps Kool-Aid*

suitanim
10-03-2012, 10:17 AM
:cheer2: WOOOHOOO! GO OBAMA GO! :cheer2: *slurps Kool-Aid*

In all fairness, EVERYONE, whether they drink the Hopey Koolaid, or are hopelessly dreaming of some magical third party fairy to come in and save the day should be interested to see how the 85% pop media that loves Barry Soetoro would actually react should he lose.

Rachel Maddow will jump off a bridge, and no great loss that. Perhaps some of these kooky moonbats will finally come though on their promise to leave the Country. Regardless, it will be priceless, PRICELESS to watch these people fall all over each other with the "sky is falling" doom and gloom that would inevitably follow...

fansince'76
10-03-2012, 11:40 AM
In all fairness, EVERYONE, whether they drink the Hopey Koolaid, or are hopelessly dreaming of some magical third party fairy to come in and save the day should be interested to see how the 85% pop media that loves Barry Soetoro would actually react should he lose.

Rachel Maddow will jump off a bridge, and no great loss that. Perhaps some of these kooky moonbats will finally come though on their promise to leave the Country. Regardless, it will be priceless, PRICELESS to watch these people fall all over each other with the "sky is falling" doom and gloom that would inevitably follow...

Prediction: The hue and cry of the day in that case will be "AmeriKKKa is RACIST!"

That's if he loses, which I don't think is gonna happen, and this is actually one of the reasons why. Which is also one of the primary reasons he has gotten the kids glove treatment he has up to now. Every time someone dares to give this guy any criticism whatsoever, the race card gets played.

suitanim
10-03-2012, 11:52 AM
Prediction: The hue and cry of the day in that case will be "AmeriKKKa is RACIST!"

That's if he loses, which I don't think is gonna happen, and this is actually one of the reasons why. Which is also one of the primary reasons he has gotten the kids glove treatment he has up to now. Every time someone dares to give this guy any criticism whatsoever, the race card gets played.
Interestingly, George Will had a piece on that very subject today. He used the example of the Indians hiring Frank Robinson (the first black MLB manager). On THIS DATE in 1974, the Indians made that historic hiring...and three years later, they fired him. THAT, claims Will, was the real example of colorblind equality. If we are truly headed for a post-race America, we can't hold onto a failed President simply because he's black.

To quote Will:
Managers get fired all the time. The fact that the Indians felt free to fire Robinson — who went on to have a distinguished career managing four other teams — showed that another racial barrier had fallen: Henceforth, African Americans, too, could enjoy the God-given right to be scapegoats for impatient team owners or incompetent team executives.


Perhaps a pleasant paradox defines this political season: That Obama is African American may be important, but in a way quite unlike that darkly suggested by, for example, MSNBC’s excitable boys and girls who, with their (at most) one-track minds and exquisitely sensitive olfactory receptors, sniff racism in any criticism of their pin-up. Instead, the nation, which is generally reluctant to declare a president a failure — thereby admitting that it made a mistake in choosing him — seems especially reluctant to give up on the first African American president. If so, the 2012 election speaks well of the nation’s heart, if not its head.

suitanim
10-03-2012, 12:18 PM
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/229484_431682646888454_1628722926_n.jpg

Doc_Holiday
10-04-2012, 10:56 PM
This was covered in the press, all networks, in 2007 and 2008; after all, the putz ran for president. Even "Mr. Bowtie" Tucker Carlson admitted to covering the story when it happened.

Let's stick to the recent b.s. as we have much more evidence the guy's a dink.

zulater
10-05-2012, 06:11 AM
This was covered in the press, all networks, in 2007 and 2008; after all, the putz ran for president. Even "Mr. Bowtie" Tucker Carlson admitted to covering the story when it happened.

Let's stick to the recent b.s. as we have much more evidence the guy's a dink.

No that's not true. The event was sanitized by the press, it was never reported in it's entirety, nor was the video available before.

zulater
10-05-2012, 06:20 AM
As “The Five” co-host Eric Bolling first observed, then-Sen. Barack Obama voted against a provision that would have waived Stafford Act obligations for victims of Hurricane Katrina just 10 days before he delivered the 2007 speech. Then, in the fiery speech, the president sharply criticized the federal government for supposedly refusing to waive Stafford Act requirements for the predominately black communities affected by the hurricane.

According to Levin, author of “Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America,” the “devious” media chose to ignore Obama’s hypocrisy and instead opted to shoot the messengers.

“This is as devious as it gets,” Levin said. “It doesn’t get any worse than this. And the media are attacking The Daily Caller, the Drudge Report, Sean Hannity for the video. You even have an idiot like Howard Kurtz — I thought Howard Kurtz had died or something, I’m certainly not wishing it on him or anybody else, but I just haven’t seen or heard from the guy. What’s he at, the Daily Beast or something like that? I don’t know. The Huffington Post? Or maybe retired or is in the witness protection program? Or left the country? But there he is.”

“And what’s he saying?” Levin said. “’This is a real loser. This video didn’t tell us anything.’ This video tells us everything. And those of us that already know it, it underscores it and puts 10 exclamation points behind it. He votes against the very law he uses to prove in his view, I guess to a group of ministers, that our government and the Bush administration in particular is racist in the way that [it] provides support for communities in trouble.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/04/mark-levin-emphasizes-importance-of-2007-obama-video-rips-howard-kurtz/#ixzz28Q0V451x

stillers4me
10-05-2012, 05:52 PM
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/548860_437402586296434_2107252195_n.jpg